Cargando…

A multi‐institutional evaluation of small field output factor determination following the recommendations of IAEA/AAPM TRS‐483

PURPOSE: The aim of this work was to test the implementation of small field dosimetry following TRS‐483 and to develop quality assurance procedures for the experimental determination of small field output factors (SFOFs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve different centers provided SFOFs determined with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lechner, Wolfgang, Alfonso, Rodolfo, Arib, Mehenna, Huq, M. Saiful, Ismail, Anas, Kinhikar, Rajesh, Lárraga‐Gutiérrez, José M., Mani, Karthick Raj, Maphumulo, Nkosingiphile, Sauer, Otto A, Shoeir, Shaima, Suriyapee, Sivalee, Christaki, Karen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35717637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.15797
_version_ 1784803941865750528
author Lechner, Wolfgang
Alfonso, Rodolfo
Arib, Mehenna
Huq, M. Saiful
Ismail, Anas
Kinhikar, Rajesh
Lárraga‐Gutiérrez, José M.
Mani, Karthick Raj
Maphumulo, Nkosingiphile
Sauer, Otto A
Shoeir, Shaima
Suriyapee, Sivalee
Christaki, Karen
author_facet Lechner, Wolfgang
Alfonso, Rodolfo
Arib, Mehenna
Huq, M. Saiful
Ismail, Anas
Kinhikar, Rajesh
Lárraga‐Gutiérrez, José M.
Mani, Karthick Raj
Maphumulo, Nkosingiphile
Sauer, Otto A
Shoeir, Shaima
Suriyapee, Sivalee
Christaki, Karen
author_sort Lechner, Wolfgang
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this work was to test the implementation of small field dosimetry following TRS‐483 and to develop quality assurance procedures for the experimental determination of small field output factors (SFOFs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve different centers provided SFOFs determined with various detectors. Various linac models using the beam qualities 6 MV and 10 MV with flattening filter and without flattening filter were utilized to generate square fields down to a nominal field size of 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm. The detectors were positioned at 10 cm depth in water. Depending on the local situation, the source‐to‐surface distance was either set to 90 cm or 100 cm. The SFOFs were normalized to the output of the 10 cm × 10 cm field. The spread of SFOFs measured with different detectors was investigated for each individual linac beam quality and field size. Additionally, linac‐type specific SFOF curves were determined for each beam quality and the SFOFs determined using individual detectors were compared to these curves. Example uncertainty budgets were established for a solid state detector and a micro ionization chamber. RESULTS: The spread of SFOFs for each linac and field was below 5% for all field sizes. With the exception of one linac‐type, the SFOFs of all investigated detectors agreed within 10% with the respective linac‐type SFOF curve, indicating a potential inter‐detector and inter‐linac variability. CONCLUSION: Quality assurance on the SFOF measurements can be done by investigation of the spread of SFOFs measured with multiple detectors and by comparison to linac‐type specific SFOFs. A follow‐up of a measurement session should be conducted if the spread of SFOFs is larger than 5%, 3%, and 2% for field sizes of 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm, 1 cm × 1 cm, and field sizes larger than 2 cm × 2 cm, respectively. Additionally, deviations of measured SFOFs to the linac‐type‐curves of more than 7%, 3%, and 2% for field sizes 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm, 1 cm × 1 cm, and field sizes larger than 1 cm × 1 cm, respectively, should be followed up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9541513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95415132022-10-14 A multi‐institutional evaluation of small field output factor determination following the recommendations of IAEA/AAPM TRS‐483 Lechner, Wolfgang Alfonso, Rodolfo Arib, Mehenna Huq, M. Saiful Ismail, Anas Kinhikar, Rajesh Lárraga‐Gutiérrez, José M. Mani, Karthick Raj Maphumulo, Nkosingiphile Sauer, Otto A Shoeir, Shaima Suriyapee, Sivalee Christaki, Karen Med Phys COMPUTATIONAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DOSIMETRY PURPOSE: The aim of this work was to test the implementation of small field dosimetry following TRS‐483 and to develop quality assurance procedures for the experimental determination of small field output factors (SFOFs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve different centers provided SFOFs determined with various detectors. Various linac models using the beam qualities 6 MV and 10 MV with flattening filter and without flattening filter were utilized to generate square fields down to a nominal field size of 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm. The detectors were positioned at 10 cm depth in water. Depending on the local situation, the source‐to‐surface distance was either set to 90 cm or 100 cm. The SFOFs were normalized to the output of the 10 cm × 10 cm field. The spread of SFOFs measured with different detectors was investigated for each individual linac beam quality and field size. Additionally, linac‐type specific SFOF curves were determined for each beam quality and the SFOFs determined using individual detectors were compared to these curves. Example uncertainty budgets were established for a solid state detector and a micro ionization chamber. RESULTS: The spread of SFOFs for each linac and field was below 5% for all field sizes. With the exception of one linac‐type, the SFOFs of all investigated detectors agreed within 10% with the respective linac‐type SFOF curve, indicating a potential inter‐detector and inter‐linac variability. CONCLUSION: Quality assurance on the SFOF measurements can be done by investigation of the spread of SFOFs measured with multiple detectors and by comparison to linac‐type specific SFOFs. A follow‐up of a measurement session should be conducted if the spread of SFOFs is larger than 5%, 3%, and 2% for field sizes of 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm, 1 cm × 1 cm, and field sizes larger than 2 cm × 2 cm, respectively. Additionally, deviations of measured SFOFs to the linac‐type‐curves of more than 7%, 3%, and 2% for field sizes 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm, 1 cm × 1 cm, and field sizes larger than 1 cm × 1 cm, respectively, should be followed up. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-08 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9541513/ /pubmed/35717637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.15797 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle COMPUTATIONAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DOSIMETRY
Lechner, Wolfgang
Alfonso, Rodolfo
Arib, Mehenna
Huq, M. Saiful
Ismail, Anas
Kinhikar, Rajesh
Lárraga‐Gutiérrez, José M.
Mani, Karthick Raj
Maphumulo, Nkosingiphile
Sauer, Otto A
Shoeir, Shaima
Suriyapee, Sivalee
Christaki, Karen
A multi‐institutional evaluation of small field output factor determination following the recommendations of IAEA/AAPM TRS‐483
title A multi‐institutional evaluation of small field output factor determination following the recommendations of IAEA/AAPM TRS‐483
title_full A multi‐institutional evaluation of small field output factor determination following the recommendations of IAEA/AAPM TRS‐483
title_fullStr A multi‐institutional evaluation of small field output factor determination following the recommendations of IAEA/AAPM TRS‐483
title_full_unstemmed A multi‐institutional evaluation of small field output factor determination following the recommendations of IAEA/AAPM TRS‐483
title_short A multi‐institutional evaluation of small field output factor determination following the recommendations of IAEA/AAPM TRS‐483
title_sort multi‐institutional evaluation of small field output factor determination following the recommendations of iaea/aapm trs‐483
topic COMPUTATIONAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DOSIMETRY
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35717637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.15797
work_keys_str_mv AT lechnerwolfgang amultiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483
AT alfonsorodolfo amultiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483
AT aribmehenna amultiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483
AT huqmsaiful amultiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483
AT ismailanas amultiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483
AT kinhikarrajesh amultiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483
AT larragagutierrezjosem amultiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483
AT manikarthickraj amultiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483
AT maphumulonkosingiphile amultiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483
AT sauerottoa amultiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483
AT shoeirshaima amultiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483
AT suriyapeesivalee amultiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483
AT christakikaren amultiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483
AT lechnerwolfgang multiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483
AT alfonsorodolfo multiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483
AT aribmehenna multiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483
AT huqmsaiful multiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483
AT ismailanas multiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483
AT kinhikarrajesh multiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483
AT larragagutierrezjosem multiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483
AT manikarthickraj multiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483
AT maphumulonkosingiphile multiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483
AT sauerottoa multiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483
AT shoeirshaima multiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483
AT suriyapeesivalee multiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483
AT christakikaren multiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483