Cargando…
WHO Classification of Tumours fifth edition: evolving issues in the classification, diagnosis, and prognostication of prostate cancer
The fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary and Male Genital Systems encompasses several updates to the classification and diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma as well as incorporating advancements in the assessment of its prognosis, including recent grading modifications. Some...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9542779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35758185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/his.14711 |
_version_ | 1784804226908553216 |
---|---|
author | Kench, James G Amin, Mahul B Berney, Daniel M Compérat, Eva M Cree, Ian A Gill, Anthony J Hartmann, Arndt Menon, Santosh Moch, Holger Netto, George J Raspollini, Maria R Rubin, Mark A Tan, Puay Hoon Tsuzuki, Toyonori Turjalic, Samra van der Kwast, Theo H Zhou, Ming Srigley, John R |
author_facet | Kench, James G Amin, Mahul B Berney, Daniel M Compérat, Eva M Cree, Ian A Gill, Anthony J Hartmann, Arndt Menon, Santosh Moch, Holger Netto, George J Raspollini, Maria R Rubin, Mark A Tan, Puay Hoon Tsuzuki, Toyonori Turjalic, Samra van der Kwast, Theo H Zhou, Ming Srigley, John R |
author_sort | Kench, James G |
collection | PubMed |
description | The fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary and Male Genital Systems encompasses several updates to the classification and diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma as well as incorporating advancements in the assessment of its prognosis, including recent grading modifications. Some of the salient aspects include: (1) recognition that prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN)‐like carcinoma is not synonymous with a pattern of ductal carcinoma, but better classified as a subtype of acinar adenocarcinoma; (2) a specific section on treatment‐related neuroendocrine prostatic carcinoma in view of the tight correlation between androgen deprivation therapy and the development of prostatic carcinoma with neuroendocrine morphology, and the emerging data on lineage plasticity; (3) a terminology change of basal cell carcinoma to “adenoid cystic (basal cell) cell carcinoma” given the presence of an underlying MYB::NFIB gene fusion in many cases; (4) discussion of the current issues in the grading of acinar adenocarcinoma and the prognostic significance of cribriform growth patterns; and (5) more detailed coverage of intraductal carcinoma of prostate (IDC‐P) reflecting our increased knowledge of this entity, while recommending the descriptive term atypical intraductal proliferation (AIP) for lesions falling short of IDC‐P but containing more atypia than typically seen in high‐grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN). Lesions previously regarded as cribriform patterns of HGPIN are now included in the AIP category. This review discusses these developments, summarising the existing literature, as well as the emerging morphological and molecular data that underpins the classification and prognostication of prostatic carcinoma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9542779 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95427792022-10-14 WHO Classification of Tumours fifth edition: evolving issues in the classification, diagnosis, and prognostication of prostate cancer Kench, James G Amin, Mahul B Berney, Daniel M Compérat, Eva M Cree, Ian A Gill, Anthony J Hartmann, Arndt Menon, Santosh Moch, Holger Netto, George J Raspollini, Maria R Rubin, Mark A Tan, Puay Hoon Tsuzuki, Toyonori Turjalic, Samra van der Kwast, Theo H Zhou, Ming Srigley, John R Histopathology Reviews The fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary and Male Genital Systems encompasses several updates to the classification and diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma as well as incorporating advancements in the assessment of its prognosis, including recent grading modifications. Some of the salient aspects include: (1) recognition that prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN)‐like carcinoma is not synonymous with a pattern of ductal carcinoma, but better classified as a subtype of acinar adenocarcinoma; (2) a specific section on treatment‐related neuroendocrine prostatic carcinoma in view of the tight correlation between androgen deprivation therapy and the development of prostatic carcinoma with neuroendocrine morphology, and the emerging data on lineage plasticity; (3) a terminology change of basal cell carcinoma to “adenoid cystic (basal cell) cell carcinoma” given the presence of an underlying MYB::NFIB gene fusion in many cases; (4) discussion of the current issues in the grading of acinar adenocarcinoma and the prognostic significance of cribriform growth patterns; and (5) more detailed coverage of intraductal carcinoma of prostate (IDC‐P) reflecting our increased knowledge of this entity, while recommending the descriptive term atypical intraductal proliferation (AIP) for lesions falling short of IDC‐P but containing more atypia than typically seen in high‐grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN). Lesions previously regarded as cribriform patterns of HGPIN are now included in the AIP category. This review discusses these developments, summarising the existing literature, as well as the emerging morphological and molecular data that underpins the classification and prognostication of prostatic carcinoma. