Cargando…

Evaluating Uncertainty and Modes of Variability for Antarctic Atmospheric Rivers

Antarctic atmospheric rivers (ARs) are driven by their synoptic environments and lead to profound and varying impacts along the coastlines and over the continent. The definition and detection of ARs over Antarctica accounts for large uncertainty in AR metrics, and consequently, impacts quantificatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shields, Christine A., Wille, Jonathan D., Marquardt Collow, Allison B., Maclennan, Michelle, Gorodetskaya, Irina V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36249465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099577
_version_ 1784803934109433856
author Shields, Christine A.
Wille, Jonathan D.
Marquardt Collow, Allison B.
Maclennan, Michelle
Gorodetskaya, Irina V.
author_facet Shields, Christine A.
Wille, Jonathan D.
Marquardt Collow, Allison B.
Maclennan, Michelle
Gorodetskaya, Irina V.
author_sort Shields, Christine A.
collection PubMed
description Antarctic atmospheric rivers (ARs) are driven by their synoptic environments and lead to profound and varying impacts along the coastlines and over the continent. The definition and detection of ARs over Antarctica accounts for large uncertainty in AR metrics, and consequently, impacts quantification. We find that Antarctic‐specific detection tools consistently capture the AR footprint inland over ice sheets, whereas most global detection tools do not. Large‐scale synoptic environments and associated ARs, however, are broadly consistent across detection tools. Using data from the Atmospheric River Tracking Method Intercomparison Project and global reanalyses, we quantify the uncertainty in Antarctic AR metrics and evaluate large‐scale environments in the context of decadal and interannual modes of variability. The Antarctic western hemisphere has stronger connections to both decadal and interannual modes of variability compared to East Antarctica, and the Indian Ocean Dipole’s influence on Antarctic ARs is stronger while in phase with El Nino Southern Oscillation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9541479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95414792022-10-14 Evaluating Uncertainty and Modes of Variability for Antarctic Atmospheric Rivers Shields, Christine A. Wille, Jonathan D. Marquardt Collow, Allison B. Maclennan, Michelle Gorodetskaya, Irina V. Geophys Res Lett Research Letter Antarctic atmospheric rivers (ARs) are driven by their synoptic environments and lead to profound and varying impacts along the coastlines and over the continent. The definition and detection of ARs over Antarctica accounts for large uncertainty in AR metrics, and consequently, impacts quantification. We find that Antarctic‐specific detection tools consistently capture the AR footprint inland over ice sheets, whereas most global detection tools do not. Large‐scale synoptic environments and associated ARs, however, are broadly consistent across detection tools. Using data from the Atmospheric River Tracking Method Intercomparison Project and global reanalyses, we quantify the uncertainty in Antarctic AR metrics and evaluate large‐scale environments in the context of decadal and interannual modes of variability. The Antarctic western hemisphere has stronger connections to both decadal and interannual modes of variability compared to East Antarctica, and the Indian Ocean Dipole’s influence on Antarctic ARs is stronger while in phase with El Nino Southern Oscillation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-26 2022-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9541479/ /pubmed/36249465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099577 Text en © 2022. The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Letter
Shields, Christine A.
Wille, Jonathan D.
Marquardt Collow, Allison B.
Maclennan, Michelle
Gorodetskaya, Irina V.
Evaluating Uncertainty and Modes of Variability for Antarctic Atmospheric Rivers
title Evaluating Uncertainty and Modes of Variability for Antarctic Atmospheric Rivers
title_full Evaluating Uncertainty and Modes of Variability for Antarctic Atmospheric Rivers
title_fullStr Evaluating Uncertainty and Modes of Variability for Antarctic Atmospheric Rivers
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Uncertainty and Modes of Variability for Antarctic Atmospheric Rivers
title_short Evaluating Uncertainty and Modes of Variability for Antarctic Atmospheric Rivers
title_sort evaluating uncertainty and modes of variability for antarctic atmospheric rivers
topic Research Letter
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36249465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099577
work_keys_str_mv AT shieldschristinea evaluatinguncertaintyandmodesofvariabilityforantarcticatmosphericrivers
AT willejonathand evaluatinguncertaintyandmodesofvariabilityforantarcticatmosphericrivers
AT marquardtcollowallisonb evaluatinguncertaintyandmodesofvariabilityforantarcticatmosphericrivers
AT maclennanmichelle evaluatinguncertaintyandmodesofvariabilityforantarcticatmosphericrivers
AT gorodetskayairinav evaluatinguncertaintyandmodesofvariabilityforantarcticatmosphericrivers