Cargando…
Nasal protection strategy reduces the incidence of nasal pressure injuries during nasotracheal intubation: Meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis
Nasal pressure injury is a serious problem during nasotracheal intubation. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether use of a nasal protection strategy (a protective dressing or a modified fixation method for the tracheal tube) reduces the incidence of nasal pressure...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9542826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36221363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000030638 |
_version_ | 1784804238504755200 |
---|---|
author | Hoshijima, Hiroshi Mihara, Takahiro Nagumo, Takumi Sato (Boku), Aiji Shiga, Toshiya Mizuta, Kentaro |
author_facet | Hoshijima, Hiroshi Mihara, Takahiro Nagumo, Takumi Sato (Boku), Aiji Shiga, Toshiya Mizuta, Kentaro |
author_sort | Hoshijima, Hiroshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Nasal pressure injury is a serious problem during nasotracheal intubation. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether use of a nasal protection strategy (a protective dressing or a modified fixation method for the tracheal tube) reduces the incidence of nasal pressure injury during nasotracheal intubation. METHODS: Literature searches were performed using three electronic databases. Data from each of the eligible trials were combined, and calculations were made using DerSimonian and Laird random effects models. The pooled effect estimates for nasal pressure injury were evaluated using the relative risk and 95% confidence interval, the Cochrane Q statistic, and the I(2) statistic. We also performed trial sequential analysis (TSA) to assess sensitivity to prevent type I error. We separated patients into subgroups to analyze the incidence of nasal pressure injury according to whether a protective dressing or a modified fixation method for the tracheal tube was used. RESULTS: The literature search yielded five eligible trials. Meta-analysis of these trials showed that a nasal protection strategy significantly reduced the incidence of nasal pressure injury during nasotracheal intubation (relative risk (RR) 0.34; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21–0.56; P < .0001; Cochrane’s Q = 5.86, I(2) = 32%). The TSA boundary for futility could not be calculated because of an insufficient sample size. In subgroup analysis, both methods significantly reduced the incidence of nasal pressure injury during nasotracheal intubation. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that a nasal protection strategy significantly reduces the incidence of nasal pressure injury during nasotracheal intubation. During nasotracheal intubation, the use of a protective dressing or modified fixation method for the tracheal tube can prevent to the incidence of nasal pressure injuries. However, the number of samples in our meta-analysis was too small for TSA and further studies are required. TRIALS REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; registration number 252091). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9542826 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95428262022-10-11 Nasal protection strategy reduces the incidence of nasal pressure injuries during nasotracheal intubation: Meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis Hoshijima, Hiroshi Mihara, Takahiro Nagumo, Takumi Sato (Boku), Aiji Shiga, Toshiya Mizuta, Kentaro Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article Nasal pressure injury is a serious problem during nasotracheal intubation. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether use of a nasal protection strategy (a protective dressing or a modified fixation method for the tracheal tube) reduces the incidence of nasal pressure injury during nasotracheal intubation. METHODS: Literature searches were performed using three electronic databases. Data from each of the eligible trials were combined, and calculations were made using DerSimonian and Laird random effects models. The pooled effect estimates for nasal pressure injury were evaluated using the relative risk and 95% confidence interval, the Cochrane Q statistic, and the I(2) statistic. We also performed trial sequential analysis (TSA) to assess sensitivity to prevent type I error. We separated patients into subgroups to analyze the incidence of nasal pressure injury according to whether a protective dressing or a modified fixation method for the tracheal tube was used. RESULTS: The literature search yielded five eligible trials. Meta-analysis of these trials showed that a nasal protection strategy significantly reduced the incidence of nasal pressure injury during nasotracheal intubation (relative risk (RR) 0.34; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21–0.56; P < .0001; Cochrane’s Q = 5.86, I(2) = 32%). The TSA boundary for futility could not be calculated because of an insufficient sample size. In subgroup analysis, both methods significantly reduced the incidence of nasal pressure injury during nasotracheal intubation. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that a nasal protection strategy significantly reduces the incidence of nasal pressure injury during nasotracheal intubation. During nasotracheal intubation, the use of a protective dressing or modified fixation method for the tracheal tube can prevent to the incidence of nasal pressure injuries. However, the number of samples in our meta-analysis was too small for TSA and further studies are required. TRIALS REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; registration number 252091). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9542826/ /pubmed/36221363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000030638 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hoshijima, Hiroshi Mihara, Takahiro Nagumo, Takumi Sato (Boku), Aiji Shiga, Toshiya Mizuta, Kentaro Nasal protection strategy reduces the incidence of nasal pressure injuries during nasotracheal intubation: Meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis |
title | Nasal protection strategy reduces the incidence of nasal pressure injuries during nasotracheal intubation: Meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis |
title_full | Nasal protection strategy reduces the incidence of nasal pressure injuries during nasotracheal intubation: Meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis |
title_fullStr | Nasal protection strategy reduces the incidence of nasal pressure injuries during nasotracheal intubation: Meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Nasal protection strategy reduces the incidence of nasal pressure injuries during nasotracheal intubation: Meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis |
title_short | Nasal protection strategy reduces the incidence of nasal pressure injuries during nasotracheal intubation: Meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis |
title_sort | nasal protection strategy reduces the incidence of nasal pressure injuries during nasotracheal intubation: meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9542826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36221363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000030638 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoshijimahiroshi nasalprotectionstrategyreducestheincidenceofnasalpressureinjuriesduringnasotrachealintubationmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT miharatakahiro nasalprotectionstrategyreducestheincidenceofnasalpressureinjuriesduringnasotrachealintubationmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT nagumotakumi nasalprotectionstrategyreducestheincidenceofnasalpressureinjuriesduringnasotrachealintubationmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT satobokuaiji nasalprotectionstrategyreducestheincidenceofnasalpressureinjuriesduringnasotrachealintubationmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT shigatoshiya nasalprotectionstrategyreducestheincidenceofnasalpressureinjuriesduringnasotrachealintubationmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT mizutakentaro nasalprotectionstrategyreducestheincidenceofnasalpressureinjuriesduringnasotrachealintubationmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis |