Cargando…
A review of gynaecological surgical practices for trainees and certified specialists in Australia by volume using MBS and AIHW databases
BACKGROUND: There is a finite volume of surgery performed annually by trainees and certified specialists alike. The detailed assessment of this surgical substrate is important, since it guides true exposure in gynaecological surgical training and practice after fellowship. AIMS: This study quantifie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9542106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35474508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13523 |
_version_ | 1784804075514101760 |
---|---|
author | McCormack, Lalla Nesbitt‐Hawes, Erin Deans, Rebecca Alonso, Anais Lim, Claire Li, Fiona Knapman, Blake Abbott, Jason A. |
author_facet | McCormack, Lalla Nesbitt‐Hawes, Erin Deans, Rebecca Alonso, Anais Lim, Claire Li, Fiona Knapman, Blake Abbott, Jason A. |
author_sort | McCormack, Lalla |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is a finite volume of surgery performed annually by trainees and certified specialists alike. The detailed assessment of this surgical substrate is important, since it guides true exposure in gynaecological surgical training and practice after fellowship. AIMS: This study quantifies the volume and profile of major gynaecological surgical procedures performed in Australia within a specified five‐year period and discusses the implications for training and practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare data were examined to quantify the total number of major gynaecological procedures performed between 2013 and 2018. Medicare data were analysed to quantify the number of billed procedures. These data were compared with published Australian RANZCOG trainees and operative gynaecologists, to estimate the potential annual average exposure for each procedure. RESULTS: Major open, laparoscopic and vaginal surgeries constitute less than 27% of the 600 000 gynaecological procedures performed annually in Australia. Most major gynaecological surgeries are performed at rates lower than 12 cases per year for both trainees and specialists. Over the study period, laparotomies, vaginal hysterectomies and continence procedures decreased, and operative laparoscopies and laparoscopic hysterectomies increased. CONCLUSIONS: The volume of available major gynaecological procedures in Australia may not allow sufficient exposure for optimal training and practice for all trainees and specialists in operative gynaecology. This shortfall may compromise the ability to obtain and maintain proficiency in some core gynaecological operative procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9542106 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95421062022-10-14 A review of gynaecological surgical practices for trainees and certified specialists in Australia by volume using MBS and AIHW databases McCormack, Lalla Nesbitt‐Hawes, Erin Deans, Rebecca Alonso, Anais Lim, Claire Li, Fiona Knapman, Blake Abbott, Jason A. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol Original Articles BACKGROUND: There is a finite volume of surgery performed annually by trainees and certified specialists alike. The detailed assessment of this surgical substrate is important, since it guides true exposure in gynaecological surgical training and practice after fellowship. AIMS: This study quantifies the volume and profile of major gynaecological surgical procedures performed in Australia within a specified five‐year period and discusses the implications for training and practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare data were examined to quantify the total number of major gynaecological procedures performed between 2013 and 2018. Medicare data were analysed to quantify the number of billed procedures. These data were compared with published Australian RANZCOG trainees and operative gynaecologists, to estimate the potential annual average exposure for each procedure. RESULTS: Major open, laparoscopic and vaginal surgeries constitute less than 27% of the 600 000 gynaecological procedures performed annually in Australia. Most major gynaecological surgeries are performed at rates lower than 12 cases per year for both trainees and specialists. Over the study period, laparotomies, vaginal hysterectomies and continence procedures decreased, and operative laparoscopies and laparoscopic hysterectomies increased. CONCLUSIONS: The volume of available major gynaecological procedures in Australia may not allow sufficient exposure for optimal training and practice for all trainees and specialists in operative gynaecology. This shortfall may compromise the ability to obtain and maintain proficiency in some core gynaecological operative procedures. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-26 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9542106/ /pubmed/35474508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13523 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles McCormack, Lalla Nesbitt‐Hawes, Erin Deans, Rebecca Alonso, Anais Lim, Claire Li, Fiona Knapman, Blake Abbott, Jason A. A review of gynaecological surgical practices for trainees and certified specialists in Australia by volume using MBS and AIHW databases |
title | A review of gynaecological surgical practices for trainees and certified specialists in Australia by volume using MBS and AIHW databases |
title_full | A review of gynaecological surgical practices for trainees and certified specialists in Australia by volume using MBS and AIHW databases |
title_fullStr | A review of gynaecological surgical practices for trainees and certified specialists in Australia by volume using MBS and AIHW databases |
title_full_unstemmed | A review of gynaecological surgical practices for trainees and certified specialists in Australia by volume using MBS and AIHW databases |
title_short | A review of gynaecological surgical practices for trainees and certified specialists in Australia by volume using MBS and AIHW databases |
title_sort | review of gynaecological surgical practices for trainees and certified specialists in australia by volume using mbs and aihw databases |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9542106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35474508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13523 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mccormacklalla areviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases AT nesbitthaweserin areviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases AT deansrebecca areviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases AT alonsoanais areviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases AT limclaire areviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases AT lifiona areviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases AT knapmanblake areviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases AT abbottjasona areviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases AT mccormacklalla reviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases AT nesbitthaweserin reviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases AT deansrebecca reviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases AT alonsoanais reviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases AT limclaire reviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases AT lifiona reviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases AT knapmanblake reviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases AT abbottjasona reviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases |