Cargando…

Thirty years of Thiel embalming—A systematic review on its utility in medical research

In 1992, Walter Thiel described and embalming method that rendered “lifelike” tissues. Over the last 30 years, the Thiel method has been introduced worldwide for medical training and scientific purposes. This review examines research which can be linked to the use of Thiel embalming. A systematic re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Niels, Hammer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35879645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ca.23936
_version_ 1784803905132036096
author Niels, Hammer
author_facet Niels, Hammer
author_sort Niels, Hammer
collection PubMed
description In 1992, Walter Thiel described and embalming method that rendered “lifelike” tissues. Over the last 30 years, the Thiel method has been introduced worldwide for medical training and scientific purposes. This review examines research which can be linked to the use of Thiel embalming. A systematic review was performed to identify articles published in the following categories: research content, disciplines involved, sources and quantities of tissues deployed, and changes in research scope related to changes in the chemical composition of Thiel embalming. Four‐hundred twenty‐four publications were included. A number of adaptations to the original Thiel protocol were found, aiming to provide suitable tissue‐substitutes in the development of emerging medical technologies or procedures. Musculoskeletal surgery, anesthesia and intensive care were the most common disciplines that used Thiel embalmed tissues for research. Anatomy and biomechanics played a lesser role. An increase over time was observed in research outputs related to the Thiel method, while the number of specimens used per study decreased. The main centers using Thiel embalming were in Graz, Dundee, Sapporo, Bern, Zurich and Ghent, which jointly accounted for more than 54% of all research conducted using this method. Following three decades of use, the Thiel method has evolved into being a well‐established embalming technique for research purposes. Its future is challenged by the demanding requirements on both technical facilities and personnel, limitations of certain chemicals for use as fixatives, costs, and questions as to how “lifelike” the embalmed‐tissues are from an objective standpoint, all of which warrants future investigations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9541350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95413502022-10-14 Thirty years of Thiel embalming—A systematic review on its utility in medical research Niels, Hammer Clin Anat Review In 1992, Walter Thiel described and embalming method that rendered “lifelike” tissues. Over the last 30 years, the Thiel method has been introduced worldwide for medical training and scientific purposes. This review examines research which can be linked to the use of Thiel embalming. A systematic review was performed to identify articles published in the following categories: research content, disciplines involved, sources and quantities of tissues deployed, and changes in research scope related to changes in the chemical composition of Thiel embalming. Four‐hundred twenty‐four publications were included. A number of adaptations to the original Thiel protocol were found, aiming to provide suitable tissue‐substitutes in the development of emerging medical technologies or procedures. Musculoskeletal surgery, anesthesia and intensive care were the most common disciplines that used Thiel embalmed tissues for research. Anatomy and biomechanics played a lesser role. An increase over time was observed in research outputs related to the Thiel method, while the number of specimens used per study decreased. The main centers using Thiel embalming were in Graz, Dundee, Sapporo, Bern, Zurich and Ghent, which jointly accounted for more than 54% of all research conducted using this method. Following three decades of use, the Thiel method has evolved into being a well‐established embalming technique for research purposes. Its future is challenged by the demanding requirements on both technical facilities and personnel, limitations of certain chemicals for use as fixatives, costs, and questions as to how “lifelike” the embalmed‐tissues are from an objective standpoint, all of which warrants future investigations. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-08-18 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9541350/ /pubmed/35879645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ca.23936 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical Anatomy published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Clinical Anatomists and British Association of Clinical Anatomists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Review
Niels, Hammer
Thirty years of Thiel embalming—A systematic review on its utility in medical research
title Thirty years of Thiel embalming—A systematic review on its utility in medical research
title_full Thirty years of Thiel embalming—A systematic review on its utility in medical research
title_fullStr Thirty years of Thiel embalming—A systematic review on its utility in medical research
title_full_unstemmed Thirty years of Thiel embalming—A systematic review on its utility in medical research
title_short Thirty years of Thiel embalming—A systematic review on its utility in medical research
title_sort thirty years of thiel embalming—a systematic review on its utility in medical research
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35879645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ca.23936
work_keys_str_mv AT nielshammer thirtyyearsofthielembalmingasystematicreviewonitsutilityinmedicalresearch