Cargando…

Investigating the utility of the COM‐B and TM model to explain changes in eating behaviour during pregnancy: A longitudinal cohort study

OBJECTIVES: Pregnancy has been described as a ‘teachable moment’ for behaviour change, which presents an important opportunity for health promotion within antenatal care settings. However, no pregnancy‐specific model has been developed or tested in the context of health behaviour change during pregn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rockliffe, Lauren, Peters, Sarah, Smith, Debbie M., Heal, Calvin, Heazell, Alexander E. P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35297131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12590
_version_ 1784803961015894016
author Rockliffe, Lauren
Peters, Sarah
Smith, Debbie M.
Heal, Calvin
Heazell, Alexander E. P.
author_facet Rockliffe, Lauren
Peters, Sarah
Smith, Debbie M.
Heal, Calvin
Heazell, Alexander E. P.
author_sort Rockliffe, Lauren
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Pregnancy has been described as a ‘teachable moment’ for behaviour change, which presents an important opportunity for health promotion within antenatal care settings. However, no pregnancy‐specific model has been developed or tested in the context of health behaviour change during pregnancy. This study aimed to investigate and compare the utility of the Capability‐Opportunity‐Motivation Behaviour (COM‐B) and Teachable Moments (TM) models, to explain health behaviour change during pregnancy, within the context of eating behaviour. DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study. METHODS: Five hundred and sixteen women completed a survey at between 12–16 weeks gestation (T1). Follow‐up data were collected at 20–24 weeks (T2), 36–40 weeks (T3), and 6–12 weeks postnatally (T4). The primary outcome was eating behaviour. To assess the utility of the COM‐B model, perceived capability, opportunity, and motivation to eat healthily were measured. To assess the utility of the TM model, risk perceptions, self‐image, and affective response were measured. RESULTS: Overall, the COM‐B model explained 18.4% of the variance in eating behaviour, whilst the TM model explained 9%. Both models explained the most variance in eating behaviour at T1 and T3, compared with T2 and T4. Small changes were observed in eating behaviour and the model constructs over the time period studied, although these were not clinically meaningful. CONCLUSIONS: Neither the COM‐B nor TM model provide a satisfactory explanation of eating behaviour during pregnancy, however the findings suggest that certain stages of pregnancy may create more salient opportunities for behaviour change. The findings also support claims that motivation may not play a key role in directing eating behaviour during pregnancy. Further research is needed to explore the role of timing in antenatal behaviour change. The development of a pregnancy‐specific model is necessary to optimise understanding of pregnancy as a teachable moment for behaviour change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9541598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95415982022-10-14 Investigating the utility of the COM‐B and TM model to explain changes in eating behaviour during pregnancy: A longitudinal cohort study Rockliffe, Lauren Peters, Sarah Smith, Debbie M. Heal, Calvin Heazell, Alexander E. P. Br J Health Psychol Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Pregnancy has been described as a ‘teachable moment’ for behaviour change, which presents an important opportunity for health promotion within antenatal care settings. However, no pregnancy‐specific model has been developed or tested in the context of health behaviour change during pregnancy. This study aimed to investigate and compare the utility of the Capability‐Opportunity‐Motivation Behaviour (COM‐B) and Teachable Moments (TM) models, to explain health behaviour change during pregnancy, within the context of eating behaviour. DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study. METHODS: Five hundred and sixteen women completed a survey at between 12–16 weeks gestation (T1). Follow‐up data were collected at 20–24 weeks (T2), 36–40 weeks (T3), and 6–12 weeks postnatally (T4). The primary outcome was eating behaviour. To assess the utility of the COM‐B model, perceived capability, opportunity, and motivation to eat healthily were measured. To assess the utility of the TM model, risk perceptions, self‐image, and affective response were measured. RESULTS: Overall, the COM‐B model explained 18.4% of the variance in eating behaviour, whilst the TM model explained 9%. Both models explained the most variance in eating behaviour at T1 and T3, compared with T2 and T4. Small changes were observed in eating behaviour and the model constructs over the time period studied, although these were not clinically meaningful. CONCLUSIONS: Neither the COM‐B nor TM model provide a satisfactory explanation of eating behaviour during pregnancy, however the findings suggest that certain stages of pregnancy may create more salient opportunities for behaviour change. The findings also support claims that motivation may not play a key role in directing eating behaviour during pregnancy. Further research is needed to explore the role of timing in antenatal behaviour change. The development of a pregnancy‐specific model is necessary to optimise understanding of pregnancy as a teachable moment for behaviour change. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-17 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9541598/ /pubmed/35297131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12590 Text en © 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Health Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Rockliffe, Lauren
Peters, Sarah
Smith, Debbie M.
Heal, Calvin
Heazell, Alexander E. P.
Investigating the utility of the COM‐B and TM model to explain changes in eating behaviour during pregnancy: A longitudinal cohort study
title Investigating the utility of the COM‐B and TM model to explain changes in eating behaviour during pregnancy: A longitudinal cohort study
title_full Investigating the utility of the COM‐B and TM model to explain changes in eating behaviour during pregnancy: A longitudinal cohort study
title_fullStr Investigating the utility of the COM‐B and TM model to explain changes in eating behaviour during pregnancy: A longitudinal cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Investigating the utility of the COM‐B and TM model to explain changes in eating behaviour during pregnancy: A longitudinal cohort study
title_short Investigating the utility of the COM‐B and TM model to explain changes in eating behaviour during pregnancy: A longitudinal cohort study
title_sort investigating the utility of the com‐b and tm model to explain changes in eating behaviour during pregnancy: a longitudinal cohort study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35297131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12590
work_keys_str_mv AT rockliffelauren investigatingtheutilityofthecombandtmmodeltoexplainchangesineatingbehaviourduringpregnancyalongitudinalcohortstudy
AT peterssarah investigatingtheutilityofthecombandtmmodeltoexplainchangesineatingbehaviourduringpregnancyalongitudinalcohortstudy
AT smithdebbiem investigatingtheutilityofthecombandtmmodeltoexplainchangesineatingbehaviourduringpregnancyalongitudinalcohortstudy
AT healcalvin investigatingtheutilityofthecombandtmmodeltoexplainchangesineatingbehaviourduringpregnancyalongitudinalcohortstudy
AT heazellalexanderep investigatingtheutilityofthecombandtmmodeltoexplainchangesineatingbehaviourduringpregnancyalongitudinalcohortstudy