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-02 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9542779/ /pubmed/35758185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/his.14711 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Histopathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Kench, James G Amin, Mahul B Berney, Daniel M Compérat, Eva M Cree, Ian A Gill, Anthony J Hartmann, Arndt Menon, Santosh Moch, Holger Netto, George J Raspollini, Maria R Rubin, Mark A Tan, Puay Hoon Tsuzuki, Toyonori Turjalic, Samra van der Kwast, Theo H Zhou, Ming Srigley, John R WHO Classification of Tumours fifth edition: evolving issues in the classification, diagnosis, and prognostication of prostate cancer |
title |
WHO Classification of Tumours fifth edition: evolving issues in the classification, diagnosis, and prognostication of prostate cancer |
title_full |
WHO Classification of Tumours fifth edition: evolving issues in the classification, diagnosis, and prognostication of prostate cancer |
title_fullStr |
WHO Classification of Tumours fifth edition: evolving issues in the classification, diagnosis, and prognostication of prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed |
WHO Classification of Tumours fifth edition: evolving issues in the classification, diagnosis, and prognostication of prostate cancer |
title_short |
WHO Classification of Tumours fifth edition: evolving issues in the classification, diagnosis, and prognostication of prostate cancer |
title_sort | who classification of tumours fifth edition: evolving issues in the classification, diagnosis, and prognostication of prostate cancer |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9542779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35758185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/his.14711 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kenchjamesg whoclassificationoftumoursfiftheditionevolvingissuesintheclassificationdiagnosisandprognosticationofprostatecancer AT aminmahulb whoclassificationoftumoursfiftheditionevolvingissuesintheclassificationdiagnosisandprognosticationofprostatecancer AT berneydanielm whoclassificationoftumoursfiftheditionevolvingissuesintheclassificationdiagnosisandprognosticationofprostatecancer AT comperatevam whoclassificationoftumoursfiftheditionevolvingissuesintheclassificationdiagnosisandprognosticationofprostatecancer AT creeiana whoclassificationoftumoursfiftheditionevolvingissuesintheclassificationdiagnosisandprognosticationofprostatecancer AT gillanthonyj whoclassificationoftumoursfiftheditionevolvingissuesintheclassificationdiagnosisandprognosticationofprostatecancer AT hartmannarndt whoclassificationoftumoursfiftheditionevolvingissuesintheclassificationdiagnosisandprognosticationofprostatecancer AT menonsantosh whoclassificationoftumoursfiftheditionevolvingissuesintheclassificationdiagnosisandprognosticationofprostatecancer AT mochholger whoclassificationoftumoursfiftheditionevolvingissuesintheclassificationdiagnosisandprognosticationofprostatecancer AT nettogeorgej whoclassificationoftumoursfiftheditionevolvingissuesintheclassificationdiagnosisandprognosticationofprostatecancer AT raspollinimariar whoclassificationoftumoursfiftheditionevolvingissuesintheclassificationdiagnosisandprognosticationofprostatecancer AT rubinmarka whoclassificationoftumoursfiftheditionevolvingissuesintheclassificationdiagnosisandprognosticationofprostatecancer AT tanpuayhoon whoclassificationoftumoursfiftheditionevolvingissuesintheclassificationdiagnosisandprognosticationofprostatecancer AT tsuzukitoyonori whoclassificationoftumoursfiftheditionevolvingissuesintheclassificationdiagnosisandprognosticationofprostatecancer AT turjalicsamra whoclassificationoftumoursfiftheditionevolvingissuesintheclassificationdiagnosisandprognosticationofprostatecancer AT vanderkwasttheoh whoclassificationoftumoursfiftheditionevolvingissuesintheclassificationdiagnosisandprognosticationofprostatecancer AT zhouming whoclassificationoftumoursfiftheditionevolvingissuesintheclassificationdiagnosisandprognosticationofprostatecancer AT srigleyjohnr whoclassificationoftumoursfiftheditionevolvingissuesintheclassificationdiagnosisandprognosticationofprostatecancer |