Cargando…

We live in a virtual world: Training the trainee using an integrated visual reality simulator curriculum

BACKGROUND: Gynaecology trainees struggle to obtain adequate procedural experience. Training programs integrating virtual reality simulators (VRS) have been suggested as a solution. AIMS: The study aimed to assess if a VRS training program (LapSim(®), Surgical Sciences, Göteborg, 2017) improved live...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mooney, Samantha S., Hiscock, Richard J., Hicks, Lauren, Narula, Shagun, Maher, Peter J., Readman, Emma, Pendlebury, Adam, Ellett, Lenore
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35394065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13521
_version_ 1784803872453165056
author Mooney, Samantha S.
Hiscock, Richard J.
Hicks, Lauren
Narula, Shagun
Maher, Peter J.
Readman, Emma
Pendlebury, Adam
Ellett, Lenore
author_facet Mooney, Samantha S.
Hiscock, Richard J.
Hicks, Lauren
Narula, Shagun
Maher, Peter J.
Readman, Emma
Pendlebury, Adam
Ellett, Lenore
author_sort Mooney, Samantha S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gynaecology trainees struggle to obtain adequate procedural experience. Training programs integrating virtual reality simulators (VRS) have been suggested as a solution. AIMS: The study aimed to assess if a VRS training program (LapSim(®), Surgical Sciences, Göteborg, 2017) improved live operating performance at six months for novice and experienced trainees. Additional outcomes included the association between LapSim(®) logged time and live operating performance at six months, LapSim(®) scores and live operating performance at zero and sixmonths and the difference in benefit for novice and experienced gynaecology trainees. METHODS: A prospective intervention study was conducted. Novice and experienced trainees were enrolled, and comparisons made at zero‐ and six‐month time points. The intervention groups were provided with a laparoscopic gynaecology curriculum incorporating VRS. Controls underwent routine training only. Assessment of live operating performance was conducted after six months training. RESULTS: Thirty‐five trainees participated, and 25 had access to the VRS curriculum (17 novice and eight experienced trainees). Access to the VRS curriculum and time spent training on the LapSim(®) made no difference to live operating ability for either intervention group (P > 0.05). The median (interquartile range) hours of VRS usage were 7.9 (4.5–10.8) and 6.0 (4.0–6.8) for novice and experienced trainees respectively. The intervention group provided positive feedback on the utility of VRS in their laparoscopic skill development. CONCLUSION: Optimal utilisation of VRS in Australian training paradigms remains incompletely understood. Further research is required to establish the most effective integration of VRS into training models to ensure uptake and transferability to the operating theatre.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9541199
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95411992022-10-14 We live in a virtual world: Training the trainee using an integrated visual reality simulator curriculum Mooney, Samantha S. Hiscock, Richard J. Hicks, Lauren Narula, Shagun Maher, Peter J. Readman, Emma Pendlebury, Adam Ellett, Lenore Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Gynaecology trainees struggle to obtain adequate procedural experience. Training programs integrating virtual reality simulators (VRS) have been suggested as a solution. AIMS: The study aimed to assess if a VRS training program (LapSim(®), Surgical Sciences, Göteborg, 2017) improved live operating performance at six months for novice and experienced trainees. Additional outcomes included the association between LapSim(®) logged time and live operating performance at six months, LapSim(®) scores and live operating performance at zero and sixmonths and the difference in benefit for novice and experienced gynaecology trainees. METHODS: A prospective intervention study was conducted. Novice and experienced trainees were enrolled, and comparisons made at zero‐ and six‐month time points. The intervention groups were provided with a laparoscopic gynaecology curriculum incorporating VRS. Controls underwent routine training only. Assessment of live operating performance was conducted after six months training. RESULTS: Thirty‐five trainees participated, and 25 had access to the VRS curriculum (17 novice and eight experienced trainees). Access to the VRS curriculum and time spent training on the LapSim(®) made no difference to live operating ability for either intervention group (P > 0.05). The median (interquartile range) hours of VRS usage were 7.9 (4.5–10.8) and 6.0 (4.0–6.8) for novice and experienced trainees respectively. The intervention group provided positive feedback on the utility of VRS in their laparoscopic skill development. CONCLUSION: Optimal utilisation of VRS in Australian training paradigms remains incompletely understood. Further research is required to establish the most effective integration of VRS into training models to ensure uptake and transferability to the operating theatre. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-08 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9541199/ /pubmed/35394065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13521 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Mooney, Samantha S.
Hiscock, Richard J.
Hicks, Lauren
Narula, Shagun
Maher, Peter J.
Readman, Emma
Pendlebury, Adam
Ellett, Lenore
We live in a virtual world: Training the trainee using an integrated visual reality simulator curriculum
title We live in a virtual world: Training the trainee using an integrated visual reality simulator curriculum
title_full We live in a virtual world: Training the trainee using an integrated visual reality simulator curriculum
title_fullStr We live in a virtual world: Training the trainee using an integrated visual reality simulator curriculum
title_full_unstemmed We live in a virtual world: Training the trainee using an integrated visual reality simulator curriculum
title_short We live in a virtual world: Training the trainee using an integrated visual reality simulator curriculum
title_sort we live in a virtual world: training the trainee using an integrated visual reality simulator curriculum
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35394065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13521
work_keys_str_mv AT mooneysamanthas weliveinavirtualworldtrainingthetraineeusinganintegratedvisualrealitysimulatorcurriculum
AT hiscockrichardj weliveinavirtualworldtrainingthetraineeusinganintegratedvisualrealitysimulatorcurriculum
AT hickslauren weliveinavirtualworldtrainingthetraineeusinganintegratedvisualrealitysimulatorcurriculum
AT narulashagun weliveinavirtualworldtrainingthetraineeusinganintegratedvisualrealitysimulatorcurriculum
AT maherpeterj weliveinavirtualworldtrainingthetraineeusinganintegratedvisualrealitysimulatorcurriculum
AT readmanemma weliveinavirtualworldtrainingthetraineeusinganintegratedvisualrealitysimulatorcurriculum
AT pendleburyadam weliveinavirtualworldtrainingthetraineeusinganintegratedvisualrealitysimulatorcurriculum
AT ellettlenore weliveinavirtualworldtrainingthetraineeusinganintegratedvisualrealitysimulatorcurriculum