Cargando…

Systematic review and meta‐analysis: Water type and temperature affect environmental DNA decay

Environmental DNA (eDNA) has been used in a variety of ecological studies and management applications. The rate at which eDNA decays has been widely studied but at present it is difficult to disentangle study‐specific effects from factors that universally affect eDNA degradation. To address this, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lamb, Philip D., Fonseca, Vera G., Maxwell, David L., Nnanatu, Chibuzor C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35510730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13627
_version_ 1784804022157312000
author Lamb, Philip D.
Fonseca, Vera G.
Maxwell, David L.
Nnanatu, Chibuzor C.
author_facet Lamb, Philip D.
Fonseca, Vera G.
Maxwell, David L.
Nnanatu, Chibuzor C.
author_sort Lamb, Philip D.
collection PubMed
description Environmental DNA (eDNA) has been used in a variety of ecological studies and management applications. The rate at which eDNA decays has been widely studied but at present it is difficult to disentangle study‐specific effects from factors that universally affect eDNA degradation. To address this, a systematic review and meta‐analysis was conducted on aquatic eDNA studies. Analysis revealed eDNA decayed faster at higher temperatures and in marine environments (as opposed to freshwater). DNA type (mitochondrial or nuclear) and fragment length did not affect eDNA decay rate, although a preference for <200 bp sequences in the available literature means this relationship was not assessed with longer sequences (e.g. >800 bp). At present, factors such as ultraviolet light, pH, and microbial load lacked sufficient studies to feature in the meta‐analysis. Moving forward, we advocate researching these factors to further refine our understanding of eDNA decay in aquatic environments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9541873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95418732022-10-14 Systematic review and meta‐analysis: Water type and temperature affect environmental DNA decay Lamb, Philip D. Fonseca, Vera G. Maxwell, David L. Nnanatu, Chibuzor C. Mol Ecol Resour Invited Technical Review Environmental DNA (eDNA) has been used in a variety of ecological studies and management applications. The rate at which eDNA decays has been widely studied but at present it is difficult to disentangle study‐specific effects from factors that universally affect eDNA degradation. To address this, a systematic review and meta‐analysis was conducted on aquatic eDNA studies. Analysis revealed eDNA decayed faster at higher temperatures and in marine environments (as opposed to freshwater). DNA type (mitochondrial or nuclear) and fragment length did not affect eDNA decay rate, although a preference for <200 bp sequences in the available literature means this relationship was not assessed with longer sequences (e.g. >800 bp). At present, factors such as ultraviolet light, pH, and microbial load lacked sufficient studies to feature in the meta‐analysis. Moving forward, we advocate researching these factors to further refine our understanding of eDNA decay in aquatic environments. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-22 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9541873/ /pubmed/35510730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13627 Text en © 2022 Crown copyright. Molecular Ecology Resources published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This article is published with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Invited Technical Review
Lamb, Philip D.
Fonseca, Vera G.
Maxwell, David L.
Nnanatu, Chibuzor C.
Systematic review and meta‐analysis: Water type and temperature affect environmental DNA decay
title Systematic review and meta‐analysis: Water type and temperature affect environmental DNA decay
title_full Systematic review and meta‐analysis: Water type and temperature affect environmental DNA decay
title_fullStr Systematic review and meta‐analysis: Water type and temperature affect environmental DNA decay
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review and meta‐analysis: Water type and temperature affect environmental DNA decay
title_short Systematic review and meta‐analysis: Water type and temperature affect environmental DNA decay
title_sort systematic review and meta‐analysis: water type and temperature affect environmental dna decay
topic Invited Technical Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9541873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35510730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13627
work_keys_str_mv AT lambphilipd systematicreviewandmetaanalysiswatertypeandtemperatureaffectenvironmentaldnadecay
AT fonsecaverag systematicreviewandmetaanalysiswatertypeandtemperatureaffectenvironmentaldnadecay
AT maxwelldavidl systematicreviewandmetaanalysiswatertypeandtemperatureaffectenvironmentaldnadecay
AT nnanatuchibuzorc systematicreviewandmetaanalysiswatertypeandtemperatureaffectenvironmentaldnadecay