Cargando…

Regional variance in treatment and outcomes of locally invasive (T4) rectal cancer in Australia and New Zealand: analysis of the Bi‐National Colorectal Cancer Audit

BACKGROUNDS: Locally invasive T4 rectal cancer often requires neoadjuvant treatment followed by multi‐visceral surgery to achieve a radical resection (R0), and referral to a specialized exenteration quaternary centre is typically recommended. The aim of this study was to explore regional variance in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dinger, Tessa L., Kroon, Hidde M., Traeger, Luke, Bedrikovetski, Sergei, Hunter, Andrew, Sammour, Tarik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35502647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.17699
_version_ 1784803908869160960
author Dinger, Tessa L.
Kroon, Hidde M.
Traeger, Luke
Bedrikovetski, Sergei
Hunter, Andrew
Sammour, Tarik
author_facet Dinger, Tessa L.
Kroon, Hidde M.
Traeger, Luke
Bedrikovetski, Sergei
Hunter, Andrew
Sammour, Tarik
author_sort Dinger, Tessa L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUNDS: Locally invasive T4 rectal cancer often requires neoadjuvant treatment followed by multi‐visceral surgery to achieve a radical resection (R0), and referral to a specialized exenteration quaternary centre is typically recommended. The aim of this study was to explore regional variance in treatment and outcomes of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ). METHODS: Data were collected from the Bi‐National Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA) database. Rectal cancer patients treated between 2007 and 2019 were divided into six groups based on region (state/country) using patient postcode. A subset analysis of patients with T4 cancer was performed. Primary outcomes were positive circumferential resection margin (CRM+), and positive circumferential and/or distal resection margin (CRM/DRM+). RESULTS: A total of 9385 patients with rectal cancer were identified, with an overall CRM+ rate of 6.4% and CRM/DRM+ rate of 8.6%. There were 1350 patients with T4 rectal cancer (14.4%). For these patients, CRM+ rate was 18.5%, and CRM/DRM+ rate was 24.1%. Significant regional variation in CRM+ (range 13.4–26.0%; p = 0.025) and CRM/DRM+ rates (range 16.1–29.3%; p = 0.005) was identified. In addition, regions with higher CRM+ and CRM/DRM+ rates reported lower rates of multi‐visceral resections: range 24.3–26.8%, versus 32.6–37.3% for regions with lower CRM+ and CRM/DRM+ rates (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Positive resection margins and rates of multi‐visceral resection vary between the different regions of ANZ. A small subset of patients with T4 rectal cancer are particularly at risk, further supporting the concept of referral to specialized exenteration centres for potentially curative multi‐visceral resection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9541368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95413682022-10-14 Regional variance in treatment and outcomes of locally invasive (T4) rectal cancer in Australia and New Zealand: analysis of the Bi‐National Colorectal Cancer Audit Dinger, Tessa L. Kroon, Hidde M. Traeger, Luke Bedrikovetski, Sergei Hunter, Andrew Sammour, Tarik ANZ J Surg Colorectal Surgery BACKGROUNDS: Locally invasive T4 rectal cancer often requires neoadjuvant treatment followed by multi‐visceral surgery to achieve a radical resection (R0), and referral to a specialized exenteration quaternary centre is typically recommended. The aim of this study was to explore regional variance in treatment and outcomes of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ). METHODS: Data were collected from the Bi‐National Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA) database. Rectal cancer patients treated between 2007 and 2019 were divided into six groups based on region (state/country) using patient postcode. A subset analysis of patients with T4 cancer was performed. Primary outcomes were positive circumferential resection margin (CRM+), and positive circumferential and/or distal resection margin (CRM/DRM+). RESULTS: A total of 9385 patients with rectal cancer were identified, with an overall CRM+ rate of 6.4% and CRM/DRM+ rate of 8.6%. There were 1350 patients with T4 rectal cancer (14.4%). For these patients, CRM+ rate was 18.5%, and CRM/DRM+ rate was 24.1%. Significant regional variation in CRM+ (range 13.4–26.0%; p = 0.025) and CRM/DRM+ rates (range 16.1–29.3%; p = 0.005) was identified. In addition, regions with higher CRM+ and CRM/DRM+ rates reported lower rates of multi‐visceral resections: range 24.3–26.8%, versus 32.6–37.3% for regions with lower CRM+ and CRM/DRM+ rates (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Positive resection margins and rates of multi‐visceral resection vary between the different regions of ANZ. A small subset of patients with T4 rectal cancer are particularly at risk, further supporting the concept of referral to specialized exenteration centres for potentially curative multi‐visceral resection. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-05-03 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9541368/ /pubmed/35502647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.17699 Text en © 2022 The Authors. ANZ Journal of Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Colorectal Surgery
Dinger, Tessa L.
Kroon, Hidde M.
Traeger, Luke
Bedrikovetski, Sergei
Hunter, Andrew
Sammour, Tarik
Regional variance in treatment and outcomes of locally invasive (T4) rectal cancer in Australia and New Zealand: analysis of the Bi‐National Colorectal Cancer Audit
title Regional variance in treatment and outcomes of locally invasive (T4) rectal cancer in Australia and New Zealand: analysis of the Bi‐National Colorectal Cancer Audit
title_full Regional variance in treatment and outcomes of locally invasive (T4) rectal cancer in Australia and New Zealand: analysis of the Bi‐National Colorectal Cancer Audit
title_fullStr Regional variance in treatment and outcomes of locally invasive (T4) rectal cancer in Australia and New Zealand: analysis of the Bi‐National Colorectal Cancer Audit
title_full_unstemmed Regional variance in treatment and outcomes of locally invasive (T4) rectal cancer in Australia and New Zealand: analysis of the Bi‐National Colorectal Cancer Audit
title_short Regional variance in treatment and outcomes of locally invasive (T4) rectal cancer in Australia and New Zealand: analysis of the Bi‐National Colorectal Cancer Audit
title_sort regional variance in treatment and outcomes of locally invasive (t4) rectal cancer in australia and new zealand: analysis of the bi‐national colorectal cancer audit
topic Colorectal Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35502647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.17699
work_keys_str_mv AT dingertessal regionalvarianceintreatmentandoutcomesoflocallyinvasivet4rectalcancerinaustraliaandnewzealandanalysisofthebinationalcolorectalcanceraudit
AT kroonhiddem regionalvarianceintreatmentandoutcomesoflocallyinvasivet4rectalcancerinaustraliaandnewzealandanalysisofthebinationalcolorectalcanceraudit
AT traegerluke regionalvarianceintreatmentandoutcomesoflocallyinvasivet4rectalcancerinaustraliaandnewzealandanalysisofthebinationalcolorectalcanceraudit
AT bedrikovetskisergei regionalvarianceintreatmentandoutcomesoflocallyinvasivet4rectalcancerinaustraliaandnewzealandanalysisofthebinationalcolorectalcanceraudit
AT hunterandrew regionalvarianceintreatmentandoutcomesoflocallyinvasivet4rectalcancerinaustraliaandnewzealandanalysisofthebinationalcolorectalcanceraudit
AT sammourtarik regionalvarianceintreatmentandoutcomesoflocallyinvasivet4rectalcancerinaustraliaandnewzealandanalysisofthebinationalcolorectalcanceraudit