Cargando…
Perioperative and long‐term outcomes of Ross versus mechanical aortic valve replacement
BACKGROUND: The ideal aortic valve replacement strategy in young‐ and middle‐aged adults remains up for debate. Clinical practice guidelines recommend mechanical prostheses for most patients less than 50 years of age undergoing aortic valve replacement. However, risks of major hemorrhage and thrombo...
Autores principales: | Wenos, Chelsea D., Herrmann, Jeremy L., Timsina, Lava R., Patel, Parth M., Fehrenbacher, John W., Brown, John W. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9542516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35989510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocs.16831 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Ross operation after removal of a transcatheter aortic valve replacement in pediatric patients
por: Eckhauser, Aaron W., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Ross Procedure Versus Mechanical Versus Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement: A Network Meta‐Analysis
por: Yokoyama, Yujiro, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of the Ross procedure versus conventional aortic valve replacement in young adults
por: Thom, Howard, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Secondary Ross procedure after failed transcatheter aortic valve replacement
por: Fukuhara, Shinichi
Publicado: (2022) -
Correction: Clinical and cost-effectiveness of the Ross procedure versus conventional aortic valve replacement in young adults
Publicado: (2019)