Cargando…
Providing social assistance and humanitarian relief: The case for embracing uncertainty
MOTIVATION: Social assistance, humanitarian relief, and disaster response increasingly overlap, especially where recurrent crises and persistent conflicts prevail. In such situations, distinctions between risk and uncertainty become especially important. It is critical for policy and practice to shi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36246579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12613 |
_version_ | 1784803947528060928 |
---|---|
author | Caravani, Matteo Lind, Jeremy Sabates‐Wheeler, Rachel Scoones, Ian |
author_facet | Caravani, Matteo Lind, Jeremy Sabates‐Wheeler, Rachel Scoones, Ian |
author_sort | Caravani, Matteo |
collection | PubMed |
description | MOTIVATION: Social assistance, humanitarian relief, and disaster response increasingly overlap, especially where recurrent crises and persistent conflicts prevail. In such situations, distinctions between risk and uncertainty become especially important. It is critical for policy and practice to shift from focusing on risk assessment and management to embracing uncertainty. PURPOSE: The article assesses the appropriateness of two approaches to social assistance and humanitarian relief where crises recur and conflicts persist: risk assessment and management; and embracing uncertainty and ignorance. METHODS AND APPROACH: The article reviews different approaches to social assistance, humanitarian relief, and disaster response, and asks how they are framed. It draws on experiences from programmes offering social assistance, humanitarian relief, and disaster response, highlighting the professional, bureaucratic, and institutional features that influence programme design and functioning. These are compared with “high‐reliability” approaches deployed in other critical infrastructure—such as water and energy supply. FINDINGS: Mainstream approaches focus on risk assessment and management, assuming predictability and stability. This is problematic, especially in settings of crisis and conflict where there may be no functioning delivery system for social assistance and relief. The article highlights alternatives to the mainstream risk‐focused approaches, which emphasize learning, collaboration, adaptation, and flexibility. Such approaches must build on embedded practices of moral economy, collective action, and mutual care and be supported through professional and institutional capacities that generate reliability. POLICY IMPLICATIONS: The article suggests a new agenda for the intersection of social assistance, humanitarian relief, and disaster response, which makes uncertainty the focus for rethinking responses at scale, especially in settings affected by crisis and conflict. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9541537 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95415372022-10-14 Providing social assistance and humanitarian relief: The case for embracing uncertainty Caravani, Matteo Lind, Jeremy Sabates‐Wheeler, Rachel Scoones, Ian Dev Policy Rev Articles MOTIVATION: Social assistance, humanitarian relief, and disaster response increasingly overlap, especially where recurrent crises and persistent conflicts prevail. In such situations, distinctions between risk and uncertainty become especially important. It is critical for policy and practice to shift from focusing on risk assessment and management to embracing uncertainty. PURPOSE: The article assesses the appropriateness of two approaches to social assistance and humanitarian relief where crises recur and conflicts persist: risk assessment and management; and embracing uncertainty and ignorance. METHODS AND APPROACH: The article reviews different approaches to social assistance, humanitarian relief, and disaster response, and asks how they are framed. It draws on experiences from programmes offering social assistance, humanitarian relief, and disaster response, highlighting the professional, bureaucratic, and institutional features that influence programme design and functioning. These are compared with “high‐reliability” approaches deployed in other critical infrastructure—such as water and energy supply. FINDINGS: Mainstream approaches focus on risk assessment and management, assuming predictability and stability. This is problematic, especially in settings of crisis and conflict where there may be no functioning delivery system for social assistance and relief. The article highlights alternatives to the mainstream risk‐focused approaches, which emphasize learning, collaboration, adaptation, and flexibility. Such approaches must build on embedded practices of moral economy, collective action, and mutual care and be supported through professional and institutional capacities that generate reliability. POLICY IMPLICATIONS: The article suggests a new agenda for the intersection of social assistance, humanitarian relief, and disaster response, which makes uncertainty the focus for rethinking responses at scale, especially in settings affected by crisis and conflict. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-09 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9541537/ /pubmed/36246579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12613 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Development Policy Review published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Overseas Development Institute. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Caravani, Matteo Lind, Jeremy Sabates‐Wheeler, Rachel Scoones, Ian Providing social assistance and humanitarian relief: The case for embracing uncertainty |
title | Providing social assistance and humanitarian relief: The case for embracing uncertainty |
title_full | Providing social assistance and humanitarian relief: The case for embracing uncertainty |
title_fullStr | Providing social assistance and humanitarian relief: The case for embracing uncertainty |
title_full_unstemmed | Providing social assistance and humanitarian relief: The case for embracing uncertainty |
title_short | Providing social assistance and humanitarian relief: The case for embracing uncertainty |
title_sort | providing social assistance and humanitarian relief: the case for embracing uncertainty |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36246579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12613 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caravanimatteo providingsocialassistanceandhumanitarianreliefthecaseforembracinguncertainty AT lindjeremy providingsocialassistanceandhumanitarianreliefthecaseforembracinguncertainty AT sabateswheelerrachel providingsocialassistanceandhumanitarianreliefthecaseforembracinguncertainty AT scoonesian providingsocialassistanceandhumanitarianreliefthecaseforembracinguncertainty |