Cargando…
A multi‐institutional evaluation of small field output factor determination following the recommendations of IAEA/AAPM TRS‐483
PURPOSE: The aim of this work was to test the implementation of small field dosimetry following TRS‐483 and to develop quality assurance procedures for the experimental determination of small field output factors (SFOFs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve different centers provided SFOFs determined with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35717637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.15797 |
_version_ | 1784803941865750528 |
---|---|
author | Lechner, Wolfgang Alfonso, Rodolfo Arib, Mehenna Huq, M. Saiful Ismail, Anas Kinhikar, Rajesh Lárraga‐Gutiérrez, José M. Mani, Karthick Raj Maphumulo, Nkosingiphile Sauer, Otto A Shoeir, Shaima Suriyapee, Sivalee Christaki, Karen |
author_facet | Lechner, Wolfgang Alfonso, Rodolfo Arib, Mehenna Huq, M. Saiful Ismail, Anas Kinhikar, Rajesh Lárraga‐Gutiérrez, José M. Mani, Karthick Raj Maphumulo, Nkosingiphile Sauer, Otto A Shoeir, Shaima Suriyapee, Sivalee Christaki, Karen |
author_sort | Lechner, Wolfgang |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The aim of this work was to test the implementation of small field dosimetry following TRS‐483 and to develop quality assurance procedures for the experimental determination of small field output factors (SFOFs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve different centers provided SFOFs determined with various detectors. Various linac models using the beam qualities 6 MV and 10 MV with flattening filter and without flattening filter were utilized to generate square fields down to a nominal field size of 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm. The detectors were positioned at 10 cm depth in water. Depending on the local situation, the source‐to‐surface distance was either set to 90 cm or 100 cm. The SFOFs were normalized to the output of the 10 cm × 10 cm field. The spread of SFOFs measured with different detectors was investigated for each individual linac beam quality and field size. Additionally, linac‐type specific SFOF curves were determined for each beam quality and the SFOFs determined using individual detectors were compared to these curves. Example uncertainty budgets were established for a solid state detector and a micro ionization chamber. RESULTS: The spread of SFOFs for each linac and field was below 5% for all field sizes. With the exception of one linac‐type, the SFOFs of all investigated detectors agreed within 10% with the respective linac‐type SFOF curve, indicating a potential inter‐detector and inter‐linac variability. CONCLUSION: Quality assurance on the SFOF measurements can be done by investigation of the spread of SFOFs measured with multiple detectors and by comparison to linac‐type specific SFOFs. A follow‐up of a measurement session should be conducted if the spread of SFOFs is larger than 5%, 3%, and 2% for field sizes of 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm, 1 cm × 1 cm, and field sizes larger than 2 cm × 2 cm, respectively. Additionally, deviations of measured SFOFs to the linac‐type‐curves of more than 7%, 3%, and 2% for field sizes 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm, 1 cm × 1 cm, and field sizes larger than 1 cm × 1 cm, respectively, should be followed up. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9541513 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95415132022-10-14 A multi‐institutional evaluation of small field output factor determination following the recommendations of IAEA/AAPM TRS‐483 Lechner, Wolfgang Alfonso, Rodolfo Arib, Mehenna Huq, M. Saiful Ismail, Anas Kinhikar, Rajesh Lárraga‐Gutiérrez, José M. Mani, Karthick Raj Maphumulo, Nkosingiphile Sauer, Otto A Shoeir, Shaima Suriyapee, Sivalee Christaki, Karen Med Phys COMPUTATIONAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DOSIMETRY PURPOSE: The aim of this work was to test the implementation of small field dosimetry following TRS‐483 and to develop quality assurance procedures for the experimental determination of small field output factors (SFOFs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve different centers provided SFOFs determined with various detectors. Various linac models using the beam qualities 6 MV and 10 MV with flattening filter and without flattening filter were utilized to generate square fields down to a nominal field size of 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm. The detectors were positioned at 10 cm depth in water. Depending on the local situation, the source‐to‐surface distance was either set to 90 cm or 100 cm. The SFOFs were normalized to the output of the 10 cm × 10 cm field. The spread of SFOFs measured with different detectors was investigated for each individual linac beam quality and field size. Additionally, linac‐type specific SFOF curves were determined for each beam quality and the SFOFs determined using individual detectors were compared to these curves. Example uncertainty budgets were established for a solid state detector and a micro ionization chamber. RESULTS: The spread of SFOFs for each linac and field was below 5% for all field sizes. With the exception of one linac‐type, the SFOFs of all investigated detectors agreed within 10% with the respective linac‐type SFOF curve, indicating a potential inter‐detector and inter‐linac variability. CONCLUSION: Quality assurance on the SFOF measurements can be done by investigation of the spread of SFOFs measured with multiple detectors and by comparison to linac‐type specific SFOFs. A follow‐up of a measurement session should be conducted if the spread of SFOFs is larger than 5%, 3%, and 2% for field sizes of 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm, 1 cm × 1 cm, and field sizes larger than 2 cm × 2 cm, respectively. Additionally, deviations of measured SFOFs to the linac‐type‐curves of more than 7%, 3%, and 2% for field sizes 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm, 1 cm × 1 cm, and field sizes larger than 1 cm × 1 cm, respectively, should be followed up. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-08 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9541513/ /pubmed/35717637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.15797 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | COMPUTATIONAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DOSIMETRY Lechner, Wolfgang Alfonso, Rodolfo Arib, Mehenna Huq, M. Saiful Ismail, Anas Kinhikar, Rajesh Lárraga‐Gutiérrez, José M. Mani, Karthick Raj Maphumulo, Nkosingiphile Sauer, Otto A Shoeir, Shaima Suriyapee, Sivalee Christaki, Karen A multi‐institutional evaluation of small field output factor determination following the recommendations of IAEA/AAPM TRS‐483 |
title | A multi‐institutional evaluation of small field output factor determination following the recommendations of IAEA/AAPM TRS‐483 |
title_full | A multi‐institutional evaluation of small field output factor determination following the recommendations of IAEA/AAPM TRS‐483 |
title_fullStr | A multi‐institutional evaluation of small field output factor determination following the recommendations of IAEA/AAPM TRS‐483 |
title_full_unstemmed | A multi‐institutional evaluation of small field output factor determination following the recommendations of IAEA/AAPM TRS‐483 |
title_short | A multi‐institutional evaluation of small field output factor determination following the recommendations of IAEA/AAPM TRS‐483 |
title_sort | multi‐institutional evaluation of small field output factor determination following the recommendations of iaea/aapm trs‐483 |
topic | COMPUTATIONAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DOSIMETRY |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35717637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.15797 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lechnerwolfgang amultiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483 AT alfonsorodolfo amultiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483 AT aribmehenna amultiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483 AT huqmsaiful amultiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483 AT ismailanas amultiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483 AT kinhikarrajesh amultiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483 AT larragagutierrezjosem amultiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483 AT manikarthickraj amultiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483 AT maphumulonkosingiphile amultiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483 AT sauerottoa amultiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483 AT shoeirshaima amultiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483 AT suriyapeesivalee amultiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483 AT christakikaren amultiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483 AT lechnerwolfgang multiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483 AT alfonsorodolfo multiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483 AT aribmehenna multiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483 AT huqmsaiful multiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483 AT ismailanas multiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483 AT kinhikarrajesh multiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483 AT larragagutierrezjosem multiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483 AT manikarthickraj multiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483 AT maphumulonkosingiphile multiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483 AT sauerottoa multiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483 AT shoeirshaima multiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483 AT suriyapeesivalee multiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483 AT christakikaren multiinstitutionalevaluationofsmallfieldoutputfactordeterminationfollowingtherecommendationsofiaeaaapmtrs483 |