Cargando…

A review of gynaecological surgical practices for trainees and certified specialists in Australia by volume using MBS and AIHW databases

BACKGROUND: There is a finite volume of surgery performed annually by trainees and certified specialists alike. The detailed assessment of this surgical substrate is important, since it guides true exposure in gynaecological surgical training and practice after fellowship. AIMS: This study quantifie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCormack, Lalla, Nesbitt‐Hawes, Erin, Deans, Rebecca, Alonso, Anais, Lim, Claire, Li, Fiona, Knapman, Blake, Abbott, Jason A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9542106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35474508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13523
_version_ 1784804075514101760
author McCormack, Lalla
Nesbitt‐Hawes, Erin
Deans, Rebecca
Alonso, Anais
Lim, Claire
Li, Fiona
Knapman, Blake
Abbott, Jason A.
author_facet McCormack, Lalla
Nesbitt‐Hawes, Erin
Deans, Rebecca
Alonso, Anais
Lim, Claire
Li, Fiona
Knapman, Blake
Abbott, Jason A.
author_sort McCormack, Lalla
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a finite volume of surgery performed annually by trainees and certified specialists alike. The detailed assessment of this surgical substrate is important, since it guides true exposure in gynaecological surgical training and practice after fellowship. AIMS: This study quantifies the volume and profile of major gynaecological surgical procedures performed in Australia within a specified five‐year period and discusses the implications for training and practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare data were examined to quantify the total number of major gynaecological procedures performed between 2013 and 2018. Medicare data were analysed to quantify the number of billed procedures. These data were compared with published Australian RANZCOG trainees and operative gynaecologists, to estimate the potential annual average exposure for each procedure. RESULTS: Major open, laparoscopic and vaginal surgeries constitute less than 27% of the 600 000 gynaecological procedures performed annually in Australia. Most major gynaecological surgeries are performed at rates lower than 12 cases per year for both trainees and specialists. Over the study period, laparotomies, vaginal hysterectomies and continence procedures decreased, and operative laparoscopies and laparoscopic hysterectomies increased. CONCLUSIONS: The volume of available major gynaecological procedures in Australia may not allow sufficient exposure for optimal training and practice for all trainees and specialists in operative gynaecology. This shortfall may compromise the ability to obtain and maintain proficiency in some core gynaecological operative procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9542106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95421062022-10-14 A review of gynaecological surgical practices for trainees and certified specialists in Australia by volume using MBS and AIHW databases McCormack, Lalla Nesbitt‐Hawes, Erin Deans, Rebecca Alonso, Anais Lim, Claire Li, Fiona Knapman, Blake Abbott, Jason A. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol Original Articles BACKGROUND: There is a finite volume of surgery performed annually by trainees and certified specialists alike. The detailed assessment of this surgical substrate is important, since it guides true exposure in gynaecological surgical training and practice after fellowship. AIMS: This study quantifies the volume and profile of major gynaecological surgical procedures performed in Australia within a specified five‐year period and discusses the implications for training and practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare data were examined to quantify the total number of major gynaecological procedures performed between 2013 and 2018. Medicare data were analysed to quantify the number of billed procedures. These data were compared with published Australian RANZCOG trainees and operative gynaecologists, to estimate the potential annual average exposure for each procedure. RESULTS: Major open, laparoscopic and vaginal surgeries constitute less than 27% of the 600 000 gynaecological procedures performed annually in Australia. Most major gynaecological surgeries are performed at rates lower than 12 cases per year for both trainees and specialists. Over the study period, laparotomies, vaginal hysterectomies and continence procedures decreased, and operative laparoscopies and laparoscopic hysterectomies increased. CONCLUSIONS: The volume of available major gynaecological procedures in Australia may not allow sufficient exposure for optimal training and practice for all trainees and specialists in operative gynaecology. This shortfall may compromise the ability to obtain and maintain proficiency in some core gynaecological operative procedures. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-26 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9542106/ /pubmed/35474508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13523 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
McCormack, Lalla
Nesbitt‐Hawes, Erin
Deans, Rebecca
Alonso, Anais
Lim, Claire
Li, Fiona
Knapman, Blake
Abbott, Jason A.
A review of gynaecological surgical practices for trainees and certified specialists in Australia by volume using MBS and AIHW databases
title A review of gynaecological surgical practices for trainees and certified specialists in Australia by volume using MBS and AIHW databases
title_full A review of gynaecological surgical practices for trainees and certified specialists in Australia by volume using MBS and AIHW databases
title_fullStr A review of gynaecological surgical practices for trainees and certified specialists in Australia by volume using MBS and AIHW databases
title_full_unstemmed A review of gynaecological surgical practices for trainees and certified specialists in Australia by volume using MBS and AIHW databases
title_short A review of gynaecological surgical practices for trainees and certified specialists in Australia by volume using MBS and AIHW databases
title_sort review of gynaecological surgical practices for trainees and certified specialists in australia by volume using mbs and aihw databases
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9542106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35474508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13523
work_keys_str_mv AT mccormacklalla areviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases
AT nesbitthaweserin areviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases
AT deansrebecca areviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases
AT alonsoanais areviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases
AT limclaire areviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases
AT lifiona areviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases
AT knapmanblake areviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases
AT abbottjasona areviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases
AT mccormacklalla reviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases
AT nesbitthaweserin reviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases
AT deansrebecca reviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases
AT alonsoanais reviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases
AT limclaire reviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases
AT lifiona reviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases
AT knapmanblake reviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases
AT abbottjasona reviewofgynaecologicalsurgicalpracticesfortraineesandcertifiedspecialistsinaustraliabyvolumeusingmbsandaihwdatabases