Cargando…
“Flipped” clinical rotations: A novel approach
BACKGROUND: Near the beginning of the COVID‐19 pandemic in the United States, medical students were pulled out of all in‐person patient care activities. This resulted in massive disruption to the required clinical rotations (clerkships), necessitating creative curricular solutions to ensure continue...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9542514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35932194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tct.13520 |
_version_ | 1784804167413399552 |
---|---|
author | Xiong, Wei Singh, Simran Wilson‐Delfosse, Amy Jones, Robert Nielsen, Craig Chalkley, Carol Logio, Lia |
author_facet | Xiong, Wei Singh, Simran Wilson‐Delfosse, Amy Jones, Robert Nielsen, Craig Chalkley, Carol Logio, Lia |
author_sort | Xiong, Wei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Near the beginning of the COVID‐19 pandemic in the United States, medical students were pulled out of all in‐person patient care activities. This resulted in massive disruption to the required clinical rotations (clerkships), necessitating creative curricular solutions to ensure continued education for medical students. APPROACH: In response to the lockout, our school adopted a “flipped” clinical rotations model that assigned students to remote learning activities prior to in‐person patient care activities. This approach allowed students to continue their clinical education virtually with a focus on knowledge for practice while awaiting return to the shortened in‐person portions of their rotation. In planning the modified clinical curriculum, educational leaders adhered to several guiding principles including ensuring flexible remote curricular components that would engage students in active learning, designating that no rotation would be completely virtual, and completing virtual educational activities and standardised exams before students returned to in‐person experiences. EVALUATION: End of rotation evaluations and standardised exam scores were analysed to determine the effectiveness of this model. Despite the disruption associated with the pandemic and the rapid implementation of the “flipped” rotations, students continued to rate the overall experiences as highly as traditional clinical rotations. Students also performed similarly on standardised exams when compared to cohorts from other classes at the same experience level. IMPLICATIONS: While borne out of necessity during a pandemic, the lessons learned from our implementation of a “flipped” rotations model can be applied to address problems of capacity and clinical preparedness in the clinical setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9542514 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95425142022-10-14 “Flipped” clinical rotations: A novel approach Xiong, Wei Singh, Simran Wilson‐Delfosse, Amy Jones, Robert Nielsen, Craig Chalkley, Carol Logio, Lia Clin Teach Innovation, Implementation, Improvement BACKGROUND: Near the beginning of the COVID‐19 pandemic in the United States, medical students were pulled out of all in‐person patient care activities. This resulted in massive disruption to the required clinical rotations (clerkships), necessitating creative curricular solutions to ensure continued education for medical students. APPROACH: In response to the lockout, our school adopted a “flipped” clinical rotations model that assigned students to remote learning activities prior to in‐person patient care activities. This approach allowed students to continue their clinical education virtually with a focus on knowledge for practice while awaiting return to the shortened in‐person portions of their rotation. In planning the modified clinical curriculum, educational leaders adhered to several guiding principles including ensuring flexible remote curricular components that would engage students in active learning, designating that no rotation would be completely virtual, and completing virtual educational activities and standardised exams before students returned to in‐person experiences. EVALUATION: End of rotation evaluations and standardised exam scores were analysed to determine the effectiveness of this model. Despite the disruption associated with the pandemic and the rapid implementation of the “flipped” rotations, students continued to rate the overall experiences as highly as traditional clinical rotations. Students also performed similarly on standardised exams when compared to cohorts from other classes at the same experience level. IMPLICATIONS: While borne out of necessity during a pandemic, the lessons learned from our implementation of a “flipped” rotations model can be applied to address problems of capacity and clinical preparedness in the clinical setting. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-06 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9542514/ /pubmed/35932194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tct.13520 Text en © 2022 The Authors. The Clinical Teacher published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Innovation, Implementation, Improvement Xiong, Wei Singh, Simran Wilson‐Delfosse, Amy Jones, Robert Nielsen, Craig Chalkley, Carol Logio, Lia “Flipped” clinical rotations: A novel approach |
title | “Flipped” clinical rotations: A novel approach |
title_full | “Flipped” clinical rotations: A novel approach |
title_fullStr | “Flipped” clinical rotations: A novel approach |
title_full_unstemmed | “Flipped” clinical rotations: A novel approach |
title_short | “Flipped” clinical rotations: A novel approach |
title_sort | “flipped” clinical rotations: a novel approach |
topic | Innovation, Implementation, Improvement |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9542514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35932194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tct.13520 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiongwei flippedclinicalrotationsanovelapproach AT singhsimran flippedclinicalrotationsanovelapproach AT wilsondelfosseamy flippedclinicalrotationsanovelapproach AT jonesrobert flippedclinicalrotationsanovelapproach AT nielsencraig flippedclinicalrotationsanovelapproach AT chalkleycarol flippedclinicalrotationsanovelapproach AT logiolia flippedclinicalrotationsanovelapproach |