Cargando…

The SYMPTOM‐upper gastrointestinal study: A mixed methods study exploring symptom appraisal and help‐seeking in Australian upper gastrointestinal cancer patients

OBJECTIVE: There is limited evidence on the development of pancreatic and oesophagogastric cancer, how patients decide to seek help and the factors impacting help‐seeking. Our study, the first in Australia, aimed to explore symptom appraisal and diagnostic pathways in these patients. A secondary aim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karnchanachari, Napin, Milton, Shakira, Muhlen‐Schulte, Tjuntu, Scarborough, Riati, Holland, Jennifer F., Walter, Fiona M., Zalcberg, John, Emery, Jon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9542126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35523160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13605
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: There is limited evidence on the development of pancreatic and oesophagogastric cancer, how patients decide to seek help and the factors impacting help‐seeking. Our study, the first in Australia, aimed to explore symptom appraisal and diagnostic pathways in these patients. A secondary aim was to examine the potential to recruit cancer patients through a cancer quality registry. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with pancreatic or oesophagogastric cancer were recruited through Monash University's Upper‐Gastrointestinal Cancer Registry. Data collected through general practitioners (GP) and patient questionnaires included symptoms and their onset, whereas patient interviews focused on the patient's decision‐making in seeking help from healthcare pracitioners. Data collection and analysis was informed by the Aarhus statement. Coding was inductive, and themes were mapped onto the Model of Pathways to Treatment. RESULTS: Between November 2018 and March 2020, 27 patient questionnaires and 13 phone interviews were completed. Prior to diagnosis, patients lacked awareness of pancreatic and oesophagogastric cancer symptoms, leading to the normalisation, dismissal and misattribution of the symptoms. Patients initially self‐managed symptoms, but worsening of symptoms and jaundice triggered help‐seeking. Competing priorities, beliefs about illnesses and difficulties accessing healthcare delayed help‐seeking. CONCLUSION: Increased awareness of insidious pancreatic and oesophagogastric cancer symptoms in patients and general practitioners may prompt more urgent investigations and lead to earlier diagnosis.