Cargando…
Angiogenic factors for planning fetal surveillance in fetal growth restriction and small‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses: A prospective observational study
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the added value of the soluble fms‐like tyrosine kinase‐1 (sFlt‐1) and placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio for adjusting the periodicity of ultrasound examinations in early‐onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) and small for gestational age (SGA). DESIG...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35303394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17151 |
_version_ | 1784803935798689792 |
---|---|
author | Bonacina, Erika Mendoza, Manel Farràs, Alba Garcia‐Manau, Pablo Serrano, Berta Hurtado, Ivan Ferrer‐Oliveras, Raquel Illan, Lidia Armengol‐Alsina, Mireia Carreras, Elena |
author_facet | Bonacina, Erika Mendoza, Manel Farràs, Alba Garcia‐Manau, Pablo Serrano, Berta Hurtado, Ivan Ferrer‐Oliveras, Raquel Illan, Lidia Armengol‐Alsina, Mireia Carreras, Elena |
author_sort | Bonacina, Erika |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the added value of the soluble fms‐like tyrosine kinase‐1 (sFlt‐1) and placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio for adjusting the periodicity of ultrasound examinations in early‐onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) and small for gestational age (SGA). DESIGN: A prospective, observational study. SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital. POPULATION: One hundred and thirty‐four single pregnancies with ultrasonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) below the 10th centile between 20(+0) and 31(+6) weeks of gestation with antegrade umbilical artery flow. METHODS: The time from Doppler and sFlt‐1/PlGF assessment to delivery was recorded and classified into four ranges: <1, <2, <3 and <4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of sFlt‐1/PlGF values to predict the time to delivery. RESULTS: In the SGA cohort, the NPV calculated for an sFlt‐1/PlGF cut‐off value of 38 was 100% for delivery before 3 weeks, and 98% for delivery before 4 weeks after diagnosis (95% CI 0.89–1.00). In the FGR cohort, the NPV calculated for an sFlt‐1/PlGF cut‐off value of 38 was 100% for delivery before 2 weeks after diagnosis (95% CI 0.92–1.00). By contrast, more than 50% of cases with an sFlt‐1/PlGF value of >85 required an elective delivery before 1 week. CONCLUSIONS: sFlt‐1/PlGF values in early‐onset SGA and FGR are predictive of the time to delivery and could be used for planning fetal surveillance, by reducing the frequency of ultrasound in cases with sFlt‐1/PlGF < 38 and by providing closer follow‐up in cases with sFlt‐1/PlGF >85. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: sFlt‐1/PlGF values in early‐onset SGA/FGR could be used in addition to Doppler for planning fetal surveillance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9541486 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95414862022-10-14 Angiogenic factors for planning fetal surveillance in fetal growth restriction and small‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses: A prospective observational study Bonacina, Erika Mendoza, Manel Farràs, Alba Garcia‐Manau, Pablo Serrano, Berta Hurtado, Ivan Ferrer‐Oliveras, Raquel Illan, Lidia Armengol‐Alsina, Mireia Carreras, Elena BJOG RESEARCH ARTICLES OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the added value of the soluble fms‐like tyrosine kinase‐1 (sFlt‐1) and placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio for adjusting the periodicity of ultrasound examinations in early‐onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) and small for gestational age (SGA). DESIGN: A prospective, observational study. SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital. POPULATION: One hundred and thirty‐four single pregnancies with ultrasonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) below the 10th centile between 20(+0) and 31(+6) weeks of gestation with antegrade umbilical artery flow. METHODS: The time from Doppler and sFlt‐1/PlGF assessment to delivery was recorded and classified into four ranges: <1, <2, <3 and <4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of sFlt‐1/PlGF values to predict the time to delivery. RESULTS: In the SGA cohort, the NPV calculated for an sFlt‐1/PlGF cut‐off value of 38 was 100% for delivery before 3 weeks, and 98% for delivery before 4 weeks after diagnosis (95% CI 0.89–1.00). In the FGR cohort, the NPV calculated for an sFlt‐1/PlGF cut‐off value of 38 was 100% for delivery before 2 weeks after diagnosis (95% CI 0.92–1.00). By contrast, more than 50% of cases with an sFlt‐1/PlGF value of >85 required an elective delivery before 1 week. CONCLUSIONS: sFlt‐1/PlGF values in early‐onset SGA and FGR are predictive of the time to delivery and could be used for planning fetal surveillance, by reducing the frequency of ultrasound in cases with sFlt‐1/PlGF < 38 and by providing closer follow‐up in cases with sFlt‐1/PlGF >85. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: sFlt‐1/PlGF values in early‐onset SGA/FGR could be used in addition to Doppler for planning fetal surveillance. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-05 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9541486/ /pubmed/35303394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17151 Text en © 2022 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | RESEARCH ARTICLES Bonacina, Erika Mendoza, Manel Farràs, Alba Garcia‐Manau, Pablo Serrano, Berta Hurtado, Ivan Ferrer‐Oliveras, Raquel Illan, Lidia Armengol‐Alsina, Mireia Carreras, Elena Angiogenic factors for planning fetal surveillance in fetal growth restriction and small‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses: A prospective observational study |
title | Angiogenic factors for planning fetal surveillance in fetal growth restriction and small‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses: A prospective observational study |
title_full | Angiogenic factors for planning fetal surveillance in fetal growth restriction and small‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses: A prospective observational study |
title_fullStr | Angiogenic factors for planning fetal surveillance in fetal growth restriction and small‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses: A prospective observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | Angiogenic factors for planning fetal surveillance in fetal growth restriction and small‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses: A prospective observational study |
title_short | Angiogenic factors for planning fetal surveillance in fetal growth restriction and small‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses: A prospective observational study |
title_sort | angiogenic factors for planning fetal surveillance in fetal growth restriction and small‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses: a prospective observational study |
topic | RESEARCH ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35303394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17151 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bonacinaerika angiogenicfactorsforplanningfetalsurveillanceinfetalgrowthrestrictionandsmallforgestationalagefetusesaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT mendozamanel angiogenicfactorsforplanningfetalsurveillanceinfetalgrowthrestrictionandsmallforgestationalagefetusesaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT farrasalba angiogenicfactorsforplanningfetalsurveillanceinfetalgrowthrestrictionandsmallforgestationalagefetusesaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT garciamanaupablo angiogenicfactorsforplanningfetalsurveillanceinfetalgrowthrestrictionandsmallforgestationalagefetusesaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT serranoberta angiogenicfactorsforplanningfetalsurveillanceinfetalgrowthrestrictionandsmallforgestationalagefetusesaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT hurtadoivan angiogenicfactorsforplanningfetalsurveillanceinfetalgrowthrestrictionandsmallforgestationalagefetusesaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT ferreroliverasraquel angiogenicfactorsforplanningfetalsurveillanceinfetalgrowthrestrictionandsmallforgestationalagefetusesaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT illanlidia angiogenicfactorsforplanningfetalsurveillanceinfetalgrowthrestrictionandsmallforgestationalagefetusesaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT armengolalsinamireia angiogenicfactorsforplanningfetalsurveillanceinfetalgrowthrestrictionandsmallforgestationalagefetusesaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT carreraselena angiogenicfactorsforplanningfetalsurveillanceinfetalgrowthrestrictionandsmallforgestationalagefetusesaprospectiveobservationalstudy |