Cargando…
Survival outcomes of perineural spread in head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
AIM: To present an institution's experience and survival outcomes for patients with head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (HNcSCC) and perineural spread (PNS). METHOD: Retrospective study of patients with HNcSCC and PNS treated between January 2010 and August 2020 from the Sydney Head...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35866314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.17908 |
Sumario: | AIM: To present an institution's experience and survival outcomes for patients with head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (HNcSCC) and perineural spread (PNS). METHOD: Retrospective study of patients with HNcSCC and PNS treated between January 2010 and August 2020 from the Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute database, Sydney, Australia; a high‐volume, tertiary, academic head and neck centre. Patient demographics, primary site, involved cranial nerves, treatment modality, loco‐regional failure and survival data were obtained. RESULTS: Forty‐five patients were identified, of which 32 patients were male (71%). Mean age at diagnosis was 68.7 years (range 43–90). Median follow‐up was 16.1 months (range 1–107). The trigeminal nerve was most frequently involved (n = 30, 66.6%) followed by facial nerve (n = 13, 28.9%). Most patients underwent surgery followed by radiotherapy (n = 33, 73%) and eight received definitive radiotherapy. The median overall survival (OS) was 4.5 years (95% CI 3.71–5.38), median disease‐specific survival 5.1 years (95% CI 4.21–5.97) and median disease‐free survival (DFS) was 1.7 years (95% CI 1.11–2.22). The estimated 5‐year OS and DFS were 45% and 25%, respectively. Patients treated with surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy with a clear proximal nerve margin had favourable DFS (P = 0.035) and trended towards better OS (P = 0.134) compared with patients with an involved nerve margin. Patients treated surgically with involved proximal nerve margins had similar outcomes compared with patients with treated definitive radiotherapy (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.29–2.22, P = 0.664). CONCLUSION: The likelihood of achieving a clear proximal nerve margin should be a strong consideration in the selection of appropriate patients for primary surgery |
---|