Cargando…

Prioritizing Pharmaceutical Contaminants in Great Lakes Tributaries Using Risk‐Based Screening Techniques

In a study of 44 diverse sampling sites across 16 Great Lakes tributaries, 110 pharmaceuticals were detected of 257 monitored. The present study evaluated the ecological relevance of detected chemicals and identified heavily impacted areas to help inform resource managers and guide future investigat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pronschinske, Matthew A., Corsi, Steven R., DeCicco, Laura A., Furlong, Edward T., Ankley, Gerald T., Blackwell, Brett R., Villeneuve, Daniel L., Lenaker, Peter L., Nott, Michelle A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9542422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35852176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.5403
_version_ 1784804144810295296
author Pronschinske, Matthew A.
Corsi, Steven R.
DeCicco, Laura A.
Furlong, Edward T.
Ankley, Gerald T.
Blackwell, Brett R.
Villeneuve, Daniel L.
Lenaker, Peter L.
Nott, Michelle A.
author_facet Pronschinske, Matthew A.
Corsi, Steven R.
DeCicco, Laura A.
Furlong, Edward T.
Ankley, Gerald T.
Blackwell, Brett R.
Villeneuve, Daniel L.
Lenaker, Peter L.
Nott, Michelle A.
author_sort Pronschinske, Matthew A.
collection PubMed
description In a study of 44 diverse sampling sites across 16 Great Lakes tributaries, 110 pharmaceuticals were detected of 257 monitored. The present study evaluated the ecological relevance of detected chemicals and identified heavily impacted areas to help inform resource managers and guide future investigations. Ten pharmaceuticals (caffeine, nicotine, albuterol, sulfamethoxazole, venlafaxine, acetaminophen, carbamazepine, gemfibrozil, metoprolol, and thiabendazole) were distinguished as having the greatest potential for biological effects based on comparison to screening‐level benchmarks derived using information from two biological effects databases, the ECOTOX Knowledgebase and the ToxCast database. Available evidence did not suggest substantial concern for 75% of the monitored pharmaceuticals, including 147 undetected pharmaceuticals and 49 pharmaceuticals with screening‐level alternative benchmarks. However, because of a lack of biological effects information, screening values were not available for 51 detected pharmaceuticals. Samples containing the greatest pharmaceutical concentrations and having the highest detection frequencies were from Lake Erie, southern Lake Michigan, and Lake Huron tributaries. Samples collected during low‐flow periods had higher pharmaceutical concentrations than those collected during increased‐flow periods. The wastewater‐treatment plant effluent content in streams correlated positively with pharmaceutical concentrations. However, deviation from this correlation demonstrated that secondary factors, such as multiple pharmaceutical sources, were likely present at some sites. Further research could investigate high‐priority pharmaceuticals as well as those for which alternative benchmarks could not be developed. Environ Toxicol Chem 2022;41:2221–2239. Published 2022. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9542422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95424222022-10-14 Prioritizing Pharmaceutical Contaminants in Great Lakes Tributaries Using Risk‐Based Screening Techniques Pronschinske, Matthew A. Corsi, Steven R. DeCicco, Laura A. Furlong, Edward T. Ankley, Gerald T. Blackwell, Brett R. Villeneuve, Daniel L. Lenaker, Peter L. Nott, Michelle A. Environ Toxicol Chem Hazard/Risk Assessment In a study of 44 diverse sampling sites across 16 Great Lakes tributaries, 110 pharmaceuticals were detected of 257 monitored. The present study evaluated the ecological relevance of detected chemicals and identified heavily impacted areas to help inform resource managers and guide future investigations. Ten pharmaceuticals (caffeine, nicotine, albuterol, sulfamethoxazole, venlafaxine, acetaminophen, carbamazepine, gemfibrozil, metoprolol, and thiabendazole) were distinguished as having the greatest potential for biological effects based on comparison to screening‐level benchmarks derived using information from two biological effects databases, the ECOTOX Knowledgebase and the ToxCast database. Available evidence did not suggest substantial concern for 75% of the monitored pharmaceuticals, including 147 undetected pharmaceuticals and 49 pharmaceuticals with screening‐level alternative benchmarks. However, because of a lack of biological effects information, screening values were not available for 51 detected pharmaceuticals. Samples containing the greatest pharmaceutical concentrations and having the highest detection frequencies were from Lake Erie, southern Lake Michigan, and Lake Huron tributaries. Samples collected during low‐flow periods had higher pharmaceutical concentrations than those collected during increased‐flow periods. The wastewater‐treatment plant effluent content in streams correlated positively with pharmaceutical concentrations. However, deviation from this correlation demonstrated that secondary factors, such as multiple pharmaceutical sources, were likely present at some sites. Further research could investigate high‐priority pharmaceuticals as well as those for which alternative benchmarks could not be developed. Environ Toxicol Chem 2022;41:2221–2239. Published 2022. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-21 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9542422/ /pubmed/35852176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.5403 Text en Published 2022. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Hazard/Risk Assessment
Pronschinske, Matthew A.
Corsi, Steven R.
DeCicco, Laura A.
Furlong, Edward T.
Ankley, Gerald T.
Blackwell, Brett R.
Villeneuve, Daniel L.
Lenaker, Peter L.
Nott, Michelle A.
Prioritizing Pharmaceutical Contaminants in Great Lakes Tributaries Using Risk‐Based Screening Techniques
title Prioritizing Pharmaceutical Contaminants in Great Lakes Tributaries Using Risk‐Based Screening Techniques
title_full Prioritizing Pharmaceutical Contaminants in Great Lakes Tributaries Using Risk‐Based Screening Techniques
title_fullStr Prioritizing Pharmaceutical Contaminants in Great Lakes Tributaries Using Risk‐Based Screening Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Prioritizing Pharmaceutical Contaminants in Great Lakes Tributaries Using Risk‐Based Screening Techniques
title_short Prioritizing Pharmaceutical Contaminants in Great Lakes Tributaries Using Risk‐Based Screening Techniques
title_sort prioritizing pharmaceutical contaminants in great lakes tributaries using risk‐based screening techniques
topic Hazard/Risk Assessment
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9542422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35852176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.5403
work_keys_str_mv AT pronschinskematthewa prioritizingpharmaceuticalcontaminantsingreatlakestributariesusingriskbasedscreeningtechniques
AT corsistevenr prioritizingpharmaceuticalcontaminantsingreatlakestributariesusingriskbasedscreeningtechniques
AT deciccolauraa prioritizingpharmaceuticalcontaminantsingreatlakestributariesusingriskbasedscreeningtechniques
AT furlongedwardt prioritizingpharmaceuticalcontaminantsingreatlakestributariesusingriskbasedscreeningtechniques
AT ankleygeraldt prioritizingpharmaceuticalcontaminantsingreatlakestributariesusingriskbasedscreeningtechniques
AT blackwellbrettr prioritizingpharmaceuticalcontaminantsingreatlakestributariesusingriskbasedscreeningtechniques
AT villeneuvedaniell prioritizingpharmaceuticalcontaminantsingreatlakestributariesusingriskbasedscreeningtechniques
AT lenakerpeterl prioritizingpharmaceuticalcontaminantsingreatlakestributariesusingriskbasedscreeningtechniques
AT nottmichellea prioritizingpharmaceuticalcontaminantsingreatlakestributariesusingriskbasedscreeningtechniques