Cargando…
Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis in elderly patients – is advanced age a contraindication?
AIM: We aimed to determine pouch function and retention rate for restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC) in elderly patients. METHODS: We identified patients over 50 years old subjected to IPAA for confirmed pathological UC from 1980 until 201...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9542127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35434821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.17728 |
_version_ | 1784804080155099136 |
---|---|
author | Duraes, Leonardo C. Liang, Jennifer Steele, Scott R. Cengiz, Bora Delaney, Conor P. Holubar, Stefan D. Gorgun, Emre |
author_facet | Duraes, Leonardo C. Liang, Jennifer Steele, Scott R. Cengiz, Bora Delaney, Conor P. Holubar, Stefan D. Gorgun, Emre |
author_sort | Duraes, Leonardo C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: We aimed to determine pouch function and retention rate for restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC) in elderly patients. METHODS: We identified patients over 50 years old subjected to IPAA for confirmed pathological UC from 1980 until 2016. Patients were grouped according to age: 50–59, 60–69 and 70+ years. Short and long‐term outcomes and quality of life (QOL) were compared among the groups. RESULTS: Six hundred and one patients were identified (399 (66.4%) between 50–59 181 (30.1%) between 60–69, and 21 (3.5%) over 70 years of age). More males were in the 70+ arm, and more two‐stage procedures were performed in this group. Wound infection increased with age (P = 0.023). There was a trend of more fistula and pouchitis in the 70+ patients (P = 0.052 and P = 0.055, respectively). Pouch failure rate increased with age, and it was statistically significant in the 70+ cohort (P = 0.015). Multivariate stepwise logistic regression showed that pelvic sepsis (HR 4.8 (95% CI 1.5–15.4), P = 0.009), fistula (HR 6.0 (95% CI 1.7–21.5), and mucosectomy with handsewn anastomosis (HR 4.5 (95% CI 1.4–14.7)), were independently associated with pouch failure. No difference was observed in the QOL among the groups, but pouch function was better for patients younger than 60 years. CONCLUSION: In elderly patients with UC, IPAA may be offered with reasonable functional outcomes, and ileal pouch retention rates, as an alternative to the permanent stoma. Stapled anastomosis increases the chance of pouch retention and should be recommended as long as the distal rectum does not carry dysplasia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9542127 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95421272022-10-14 Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis in elderly patients – is advanced age a contraindication? Duraes, Leonardo C. Liang, Jennifer Steele, Scott R. Cengiz, Bora Delaney, Conor P. Holubar, Stefan D. Gorgun, Emre ANZ J Surg Colorectal Surgery AIM: We aimed to determine pouch function and retention rate for restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC) in elderly patients. METHODS: We identified patients over 50 years old subjected to IPAA for confirmed pathological UC from 1980 until 2016. Patients were grouped according to age: 50–59, 60–69 and 70+ years. Short and long‐term outcomes and quality of life (QOL) were compared among the groups. RESULTS: Six hundred and one patients were identified (399 (66.4%) between 50–59 181 (30.1%) between 60–69, and 21 (3.5%) over 70 years of age). More males were in the 70+ arm, and more two‐stage procedures were performed in this group. Wound infection increased with age (P = 0.023). There was a trend of more fistula and pouchitis in the 70+ patients (P = 0.052 and P = 0.055, respectively). Pouch failure rate increased with age, and it was statistically significant in the 70+ cohort (P = 0.015). Multivariate stepwise logistic regression showed that pelvic sepsis (HR 4.8 (95% CI 1.5–15.4), P = 0.009), fistula (HR 6.0 (95% CI 1.7–21.5), and mucosectomy with handsewn anastomosis (HR 4.5 (95% CI 1.4–14.7)), were independently associated with pouch failure. No difference was observed in the QOL among the groups, but pouch function was better for patients younger than 60 years. CONCLUSION: In elderly patients with UC, IPAA may be offered with reasonable functional outcomes, and ileal pouch retention rates, as an alternative to the permanent stoma. Stapled anastomosis increases the chance of pouch retention and should be recommended as long as the distal rectum does not carry dysplasia. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-04-18 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9542127/ /pubmed/35434821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.17728 Text en © 2022 The Authors. ANZ Journal of Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Colorectal Surgery Duraes, Leonardo C. Liang, Jennifer Steele, Scott R. Cengiz, Bora Delaney, Conor P. Holubar, Stefan D. Gorgun, Emre Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis in elderly patients – is advanced age a contraindication? |
title | Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis in elderly patients – is advanced age a contraindication? |
title_full | Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis in elderly patients – is advanced age a contraindication? |
title_fullStr | Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis in elderly patients – is advanced age a contraindication? |
title_full_unstemmed | Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis in elderly patients – is advanced age a contraindication? |
title_short | Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis in elderly patients – is advanced age a contraindication? |
title_sort | restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis in elderly patients – is advanced age a contraindication? |
topic | Colorectal Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9542127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35434821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.17728 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duraesleonardoc restorativeproctocolectomywithilealpouchanalanastomosisinelderlypatientsisadvancedageacontraindication AT liangjennifer restorativeproctocolectomywithilealpouchanalanastomosisinelderlypatientsisadvancedageacontraindication AT steelescottr restorativeproctocolectomywithilealpouchanalanastomosisinelderlypatientsisadvancedageacontraindication AT cengizbora restorativeproctocolectomywithilealpouchanalanastomosisinelderlypatientsisadvancedageacontraindication AT delaneyconorp restorativeproctocolectomywithilealpouchanalanastomosisinelderlypatientsisadvancedageacontraindication AT holubarstefand restorativeproctocolectomywithilealpouchanalanastomosisinelderlypatientsisadvancedageacontraindication AT gorgunemre restorativeproctocolectomywithilealpouchanalanastomosisinelderlypatientsisadvancedageacontraindication |