Cargando…

Pharmacogenomic testing: perception of clinical utility, enablers and barriers to adoption in Australian hospitals

BACKGROUND: Despite healthcare professionals (HCP) endorsing the clinical utility of pharmacogenomics testing, use in clinical practice is limited. AIMS: To assess HCP' perceptions of pharmacogenomic testing and identify barriers to implementation. METHODS: HCP involved in prescribing decisions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pearce, Angela, Terrill, Bronwyn, Alffenaar, Jan‐Willem, Patanwala, Asad E., Kummerfeld, Sarah, Day, Richard, Young, Mary‐Anne, Stocker, Sophie L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35191159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imj.15719
_version_ 1784804016066134016
author Pearce, Angela
Terrill, Bronwyn
Alffenaar, Jan‐Willem
Patanwala, Asad E.
Kummerfeld, Sarah
Day, Richard
Young, Mary‐Anne
Stocker, Sophie L.
author_facet Pearce, Angela
Terrill, Bronwyn
Alffenaar, Jan‐Willem
Patanwala, Asad E.
Kummerfeld, Sarah
Day, Richard
Young, Mary‐Anne
Stocker, Sophie L.
author_sort Pearce, Angela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite healthcare professionals (HCP) endorsing the clinical utility of pharmacogenomics testing, use in clinical practice is limited. AIMS: To assess HCP' perceptions of pharmacogenomic testing and identify barriers to implementation. METHODS: HCP involved in prescribing decisions at three hospitals in Sydney, Australia, were invited to participate. The online survey assessed perceptions of pharmacogenomic testing, including: (i) demographic and practice variables; (ii) use, knowledge and confidence; (iii) perceived benefits; (iv) barriers to implementation; and (v) operational and/or system changes and personnel required to implement on site. RESULTS: HCP were predominantly medical practitioners (75/107) and pharmacists (25/107). HCP perceived pharmacogenomic testing was beneficial to identify reasons for drug intolerance (85/95) and risk of side‐effects (86/95). Although testing was considered relevant to their practice (79/100), few HCP (23/100) reported past or intended future use (26/100). Few HCP reported confidence in their ability to identify indications for pharmacogenomic testing (14/107), order tests (19/106) and communicate results with patients (16/107). Lack of clinical practice guidelines (62/79) and knowledge (54/77) were identified as major barriers to implementation of pharmacogenomics. Comprehensive reimbursement for testing and clinical practice guidelines, alongside models‐of‐care involving multidisciplinary teams and local clinical champions were suggested as strategies to facilitate implementation of pharmacogenomic testing into practice. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacogenomic testing was considered important to guide drug selection and dosing decisions. However, limited knowledge, low confidence and an absence of guidelines impede the use of pharmacogenomic testing. Establishment of local resources including multidisciplinary models‐of‐care was suggested to facilitate implementation of pharmacogenomics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9541847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95418472022-10-14 Pharmacogenomic testing: perception of clinical utility, enablers and barriers to adoption in Australian hospitals Pearce, Angela Terrill, Bronwyn Alffenaar, Jan‐Willem Patanwala, Asad E. Kummerfeld, Sarah Day, Richard Young, Mary‐Anne Stocker, Sophie L. Intern Med J Original Articles BACKGROUND: Despite healthcare professionals (HCP) endorsing the clinical utility of pharmacogenomics testing, use in clinical practice is limited. AIMS: To assess HCP' perceptions of pharmacogenomic testing and identify barriers to implementation. METHODS: HCP involved in prescribing decisions at three hospitals in Sydney, Australia, were invited to participate. The online survey assessed perceptions of pharmacogenomic testing, including: (i) demographic and practice variables; (ii) use, knowledge and confidence; (iii) perceived benefits; (iv) barriers to implementation; and (v) operational and/or system changes and personnel required to implement on site. RESULTS: HCP were predominantly medical practitioners (75/107) and pharmacists (25/107). HCP perceived pharmacogenomic testing was beneficial to identify reasons for drug intolerance (85/95) and risk of side‐effects (86/95). Although testing was considered relevant to their practice (79/100), few HCP (23/100) reported past or intended future use (26/100). Few HCP reported confidence in their ability to identify indications for pharmacogenomic testing (14/107), order tests (19/106) and communicate results with patients (16/107). Lack of clinical practice guidelines (62/79) and knowledge (54/77) were identified as major barriers to implementation of pharmacogenomics. Comprehensive reimbursement for testing and clinical practice guidelines, alongside models‐of‐care involving multidisciplinary teams and local clinical champions were suggested as strategies to facilitate implementation of pharmacogenomic testing into practice. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacogenomic testing was considered important to guide drug selection and dosing decisions. However, limited knowledge, low confidence and an absence of guidelines impede the use of pharmacogenomic testing. Establishment of local resources including multidisciplinary models‐of‐care was suggested to facilitate implementation of pharmacogenomics. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-04-05 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9541847/ /pubmed/35191159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imj.15719 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Internal Medicine Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Physicians. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Pearce, Angela
Terrill, Bronwyn
Alffenaar, Jan‐Willem
Patanwala, Asad E.
Kummerfeld, Sarah
Day, Richard
Young, Mary‐Anne
Stocker, Sophie L.
Pharmacogenomic testing: perception of clinical utility, enablers and barriers to adoption in Australian hospitals
title Pharmacogenomic testing: perception of clinical utility, enablers and barriers to adoption in Australian hospitals
title_full Pharmacogenomic testing: perception of clinical utility, enablers and barriers to adoption in Australian hospitals
title_fullStr Pharmacogenomic testing: perception of clinical utility, enablers and barriers to adoption in Australian hospitals
title_full_unstemmed Pharmacogenomic testing: perception of clinical utility, enablers and barriers to adoption in Australian hospitals
title_short Pharmacogenomic testing: perception of clinical utility, enablers and barriers to adoption in Australian hospitals
title_sort pharmacogenomic testing: perception of clinical utility, enablers and barriers to adoption in australian hospitals
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35191159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imj.15719
work_keys_str_mv AT pearceangela pharmacogenomictestingperceptionofclinicalutilityenablersandbarrierstoadoptioninaustralianhospitals
AT terrillbronwyn pharmacogenomictestingperceptionofclinicalutilityenablersandbarrierstoadoptioninaustralianhospitals
AT alffenaarjanwillem pharmacogenomictestingperceptionofclinicalutilityenablersandbarrierstoadoptioninaustralianhospitals
AT patanwalaasade pharmacogenomictestingperceptionofclinicalutilityenablersandbarrierstoadoptioninaustralianhospitals
AT kummerfeldsarah pharmacogenomictestingperceptionofclinicalutilityenablersandbarrierstoadoptioninaustralianhospitals
AT dayrichard pharmacogenomictestingperceptionofclinicalutilityenablersandbarrierstoadoptioninaustralianhospitals
AT youngmaryanne pharmacogenomictestingperceptionofclinicalutilityenablersandbarrierstoadoptioninaustralianhospitals
AT stockersophiel pharmacogenomictestingperceptionofclinicalutilityenablersandbarrierstoadoptioninaustralianhospitals