Cargando…

Sampling the skin surface chemistry for diagnosis and prognosis

Skin and wound blotting are non‐invasive techniques used to sample the skin and wound surface chemistry, whereby a nitrocellulose membrane is applied to an intact or broken cutaneous surface to detect biomarkers. However, there has been no comprehensive review of the evidence for the techniques used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stanley, Guy H. M., Wang, Katie, Daly, Patrick, Lau, Christopher, O'Brien, Aoife M., Hamill, Cheryl, Fear, Mark, Wood, Fiona M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35638724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/wrr.13030
_version_ 1784803883865866240
author Stanley, Guy H. M.
Wang, Katie
Daly, Patrick
Lau, Christopher
O'Brien, Aoife M.
Hamill, Cheryl
Fear, Mark
Wood, Fiona M.
author_facet Stanley, Guy H. M.
Wang, Katie
Daly, Patrick
Lau, Christopher
O'Brien, Aoife M.
Hamill, Cheryl
Fear, Mark
Wood, Fiona M.
author_sort Stanley, Guy H. M.
collection PubMed
description Skin and wound blotting are non‐invasive techniques used to sample the skin and wound surface chemistry, whereby a nitrocellulose membrane is applied to an intact or broken cutaneous surface to detect biomarkers. However, there has been no comprehensive review of the evidence for the techniques used and data obtained to date. The primary aim of this study was to review the utilities of surface blotting for the diagnosis and prognosis of physiological, pre‐disease, and pathological states. The secondary aim was to summarise the procedural steps. A systematic literature search was conducted on 9 July 2021 using Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar databases. Investigators used McMaster's Critical Review Form for Quantitative Studies to assess quality, then performed a narrative synthesis reporting according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Twenty‐five studies were reviewed. Eighteen studies were of good quality, and seven were of moderate quality. These studies conducted skin and wound blotting on 176 animals and 1546 humans. Studies reported physiological and pathological states for diagnosis and prediction of conditions, including skin tears, wound healing, biofilm detection, and skin barrier function. The four steps for blotting are surface preparation, blot preparation, application and removal of blot, and analysis. This review demonstrates that blotting can determine the skin and wound surface chemistry using a versatile and reproducible technique. However, future research is needed to validate the technique and skin biomarkers identified.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9541252
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95412522022-10-14 Sampling the skin surface chemistry for diagnosis and prognosis Stanley, Guy H. M. Wang, Katie Daly, Patrick Lau, Christopher O'Brien, Aoife M. Hamill, Cheryl Fear, Mark Wood, Fiona M. Wound Repair Regen Systematic Reviews Skin and wound blotting are non‐invasive techniques used to sample the skin and wound surface chemistry, whereby a nitrocellulose membrane is applied to an intact or broken cutaneous surface to detect biomarkers. However, there has been no comprehensive review of the evidence for the techniques used and data obtained to date. The primary aim of this study was to review the utilities of surface blotting for the diagnosis and prognosis of physiological, pre‐disease, and pathological states. The secondary aim was to summarise the procedural steps. A systematic literature search was conducted on 9 July 2021 using Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar databases. Investigators used McMaster's Critical Review Form for Quantitative Studies to assess quality, then performed a narrative synthesis reporting according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Twenty‐five studies were reviewed. Eighteen studies were of good quality, and seven were of moderate quality. These studies conducted skin and wound blotting on 176 animals and 1546 humans. Studies reported physiological and pathological states for diagnosis and prediction of conditions, including skin tears, wound healing, biofilm detection, and skin barrier function. The four steps for blotting are surface preparation, blot preparation, application and removal of blot, and analysis. This review demonstrates that blotting can determine the skin and wound surface chemistry using a versatile and reproducible technique. However, future research is needed to validate the technique and skin biomarkers identified. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-06-17 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9541252/ /pubmed/35638724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/wrr.13030 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Wound Repair and Regeneration published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Wound Healing Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
Stanley, Guy H. M.
Wang, Katie
Daly, Patrick
Lau, Christopher
O'Brien, Aoife M.
Hamill, Cheryl
Fear, Mark
Wood, Fiona M.
Sampling the skin surface chemistry for diagnosis and prognosis
title Sampling the skin surface chemistry for diagnosis and prognosis
title_full Sampling the skin surface chemistry for diagnosis and prognosis
title_fullStr Sampling the skin surface chemistry for diagnosis and prognosis
title_full_unstemmed Sampling the skin surface chemistry for diagnosis and prognosis
title_short Sampling the skin surface chemistry for diagnosis and prognosis
title_sort sampling the skin surface chemistry for diagnosis and prognosis
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35638724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/wrr.13030
work_keys_str_mv AT stanleyguyhm samplingtheskinsurfacechemistryfordiagnosisandprognosis
AT wangkatie samplingtheskinsurfacechemistryfordiagnosisandprognosis
AT dalypatrick samplingtheskinsurfacechemistryfordiagnosisandprognosis
AT lauchristopher samplingtheskinsurfacechemistryfordiagnosisandprognosis
AT obrienaoifem samplingtheskinsurfacechemistryfordiagnosisandprognosis
AT hamillcheryl samplingtheskinsurfacechemistryfordiagnosisandprognosis
AT fearmark samplingtheskinsurfacechemistryfordiagnosisandprognosis
AT woodfionam samplingtheskinsurfacechemistryfordiagnosisandprognosis