Cargando…
We live in a virtual world: Training the trainee using an integrated visual reality simulator curriculum
BACKGROUND: Gynaecology trainees struggle to obtain adequate procedural experience. Training programs integrating virtual reality simulators (VRS) have been suggested as a solution. AIMS: The study aimed to assess if a VRS training program (LapSim(®), Surgical Sciences, Göteborg, 2017) improved live...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35394065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13521 |
_version_ | 1784803872453165056 |
---|---|
author | Mooney, Samantha S. Hiscock, Richard J. Hicks, Lauren Narula, Shagun Maher, Peter J. Readman, Emma Pendlebury, Adam Ellett, Lenore |
author_facet | Mooney, Samantha S. Hiscock, Richard J. Hicks, Lauren Narula, Shagun Maher, Peter J. Readman, Emma Pendlebury, Adam Ellett, Lenore |
author_sort | Mooney, Samantha S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gynaecology trainees struggle to obtain adequate procedural experience. Training programs integrating virtual reality simulators (VRS) have been suggested as a solution. AIMS: The study aimed to assess if a VRS training program (LapSim(®), Surgical Sciences, Göteborg, 2017) improved live operating performance at six months for novice and experienced trainees. Additional outcomes included the association between LapSim(®) logged time and live operating performance at six months, LapSim(®) scores and live operating performance at zero and sixmonths and the difference in benefit for novice and experienced gynaecology trainees. METHODS: A prospective intervention study was conducted. Novice and experienced trainees were enrolled, and comparisons made at zero‐ and six‐month time points. The intervention groups were provided with a laparoscopic gynaecology curriculum incorporating VRS. Controls underwent routine training only. Assessment of live operating performance was conducted after six months training. RESULTS: Thirty‐five trainees participated, and 25 had access to the VRS curriculum (17 novice and eight experienced trainees). Access to the VRS curriculum and time spent training on the LapSim(®) made no difference to live operating ability for either intervention group (P > 0.05). The median (interquartile range) hours of VRS usage were 7.9 (4.5–10.8) and 6.0 (4.0–6.8) for novice and experienced trainees respectively. The intervention group provided positive feedback on the utility of VRS in their laparoscopic skill development. CONCLUSION: Optimal utilisation of VRS in Australian training paradigms remains incompletely understood. Further research is required to establish the most effective integration of VRS into training models to ensure uptake and transferability to the operating theatre. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9541199 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95411992022-10-14 We live in a virtual world: Training the trainee using an integrated visual reality simulator curriculum Mooney, Samantha S. Hiscock, Richard J. Hicks, Lauren Narula, Shagun Maher, Peter J. Readman, Emma Pendlebury, Adam Ellett, Lenore Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Gynaecology trainees struggle to obtain adequate procedural experience. Training programs integrating virtual reality simulators (VRS) have been suggested as a solution. AIMS: The study aimed to assess if a VRS training program (LapSim(®), Surgical Sciences, Göteborg, 2017) improved live operating performance at six months for novice and experienced trainees. Additional outcomes included the association between LapSim(®) logged time and live operating performance at six months, LapSim(®) scores and live operating performance at zero and sixmonths and the difference in benefit for novice and experienced gynaecology trainees. METHODS: A prospective intervention study was conducted. Novice and experienced trainees were enrolled, and comparisons made at zero‐ and six‐month time points. The intervention groups were provided with a laparoscopic gynaecology curriculum incorporating VRS. Controls underwent routine training only. Assessment of live operating performance was conducted after six months training. RESULTS: Thirty‐five trainees participated, and 25 had access to the VRS curriculum (17 novice and eight experienced trainees). Access to the VRS curriculum and time spent training on the LapSim(®) made no difference to live operating ability for either intervention group (P > 0.05). The median (interquartile range) hours of VRS usage were 7.9 (4.5–10.8) and 6.0 (4.0–6.8) for novice and experienced trainees respectively. The intervention group provided positive feedback on the utility of VRS in their laparoscopic skill development. CONCLUSION: Optimal utilisation of VRS in Australian training paradigms remains incompletely understood. Further research is required to establish the most effective integration of VRS into training models to ensure uptake and transferability to the operating theatre. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-08 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9541199/ /pubmed/35394065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13521 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Mooney, Samantha S. Hiscock, Richard J. Hicks, Lauren Narula, Shagun Maher, Peter J. Readman, Emma Pendlebury, Adam Ellett, Lenore We live in a virtual world: Training the trainee using an integrated visual reality simulator curriculum |
title | We live in a virtual world: Training the trainee using an integrated visual reality simulator curriculum |
title_full | We live in a virtual world: Training the trainee using an integrated visual reality simulator curriculum |
title_fullStr | We live in a virtual world: Training the trainee using an integrated visual reality simulator curriculum |
title_full_unstemmed | We live in a virtual world: Training the trainee using an integrated visual reality simulator curriculum |
title_short | We live in a virtual world: Training the trainee using an integrated visual reality simulator curriculum |
title_sort | we live in a virtual world: training the trainee using an integrated visual reality simulator curriculum |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35394065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13521 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mooneysamanthas weliveinavirtualworldtrainingthetraineeusinganintegratedvisualrealitysimulatorcurriculum AT hiscockrichardj weliveinavirtualworldtrainingthetraineeusinganintegratedvisualrealitysimulatorcurriculum AT hickslauren weliveinavirtualworldtrainingthetraineeusinganintegratedvisualrealitysimulatorcurriculum AT narulashagun weliveinavirtualworldtrainingthetraineeusinganintegratedvisualrealitysimulatorcurriculum AT maherpeterj weliveinavirtualworldtrainingthetraineeusinganintegratedvisualrealitysimulatorcurriculum AT readmanemma weliveinavirtualworldtrainingthetraineeusinganintegratedvisualrealitysimulatorcurriculum AT pendleburyadam weliveinavirtualworldtrainingthetraineeusinganintegratedvisualrealitysimulatorcurriculum AT ellettlenore weliveinavirtualworldtrainingthetraineeusinganintegratedvisualrealitysimulatorcurriculum |