Cargando…

Prophylactic Intrawound Vancomycin Powder in Minimally Invasive Spine Stabilization May Cause an Acute Inflammatory Response

Introduction Surgical site infections (SSIs) with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus are serious complications of spinal instrumentation surgery. Many spine surgeons are concerned that using prophylactic vancomycin powder will lead to certain risks: the development of multidrug-resistant pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hyodo, Yuki, Arizono, Takeshi, Inokuchi, Akihiko, Hamada, Takahiro, Imamura, Ryuta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36225472
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28881
_version_ 1784803911105773568
author Hyodo, Yuki
Arizono, Takeshi
Inokuchi, Akihiko
Hamada, Takahiro
Imamura, Ryuta
author_facet Hyodo, Yuki
Arizono, Takeshi
Inokuchi, Akihiko
Hamada, Takahiro
Imamura, Ryuta
author_sort Hyodo, Yuki
collection PubMed
description Introduction Surgical site infections (SSIs) with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus are serious complications of spinal instrumentation surgery. Many spine surgeons are concerned that using prophylactic vancomycin powder will lead to certain risks: the development of multidrug-resistant pathogens, anaphylactic reactions, and organ toxicity. Minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISt) is associated with shorter operation times and less blood loss and may therefore require the use of less vancomycin powder, which may reduce these risks. This retrospective comparative study of patients who underwent MISt at a single institution aimed to evaluate the complications (such as allergy, SSIs, and organ toxicity) and the local and serum levels associated with using prophylactic intrawound vancomycin powder compared with IV cefazolin alone. Methods Thirty-four patients received intrawound vancomycin powder (1 g) applied during wound closure in minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-PLIF). This group was compared with 133 control patients who did not receive vancomycin. White blood cell counts and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured for both groups on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 3, and 7 and were statistically analyzed. In the vancomycin group, serum vancomycin levels were measured on PODs 1, 3, 7, and 14; drain vancomycin levels and postoperative blood loss were determined on PODs 1 and 2. Results The CRP levels on PODs 1 and 3 were significantly higher in the vancomycin group than in the control group (P<0.001, P=0.024). In the vancomycin group, mean drain levels trended downward from 313 μg/mL (POD 1) to 155 μg/mL (POD 2). These levels correlated negatively with drain drainage volume on both days (POD 1: r=-0.48, P=0.015; POD 2: r=-0.47, P=0.019). Mean serum vancomycin levels also trended downward from 2.3 μg/mL (POD 1) to 1.7 μg/mL (POD 14). Conclusions Our results unexpectedly demonstrated that the local application of vancomycin powder causes an acute inflammatory response and the long-term detection of low serum vancomycin levels. Less than 1 g of intrawound vancomycin powder may be useful only at high risk of SSI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9541380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95413802022-10-11 Prophylactic Intrawound Vancomycin Powder in Minimally Invasive Spine Stabilization May Cause an Acute Inflammatory Response Hyodo, Yuki Arizono, Takeshi Inokuchi, Akihiko Hamada, Takahiro Imamura, Ryuta Cureus Orthopedics Introduction Surgical site infections (SSIs) with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus are serious complications of spinal instrumentation surgery. Many spine surgeons are concerned that using prophylactic vancomycin powder will lead to certain risks: the development of multidrug-resistant pathogens, anaphylactic reactions, and organ toxicity. Minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISt) is associated with shorter operation times and less blood loss and may therefore require the use of less vancomycin powder, which may reduce these risks. This retrospective comparative study of patients who underwent MISt at a single institution aimed to evaluate the complications (such as allergy, SSIs, and organ toxicity) and the local and serum levels associated with using prophylactic intrawound vancomycin powder compared with IV cefazolin alone. Methods Thirty-four patients received intrawound vancomycin powder (1 g) applied during wound closure in minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-PLIF). This group was compared with 133 control patients who did not receive vancomycin. White blood cell counts and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured for both groups on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 3, and 7 and were statistically analyzed. In the vancomycin group, serum vancomycin levels were measured on PODs 1, 3, 7, and 14; drain vancomycin levels and postoperative blood loss were determined on PODs 1 and 2. Results The CRP levels on PODs 1 and 3 were significantly higher in the vancomycin group than in the control group (P<0.001, P=0.024). In the vancomycin group, mean drain levels trended downward from 313 μg/mL (POD 1) to 155 μg/mL (POD 2). These levels correlated negatively with drain drainage volume on both days (POD 1: r=-0.48, P=0.015; POD 2: r=-0.47, P=0.019). Mean serum vancomycin levels also trended downward from 2.3 μg/mL (POD 1) to 1.7 μg/mL (POD 14). Conclusions Our results unexpectedly demonstrated that the local application of vancomycin powder causes an acute inflammatory response and the long-term detection of low serum vancomycin levels. Less than 1 g of intrawound vancomycin powder may be useful only at high risk of SSI. Cureus 2022-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9541380/ /pubmed/36225472 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28881 Text en Copyright © 2022, Hyodo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Orthopedics
Hyodo, Yuki
Arizono, Takeshi
Inokuchi, Akihiko
Hamada, Takahiro
Imamura, Ryuta
Prophylactic Intrawound Vancomycin Powder in Minimally Invasive Spine Stabilization May Cause an Acute Inflammatory Response
title Prophylactic Intrawound Vancomycin Powder in Minimally Invasive Spine Stabilization May Cause an Acute Inflammatory Response
title_full Prophylactic Intrawound Vancomycin Powder in Minimally Invasive Spine Stabilization May Cause an Acute Inflammatory Response
title_fullStr Prophylactic Intrawound Vancomycin Powder in Minimally Invasive Spine Stabilization May Cause an Acute Inflammatory Response
title_full_unstemmed Prophylactic Intrawound Vancomycin Powder in Minimally Invasive Spine Stabilization May Cause an Acute Inflammatory Response
title_short Prophylactic Intrawound Vancomycin Powder in Minimally Invasive Spine Stabilization May Cause an Acute Inflammatory Response
title_sort prophylactic intrawound vancomycin powder in minimally invasive spine stabilization may cause an acute inflammatory response
topic Orthopedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36225472
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28881
work_keys_str_mv AT hyodoyuki prophylacticintrawoundvancomycinpowderinminimallyinvasivespinestabilizationmaycauseanacuteinflammatoryresponse
AT arizonotakeshi prophylacticintrawoundvancomycinpowderinminimallyinvasivespinestabilizationmaycauseanacuteinflammatoryresponse
AT inokuchiakihiko prophylacticintrawoundvancomycinpowderinminimallyinvasivespinestabilizationmaycauseanacuteinflammatoryresponse
AT hamadatakahiro prophylacticintrawoundvancomycinpowderinminimallyinvasivespinestabilizationmaycauseanacuteinflammatoryresponse
AT imamuraryuta prophylacticintrawoundvancomycinpowderinminimallyinvasivespinestabilizationmaycauseanacuteinflammatoryresponse