Cargando…
General population normative scores for interpreting the BODY‐Q
The BODY‐Q is a patient‐reported outcome measure used to assess outcomes in patients undergoing weight loss and/or body contouring surgery (BC) following massive weight loss. Normative values for the BODY‐Q are needed to improve data interpretation and enable comparison. Thus, the aim of this study...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35611607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cob.12528 |
_version_ | 1784804013527531520 |
---|---|
author | Dalaei, Farima de Vries, Claire E. E. Poulsen, Lotte Kaur, Manraj N. Pfob, André Mou, Danny Jacobsen, Amalie L. Repo, Jussi P. Salzillo, Rosa Opyrchal, Jakub Klassen, Anne F. Sørensen, Jens Ahm Pusic, Andrea L. |
author_facet | Dalaei, Farima de Vries, Claire E. E. Poulsen, Lotte Kaur, Manraj N. Pfob, André Mou, Danny Jacobsen, Amalie L. Repo, Jussi P. Salzillo, Rosa Opyrchal, Jakub Klassen, Anne F. Sørensen, Jens Ahm Pusic, Andrea L. |
author_sort | Dalaei, Farima |
collection | PubMed |
description | The BODY‐Q is a patient‐reported outcome measure used to assess outcomes in patients undergoing weight loss and/or body contouring surgery (BC) following massive weight loss. Normative values for the BODY‐Q are needed to improve data interpretation and enable comparison. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine normative values for the BODY‐Q. Participants were recruited internationally through two crowdsourcing platforms. The participants were invited to complete the BODY‐Q scales through an URL link provided within the crowdsourcing platforms. General linear analyses were performed to compare normative means between countries and continents adjusted for relevant covariates. Normative reference values were stratified by age, body mass index (BMI), and gender. The BODY‐Q was completed by 4051 (2052 North American and 1999 European) participants. The mean age was 36 years (±14.7 SD) and ranged from 17 to 76 years, the mean BMI was 26.4 (±6.7 SD) kg/m(2), and the sample consisted of 1996 (49.3%) females and 2023 (49.9%) males. Younger age and higher BMI were negatively associated with all BODY‐Q scales (p < .001). This study provides normative values for the BODY‐Q scales to aid in the interpretation of BODY‐Q scores in research and clinical practise. These values enable us to understand the impact of weight loss and BC on patients' lives. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9541838 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95418382022-10-14 General population normative scores for interpreting the BODY‐Q Dalaei, Farima de Vries, Claire E. E. Poulsen, Lotte Kaur, Manraj N. Pfob, André Mou, Danny Jacobsen, Amalie L. Repo, Jussi P. Salzillo, Rosa Opyrchal, Jakub Klassen, Anne F. Sørensen, Jens Ahm Pusic, Andrea L. Clin Obes Original Research Articles The BODY‐Q is a patient‐reported outcome measure used to assess outcomes in patients undergoing weight loss and/or body contouring surgery (BC) following massive weight loss. Normative values for the BODY‐Q are needed to improve data interpretation and enable comparison. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine normative values for the BODY‐Q. Participants were recruited internationally through two crowdsourcing platforms. The participants were invited to complete the BODY‐Q scales through an URL link provided within the crowdsourcing platforms. General linear analyses were performed to compare normative means between countries and continents adjusted for relevant covariates. Normative reference values were stratified by age, body mass index (BMI), and gender. The BODY‐Q was completed by 4051 (2052 North American and 1999 European) participants. The mean age was 36 years (±14.7 SD) and ranged from 17 to 76 years, the mean BMI was 26.4 (±6.7 SD) kg/m(2), and the sample consisted of 1996 (49.3%) females and 2023 (49.9%) males. Younger age and higher BMI were negatively associated with all BODY‐Q scales (p < .001). This study provides normative values for the BODY‐Q scales to aid in the interpretation of BODY‐Q scores in research and clinical practise. These values enable us to understand the impact of weight loss and BC on patients' lives. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022-05-25 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9541838/ /pubmed/35611607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cob.12528 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical Obesity published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of World Obesity Federation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Articles Dalaei, Farima de Vries, Claire E. E. Poulsen, Lotte Kaur, Manraj N. Pfob, André Mou, Danny Jacobsen, Amalie L. Repo, Jussi P. Salzillo, Rosa Opyrchal, Jakub Klassen, Anne F. Sørensen, Jens Ahm Pusic, Andrea L. General population normative scores for interpreting the BODY‐Q |
title | General population normative scores for interpreting the BODY‐Q
|
title_full | General population normative scores for interpreting the BODY‐Q
|
title_fullStr | General population normative scores for interpreting the BODY‐Q
|
title_full_unstemmed | General population normative scores for interpreting the BODY‐Q
|
title_short | General population normative scores for interpreting the BODY‐Q
|
title_sort | general population normative scores for interpreting the body‐q |
topic | Original Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35611607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cob.12528 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dalaeifarima generalpopulationnormativescoresforinterpretingthebodyq AT devriesclaireee generalpopulationnormativescoresforinterpretingthebodyq AT poulsenlotte generalpopulationnormativescoresforinterpretingthebodyq AT kaurmanrajn generalpopulationnormativescoresforinterpretingthebodyq AT pfobandre generalpopulationnormativescoresforinterpretingthebodyq AT moudanny generalpopulationnormativescoresforinterpretingthebodyq AT jacobsenamaliel generalpopulationnormativescoresforinterpretingthebodyq AT repojussip generalpopulationnormativescoresforinterpretingthebodyq AT salzillorosa generalpopulationnormativescoresforinterpretingthebodyq AT opyrchaljakub generalpopulationnormativescoresforinterpretingthebodyq AT klassenannef generalpopulationnormativescoresforinterpretingthebodyq AT sørensenjensahm generalpopulationnormativescoresforinterpretingthebodyq AT pusicandreal generalpopulationnormativescoresforinterpretingthebodyq |