Cargando…

Impact of analgesic techniques on early quality of recovery after prostatectomy: A 3‐arm, randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Prostatectomy is associated with relevant acute postoperative pain. Optimal analgesic techniques to minimize pain and enhance recovery are still under investigation. We aimed to compare the effect of three different analgesic techniques on quality of recovery. METHODS: This investigator‐...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beilstein, Christian M., Huber, Markus, Furrer, Marc A., Löffel, Lukas M., Wuethrich, Patrick Y., Engel, Dominique
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35960649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.2020
_version_ 1784803905869185024
author Beilstein, Christian M.
Huber, Markus
Furrer, Marc A.
Löffel, Lukas M.
Wuethrich, Patrick Y.
Engel, Dominique
author_facet Beilstein, Christian M.
Huber, Markus
Furrer, Marc A.
Löffel, Lukas M.
Wuethrich, Patrick Y.
Engel, Dominique
author_sort Beilstein, Christian M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prostatectomy is associated with relevant acute postoperative pain. Optimal analgesic techniques to minimize pain and enhance recovery are still under investigation. We aimed to compare the effect of three different analgesic techniques on quality of recovery. METHODS: This investigator‐initiated, prospective, randomized, three‐arm, parallel‐group, active‐controlled, interventional superiority trial was performed in a Swiss teaching hospital from 2018 to 2021. Consecutive patients undergoing open or robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy were randomized to spinal anaesthesia (SSS, bupivacaine 0.5% + fentanyl), bilateral transversus abdominis plane block (TAP, ropivacaine 0.375% + clonidine) or systemic administration of lidocaine (SA, lidocaine 1%) in addition to general anaesthesia. Primary outcome was quality of recovery 15 (QoR‐15) score on postoperative day one compared to baseline. Secondary outcomes were QoR‐15 at discharge, postoperative nausea and vomiting, pain scores, return of gastrointestinal function and use of rescue analgesia. RESULTS: From 133 patients, 40 received spinal anaesthesia, 45 TAP block and 48 systemic analgesia. QoR‐15 scores did not differ on day 1 (p = 0.301) or at discharge (p = 0.309) when compared to baseline. QoR‐15 changes were similar in all groups. At discharge, median QoR‐15 scores were considered as good (>122) in all groups: SSS 134 [IQR 128–138]; TAP 129 [IQR 122–136] and SA 128 [IQR 123–136]. There were no significant differences in the other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of recovery on postoperative day one compared to baseline did not differ if spinal anaesthesia, TAP block or systemic administration of lidocaine was added to general anaesthesia. SIGNIFICANCE: Optimal analgesic techniques to enhance recovery after prostatectomy are still under investigation. In this 3‐arm randomized controlled trial, addition of spinal anaesthesia or transversus abdominis plane block to general anaesthesia did not improve quality of recovery after radical prostatectomy compared to less invasive intravenous lidocaine infusion (standard of care/control group). Quality of recovery at the time of discharge was considered as good in all three groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9541353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95413532022-10-14 Impact of analgesic techniques on early quality of recovery after prostatectomy: A 3‐arm, randomized trial Beilstein, Christian M. Huber, Markus Furrer, Marc A. Löffel, Lukas M. Wuethrich, Patrick Y. Engel, Dominique Eur J Pain Original Articles BACKGROUND: Prostatectomy is associated with relevant acute postoperative pain. Optimal analgesic techniques to minimize pain and enhance recovery are still under investigation. We aimed to compare the effect of three different analgesic techniques on quality of recovery. METHODS: This investigator‐initiated, prospective, randomized, three‐arm, parallel‐group, active‐controlled, interventional superiority trial was performed in a Swiss teaching hospital from 2018 to 2021. Consecutive patients undergoing open or robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy were randomized to spinal anaesthesia (SSS, bupivacaine 0.5% + fentanyl), bilateral transversus abdominis plane block (TAP, ropivacaine 0.375% + clonidine) or systemic administration of lidocaine (SA, lidocaine 1%) in addition to general anaesthesia. Primary outcome was quality of recovery 15 (QoR‐15) score on postoperative day one compared to baseline. Secondary outcomes were QoR‐15 at discharge, postoperative nausea and vomiting, pain scores, return of gastrointestinal function and use of rescue analgesia. RESULTS: From 133 patients, 40 received spinal anaesthesia, 45 TAP block and 48 systemic analgesia. QoR‐15 scores did not differ on day 1 (p = 0.301) or at discharge (p = 0.309) when compared to baseline. QoR‐15 changes were similar in all groups. At discharge, median QoR‐15 scores were considered as good (>122) in all groups: SSS 134 [IQR 128–138]; TAP 129 [IQR 122–136] and SA 128 [IQR 123–136]. There were no significant differences in the other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of recovery on postoperative day one compared to baseline did not differ if spinal anaesthesia, TAP block or systemic administration of lidocaine was added to general anaesthesia. SIGNIFICANCE: Optimal analgesic techniques to enhance recovery after prostatectomy are still under investigation. In this 3‐arm randomized controlled trial, addition of spinal anaesthesia or transversus abdominis plane block to general anaesthesia did not improve quality of recovery after radical prostatectomy compared to less invasive intravenous lidocaine infusion (standard of care/control group). Quality of recovery at the time of discharge was considered as good in all three groups. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-21 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9541353/ /pubmed/35960649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.2020 Text en © 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation ‐ EFIC ®. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Beilstein, Christian M.
Huber, Markus
Furrer, Marc A.
Löffel, Lukas M.
Wuethrich, Patrick Y.
Engel, Dominique
Impact of analgesic techniques on early quality of recovery after prostatectomy: A 3‐arm, randomized trial
title Impact of analgesic techniques on early quality of recovery after prostatectomy: A 3‐arm, randomized trial
title_full Impact of analgesic techniques on early quality of recovery after prostatectomy: A 3‐arm, randomized trial
title_fullStr Impact of analgesic techniques on early quality of recovery after prostatectomy: A 3‐arm, randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Impact of analgesic techniques on early quality of recovery after prostatectomy: A 3‐arm, randomized trial
title_short Impact of analgesic techniques on early quality of recovery after prostatectomy: A 3‐arm, randomized trial
title_sort impact of analgesic techniques on early quality of recovery after prostatectomy: a 3‐arm, randomized trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35960649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.2020
work_keys_str_mv AT beilsteinchristianm impactofanalgesictechniquesonearlyqualityofrecoveryafterprostatectomya3armrandomizedtrial
AT hubermarkus impactofanalgesictechniquesonearlyqualityofrecoveryafterprostatectomya3armrandomizedtrial
AT furrermarca impactofanalgesictechniquesonearlyqualityofrecoveryafterprostatectomya3armrandomizedtrial
AT loffellukasm impactofanalgesictechniquesonearlyqualityofrecoveryafterprostatectomya3armrandomizedtrial
AT wuethrichpatricky impactofanalgesictechniquesonearlyqualityofrecoveryafterprostatectomya3armrandomizedtrial
AT engeldominique impactofanalgesictechniquesonearlyqualityofrecoveryafterprostatectomya3armrandomizedtrial