Cargando…
Systematic review and meta‐analysis: Water type and temperature affect environmental DNA decay
Environmental DNA (eDNA) has been used in a variety of ecological studies and management applications. The rate at which eDNA decays has been widely studied but at present it is difficult to disentangle study‐specific effects from factors that universally affect eDNA degradation. To address this, a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35510730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13627 |
_version_ | 1784804022157312000 |
---|---|
author | Lamb, Philip D. Fonseca, Vera G. Maxwell, David L. Nnanatu, Chibuzor C. |
author_facet | Lamb, Philip D. Fonseca, Vera G. Maxwell, David L. Nnanatu, Chibuzor C. |
author_sort | Lamb, Philip D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Environmental DNA (eDNA) has been used in a variety of ecological studies and management applications. The rate at which eDNA decays has been widely studied but at present it is difficult to disentangle study‐specific effects from factors that universally affect eDNA degradation. To address this, a systematic review and meta‐analysis was conducted on aquatic eDNA studies. Analysis revealed eDNA decayed faster at higher temperatures and in marine environments (as opposed to freshwater). DNA type (mitochondrial or nuclear) and fragment length did not affect eDNA decay rate, although a preference for <200 bp sequences in the available literature means this relationship was not assessed with longer sequences (e.g. >800 bp). At present, factors such as ultraviolet light, pH, and microbial load lacked sufficient studies to feature in the meta‐analysis. Moving forward, we advocate researching these factors to further refine our understanding of eDNA decay in aquatic environments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9541873 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95418732022-10-14 Systematic review and meta‐analysis: Water type and temperature affect environmental DNA decay Lamb, Philip D. Fonseca, Vera G. Maxwell, David L. Nnanatu, Chibuzor C. Mol Ecol Resour Invited Technical Review Environmental DNA (eDNA) has been used in a variety of ecological studies and management applications. The rate at which eDNA decays has been widely studied but at present it is difficult to disentangle study‐specific effects from factors that universally affect eDNA degradation. To address this, a systematic review and meta‐analysis was conducted on aquatic eDNA studies. Analysis revealed eDNA decayed faster at higher temperatures and in marine environments (as opposed to freshwater). DNA type (mitochondrial or nuclear) and fragment length did not affect eDNA decay rate, although a preference for <200 bp sequences in the available literature means this relationship was not assessed with longer sequences (e.g. >800 bp). At present, factors such as ultraviolet light, pH, and microbial load lacked sufficient studies to feature in the meta‐analysis. Moving forward, we advocate researching these factors to further refine our understanding of eDNA decay in aquatic environments. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-22 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9541873/ /pubmed/35510730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13627 Text en © 2022 Crown copyright. Molecular Ecology Resources published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This article is published with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Invited Technical Review Lamb, Philip D. Fonseca, Vera G. Maxwell, David L. Nnanatu, Chibuzor C. Systematic review and meta‐analysis: Water type and temperature affect environmental DNA decay |
title | Systematic review and meta‐analysis: Water type and temperature affect environmental DNA decay |
title_full | Systematic review and meta‐analysis: Water type and temperature affect environmental DNA decay |
title_fullStr | Systematic review and meta‐analysis: Water type and temperature affect environmental DNA decay |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic review and meta‐analysis: Water type and temperature affect environmental DNA decay |
title_short | Systematic review and meta‐analysis: Water type and temperature affect environmental DNA decay |
title_sort | systematic review and meta‐analysis: water type and temperature affect environmental dna decay |
topic | Invited Technical Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35510730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13627 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lambphilipd systematicreviewandmetaanalysiswatertypeandtemperatureaffectenvironmentaldnadecay AT fonsecaverag systematicreviewandmetaanalysiswatertypeandtemperatureaffectenvironmentaldnadecay AT maxwelldavidl systematicreviewandmetaanalysiswatertypeandtemperatureaffectenvironmentaldnadecay AT nnanatuchibuzorc systematicreviewandmetaanalysiswatertypeandtemperatureaffectenvironmentaldnadecay |