Cargando…

Emergency department childhood anaphylaxis presentations in regional/remote Australia

AIM: Explore the prevalence of childhood anaphylaxis and clinical presentation of anaphylaxis in children across two regional emergency departments over a 7‐year period. METHODS: Retrospective audit of all children (0–18 years) presenting to emergency from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2016 with ana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weber, Heinrich C, Bassett, Gaylene L, Hollingsworth, Laura K, Gan, Vincent WS, Rose, Samantha, Lim, Jacqueline, Prior, Sarah J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9542789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35506702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpc.16006
_version_ 1784804229501681664
author Weber, Heinrich C
Bassett, Gaylene L
Hollingsworth, Laura K
Gan, Vincent WS
Rose, Samantha
Lim, Jacqueline
Prior, Sarah J
author_facet Weber, Heinrich C
Bassett, Gaylene L
Hollingsworth, Laura K
Gan, Vincent WS
Rose, Samantha
Lim, Jacqueline
Prior, Sarah J
author_sort Weber, Heinrich C
collection PubMed
description AIM: Explore the prevalence of childhood anaphylaxis and clinical presentation of anaphylaxis in children across two regional emergency departments over a 7‐year period. METHODS: Retrospective audit of all children (0–18 years) presenting to emergency from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2016 with anaphylaxis, defined by Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy definitions and doctor diagnosis. RESULTS: Seven hundred and twenty‐four patients were identified with allergic diagnosis, 60% were diagnosed with non‐anaphylaxis allergic reactions or unspecified urticaria and 40% with anaphylaxis (n = 286). Annual prevalence of anaphylaxis remained stable over the study period (M = 30.9/10 000 cases, range: 20.8–48.3/10 000). Gender distribution was equal, median age was 9.48 years (interquartile range = 4–15). Most (71%) arrived by private transport. 23% had a prior history of anaphylaxis. Food triggers (44%) were the most common cause of anaphylaxis. Insect bites/stings triggers occurred in 21%. Patients were promptly assessed (average wait time = 13 min), 16% received prior adrenaline injections. Adrenaline was administered in 26% and 20% were admitted to hospital. On discharge, 29% had a follow‐up plan, 9% received an allergy clinic referral, 6% anaphylaxis action plan, 26% adrenaline autoinjector prescriptions and allergy testing performed in 6%. CONCLUSIONS: We found a relatively low prevalence of overall childhood anaphylaxis in a regional area. The two most common causes of anaphylaxis in this population (food and bites/stings) recorded increased prevalence providing an opportunity for further study. Significant gaps in evidence‐based care of anaphylaxis were noted, demonstrating the need for improved recognition and treatment guideline implementation in regional areas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9542789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95427892022-10-14 Emergency department childhood anaphylaxis presentations in regional/remote Australia Weber, Heinrich C Bassett, Gaylene L Hollingsworth, Laura K Gan, Vincent WS Rose, Samantha Lim, Jacqueline Prior, Sarah J J Paediatr Child Health Original Articles AIM: Explore the prevalence of childhood anaphylaxis and clinical presentation of anaphylaxis in children across two regional emergency departments over a 7‐year period. METHODS: Retrospective audit of all children (0–18 years) presenting to emergency from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2016 with anaphylaxis, defined by Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy definitions and doctor diagnosis. RESULTS: Seven hundred and twenty‐four patients were identified with allergic diagnosis, 60% were diagnosed with non‐anaphylaxis allergic reactions or unspecified urticaria and 40% with anaphylaxis (n = 286). Annual prevalence of anaphylaxis remained stable over the study period (M = 30.9/10 000 cases, range: 20.8–48.3/10 000). Gender distribution was equal, median age was 9.48 years (interquartile range = 4–15). Most (71%) arrived by private transport. 23% had a prior history of anaphylaxis. Food triggers (44%) were the most common cause of anaphylaxis. Insect bites/stings triggers occurred in 21%. Patients were promptly assessed (average wait time = 13 min), 16% received prior adrenaline injections. Adrenaline was administered in 26% and 20% were admitted to hospital. On discharge, 29% had a follow‐up plan, 9% received an allergy clinic referral, 6% anaphylaxis action plan, 26% adrenaline autoinjector prescriptions and allergy testing performed in 6%. CONCLUSIONS: We found a relatively low prevalence of overall childhood anaphylaxis in a regional area. The two most common causes of anaphylaxis in this population (food and bites/stings) recorded increased prevalence providing an opportunity for further study. Significant gaps in evidence‐based care of anaphylaxis were noted, demonstrating the need for improved recognition and treatment guideline implementation in regional areas. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. 2022-05-04 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9542789/ /pubmed/35506702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpc.16006 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Paediatrics and Child Health Division (The Royal Australasian College of Physicians). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Weber, Heinrich C
Bassett, Gaylene L
Hollingsworth, Laura K
Gan, Vincent WS
Rose, Samantha
Lim, Jacqueline
Prior, Sarah J
Emergency department childhood anaphylaxis presentations in regional/remote Australia
title Emergency department childhood anaphylaxis presentations in regional/remote Australia
title_full Emergency department childhood anaphylaxis presentations in regional/remote Australia
title_fullStr Emergency department childhood anaphylaxis presentations in regional/remote Australia
title_full_unstemmed Emergency department childhood anaphylaxis presentations in regional/remote Australia
title_short Emergency department childhood anaphylaxis presentations in regional/remote Australia
title_sort emergency department childhood anaphylaxis presentations in regional/remote australia
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9542789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35506702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpc.16006
work_keys_str_mv AT weberheinrichc emergencydepartmentchildhoodanaphylaxispresentationsinregionalremoteaustralia
AT bassettgaylenel emergencydepartmentchildhoodanaphylaxispresentationsinregionalremoteaustralia
AT hollingsworthlaurak emergencydepartmentchildhoodanaphylaxispresentationsinregionalremoteaustralia
AT ganvincentws emergencydepartmentchildhoodanaphylaxispresentationsinregionalremoteaustralia
AT rosesamantha emergencydepartmentchildhoodanaphylaxispresentationsinregionalremoteaustralia
AT limjacqueline emergencydepartmentchildhoodanaphylaxispresentationsinregionalremoteaustralia
AT priorsarahj emergencydepartmentchildhoodanaphylaxispresentationsinregionalremoteaustralia