Cargando…

Angiogenic factors for planning fetal surveillance in fetal growth restriction and small‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses: A prospective observational study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the added value of the soluble fms‐like tyrosine kinase‐1 (sFlt‐1) and placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio for adjusting the periodicity of ultrasound examinations in early‐onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) and small for gestational age (SGA). DESIG...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonacina, Erika, Mendoza, Manel, Farràs, Alba, Garcia‐Manau, Pablo, Serrano, Berta, Hurtado, Ivan, Ferrer‐Oliveras, Raquel, Illan, Lidia, Armengol‐Alsina, Mireia, Carreras, Elena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35303394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17151
_version_ 1784803935798689792
author Bonacina, Erika
Mendoza, Manel
Farràs, Alba
Garcia‐Manau, Pablo
Serrano, Berta
Hurtado, Ivan
Ferrer‐Oliveras, Raquel
Illan, Lidia
Armengol‐Alsina, Mireia
Carreras, Elena
author_facet Bonacina, Erika
Mendoza, Manel
Farràs, Alba
Garcia‐Manau, Pablo
Serrano, Berta
Hurtado, Ivan
Ferrer‐Oliveras, Raquel
Illan, Lidia
Armengol‐Alsina, Mireia
Carreras, Elena
author_sort Bonacina, Erika
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the added value of the soluble fms‐like tyrosine kinase‐1 (sFlt‐1) and placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio for adjusting the periodicity of ultrasound examinations in early‐onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) and small for gestational age (SGA). DESIGN: A prospective, observational study. SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital. POPULATION: One hundred and thirty‐four single pregnancies with ultrasonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) below the 10th centile between 20(+0) and 31(+6) weeks of gestation with antegrade umbilical artery flow. METHODS: The time from Doppler and sFlt‐1/PlGF assessment to delivery was recorded and classified into four ranges: <1, <2, <3 and <4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of sFlt‐1/PlGF values to predict the time to delivery. RESULTS: In the SGA cohort, the NPV calculated for an sFlt‐1/PlGF cut‐off value of 38 was 100% for delivery before 3 weeks, and 98% for delivery before 4 weeks after diagnosis (95% CI 0.89–1.00). In the FGR cohort, the NPV calculated for an sFlt‐1/PlGF cut‐off value of 38 was 100% for delivery before 2 weeks after diagnosis (95% CI 0.92–1.00). By contrast, more than 50% of cases with an sFlt‐1/PlGF value of >85 required an elective delivery before 1 week. CONCLUSIONS: sFlt‐1/PlGF values in early‐onset SGA and FGR are predictive of the time to delivery and could be used for planning fetal surveillance, by reducing the frequency of ultrasound in cases with sFlt‐1/PlGF < 38 and by providing closer follow‐up in cases with sFlt‐1/PlGF >85. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: sFlt‐1/PlGF values in early‐onset SGA/FGR could be used in addition to Doppler for planning fetal surveillance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9541486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95414862022-10-14 Angiogenic factors for planning fetal surveillance in fetal growth restriction and small‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses: A prospective observational study Bonacina, Erika Mendoza, Manel Farràs, Alba Garcia‐Manau, Pablo Serrano, Berta Hurtado, Ivan Ferrer‐Oliveras, Raquel Illan, Lidia Armengol‐Alsina, Mireia Carreras, Elena BJOG RESEARCH ARTICLES OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the added value of the soluble fms‐like tyrosine kinase‐1 (sFlt‐1) and placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio for adjusting the periodicity of ultrasound examinations in early‐onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) and small for gestational age (SGA). DESIGN: A prospective, observational study. SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital. POPULATION: One hundred and thirty‐four single pregnancies with ultrasonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) below the 10th centile between 20(+0) and 31(+6) weeks of gestation with antegrade umbilical artery flow. METHODS: The time from Doppler and sFlt‐1/PlGF assessment to delivery was recorded and classified into four ranges: <1, <2, <3 and <4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of sFlt‐1/PlGF values to predict the time to delivery. RESULTS: In the SGA cohort, the NPV calculated for an sFlt‐1/PlGF cut‐off value of 38 was 100% for delivery before 3 weeks, and 98% for delivery before 4 weeks after diagnosis (95% CI 0.89–1.00). In the FGR cohort, the NPV calculated for an sFlt‐1/PlGF cut‐off value of 38 was 100% for delivery before 2 weeks after diagnosis (95% CI 0.92–1.00). By contrast, more than 50% of cases with an sFlt‐1/PlGF value of >85 required an elective delivery before 1 week. CONCLUSIONS: sFlt‐1/PlGF values in early‐onset SGA and FGR are predictive of the time to delivery and could be used for planning fetal surveillance, by reducing the frequency of ultrasound in cases with sFlt‐1/PlGF < 38 and by providing closer follow‐up in cases with sFlt‐1/PlGF >85. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: sFlt‐1/PlGF values in early‐onset SGA/FGR could be used in addition to Doppler for planning fetal surveillance. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-05 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9541486/ /pubmed/35303394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17151 Text en © 2022 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH ARTICLES
Bonacina, Erika
Mendoza, Manel
Farràs, Alba
Garcia‐Manau, Pablo
Serrano, Berta
Hurtado, Ivan
Ferrer‐Oliveras, Raquel
Illan, Lidia
Armengol‐Alsina, Mireia
Carreras, Elena
Angiogenic factors for planning fetal surveillance in fetal growth restriction and small‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses: A prospective observational study
title Angiogenic factors for planning fetal surveillance in fetal growth restriction and small‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses: A prospective observational study
title_full Angiogenic factors for planning fetal surveillance in fetal growth restriction and small‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses: A prospective observational study
title_fullStr Angiogenic factors for planning fetal surveillance in fetal growth restriction and small‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses: A prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Angiogenic factors for planning fetal surveillance in fetal growth restriction and small‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses: A prospective observational study
title_short Angiogenic factors for planning fetal surveillance in fetal growth restriction and small‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses: A prospective observational study
title_sort angiogenic factors for planning fetal surveillance in fetal growth restriction and small‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses: a prospective observational study
topic RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35303394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17151
work_keys_str_mv AT bonacinaerika angiogenicfactorsforplanningfetalsurveillanceinfetalgrowthrestrictionandsmallforgestationalagefetusesaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT mendozamanel angiogenicfactorsforplanningfetalsurveillanceinfetalgrowthrestrictionandsmallforgestationalagefetusesaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT farrasalba angiogenicfactorsforplanningfetalsurveillanceinfetalgrowthrestrictionandsmallforgestationalagefetusesaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT garciamanaupablo angiogenicfactorsforplanningfetalsurveillanceinfetalgrowthrestrictionandsmallforgestationalagefetusesaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT serranoberta angiogenicfactorsforplanningfetalsurveillanceinfetalgrowthrestrictionandsmallforgestationalagefetusesaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT hurtadoivan angiogenicfactorsforplanningfetalsurveillanceinfetalgrowthrestrictionandsmallforgestationalagefetusesaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT ferreroliverasraquel angiogenicfactorsforplanningfetalsurveillanceinfetalgrowthrestrictionandsmallforgestationalagefetusesaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT illanlidia angiogenicfactorsforplanningfetalsurveillanceinfetalgrowthrestrictionandsmallforgestationalagefetusesaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT armengolalsinamireia angiogenicfactorsforplanningfetalsurveillanceinfetalgrowthrestrictionandsmallforgestationalagefetusesaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT carreraselena angiogenicfactorsforplanningfetalsurveillanceinfetalgrowthrestrictionandsmallforgestationalagefetusesaprospectiveobservationalstudy