Cargando…

Factors promoting breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screenings participation: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE: The present study aims at systematically reviewing research conducted on factors promoting breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screenings participation. METHODS: A literature search in MEDLINE/PubMed and PsycInfo from January 2017 to October 2021 was performed. Data extraction, researc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vallone, Federica, Lemmo, Daniela, Martino, Maria Luisa, Donizzetti, Anna Rosa, Freda, Maria Francesca, Palumbo, Francesco, Lorenzo, Elvira, D’Argenzio, Angelo, Caso, Daniela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35793430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.5997
_version_ 1784803928637964288
author Vallone, Federica
Lemmo, Daniela
Martino, Maria Luisa
Donizzetti, Anna Rosa
Freda, Maria Francesca
Palumbo, Francesco
Lorenzo, Elvira
D’Argenzio, Angelo
Caso, Daniela
author_facet Vallone, Federica
Lemmo, Daniela
Martino, Maria Luisa
Donizzetti, Anna Rosa
Freda, Maria Francesca
Palumbo, Francesco
Lorenzo, Elvira
D’Argenzio, Angelo
Caso, Daniela
author_sort Vallone, Federica
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The present study aims at systematically reviewing research conducted on factors promoting breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screenings participation. METHODS: A literature search in MEDLINE/PubMed and PsycInfo from January 2017 to October 2021 was performed. Data extraction, researchers' full agreement and the inclusion criteria produced 102 eligible studies. Data were narratively synthesized and critically interpreted. RESULTS: Multiple factors favoring or hindering breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screenings were identified and summarized as factors operating at the individual level (background information, individual characteristics, emotions related to screening procedure and to cancer, knowledge and awareness), at the relational level (relationships with healthcare staff, significant others, community members), and at the healthcare system level (systems barriers/policy, lack of staff). A critical appraisal of studies revealed a fragmentation in the literature, with a compartmentalization of studies by type of cancer screening, country and specific populations of destination. CONCLUSIONS: Overall findings indicated that greater integration of research results obtained independently for each cancer diagnosis and within the different countries/populations could foster a more comprehensive understanding of factors potentially enhancing the participation in breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screenings worldwide. This review, which is grounded in the current context of globalization and superdiversification in population, can help to enhance a better integration between research and practices, by supporting the development of more effective and inclusive evidence‐based interventions and health‐promotion campaigns worldwide. Research and practical implications are highlighted and discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9541457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95414572022-10-14 Factors promoting breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screenings participation: A systematic review Vallone, Federica Lemmo, Daniela Martino, Maria Luisa Donizzetti, Anna Rosa Freda, Maria Francesca Palumbo, Francesco Lorenzo, Elvira D’Argenzio, Angelo Caso, Daniela Psychooncology Reviews OBJECTIVE: The present study aims at systematically reviewing research conducted on factors promoting breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screenings participation. METHODS: A literature search in MEDLINE/PubMed and PsycInfo from January 2017 to October 2021 was performed. Data extraction, researchers' full agreement and the inclusion criteria produced 102 eligible studies. Data were narratively synthesized and critically interpreted. RESULTS: Multiple factors favoring or hindering breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screenings were identified and summarized as factors operating at the individual level (background information, individual characteristics, emotions related to screening procedure and to cancer, knowledge and awareness), at the relational level (relationships with healthcare staff, significant others, community members), and at the healthcare system level (systems barriers/policy, lack of staff). A critical appraisal of studies revealed a fragmentation in the literature, with a compartmentalization of studies by type of cancer screening, country and specific populations of destination. CONCLUSIONS: Overall findings indicated that greater integration of research results obtained independently for each cancer diagnosis and within the different countries/populations could foster a more comprehensive understanding of factors potentially enhancing the participation in breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screenings worldwide. This review, which is grounded in the current context of globalization and superdiversification in population, can help to enhance a better integration between research and practices, by supporting the development of more effective and inclusive evidence‐based interventions and health‐promotion campaigns worldwide. Research and practical implications are highlighted and discussed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-12 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9541457/ /pubmed/35793430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.5997 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Psycho-Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Reviews
Vallone, Federica
Lemmo, Daniela
Martino, Maria Luisa
Donizzetti, Anna Rosa
Freda, Maria Francesca
Palumbo, Francesco
Lorenzo, Elvira
D’Argenzio, Angelo
Caso, Daniela
Factors promoting breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screenings participation: A systematic review
title Factors promoting breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screenings participation: A systematic review
title_full Factors promoting breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screenings participation: A systematic review
title_fullStr Factors promoting breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screenings participation: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Factors promoting breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screenings participation: A systematic review
title_short Factors promoting breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screenings participation: A systematic review
title_sort factors promoting breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screenings participation: a systematic review
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35793430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.5997
work_keys_str_mv AT vallonefederica factorspromotingbreastcervicalandcolorectalcancerscreeningsparticipationasystematicreview
AT lemmodaniela factorspromotingbreastcervicalandcolorectalcancerscreeningsparticipationasystematicreview
AT martinomarialuisa factorspromotingbreastcervicalandcolorectalcancerscreeningsparticipationasystematicreview
AT donizzettiannarosa factorspromotingbreastcervicalandcolorectalcancerscreeningsparticipationasystematicreview
AT fredamariafrancesca factorspromotingbreastcervicalandcolorectalcancerscreeningsparticipationasystematicreview
AT palumbofrancesco factorspromotingbreastcervicalandcolorectalcancerscreeningsparticipationasystematicreview
AT lorenzoelvira factorspromotingbreastcervicalandcolorectalcancerscreeningsparticipationasystematicreview
AT dargenzioangelo factorspromotingbreastcervicalandcolorectalcancerscreeningsparticipationasystematicreview
AT casodaniela factorspromotingbreastcervicalandcolorectalcancerscreeningsparticipationasystematicreview