Cargando…

Effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on memory disorder in stroke: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Approximately 23% to 55% of patients have memory impairments with a greatly negative effect on daily life 3 months after stroke. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been widely used in the rehabilitation of stroke as it is safe, painless, and noninvasive. Moreover, few studies ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Haihua, Xiong, Dan, Zhu, Pan, Li, Hao, Zhang, Hong, Tan, Jie, Zhao, Ning
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9542838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36221389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000030933
_version_ 1784804241214275584
author Xie, Haihua
Xiong, Dan
Zhu, Pan
Li, Hao
Zhang, Hong
Tan, Jie
Zhao, Ning
author_facet Xie, Haihua
Xiong, Dan
Zhu, Pan
Li, Hao
Zhang, Hong
Tan, Jie
Zhao, Ning
author_sort Xie, Haihua
collection PubMed
description Approximately 23% to 55% of patients have memory impairments with a greatly negative effect on daily life 3 months after stroke. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been widely used in the rehabilitation of stroke as it is safe, painless, and noninvasive. Moreover, few studies have investigated the effect of rTMS on poststroke memory disorder (PSMD). However, the efficacy of rTMS is not consistent and the optional stimulation frequency is unclear. Therefore, this protocol aims to evaluate the clinical effect and safety of rTMS on PSMD by analyzing results from randomized controlled trials. METHODS: Search strategies will be performed on seven databases: PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang, and Technology Periodical Database (VIP). Only randomized controlled trials registered before August 2021 will be included. Additionally, the language will be limited to English or Chinese. For the outcome, we will focus on the Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test. Additionally, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Mini-mental State Examination, Modified Barthel Index, and advent events will be included. Two authors will independently select the study, extract data, and assess quality. Moreover, disagreements will be resolved by the third author. STATA 14 and Review Manager 5.4 will be used to perform the analysis. We will evaluate bias risk in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. To assess the quality of evidence, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method will be employed. RESULTS: This study will provide a comprehensive analysis of the current evidence on rTMS for PSMD. CONCLUSION: A reliable conclusion regarding whether rTMS is an effective and safe intervention for patients with PSMD and the effect of stimulation frequency and sham stimulation will be provided. This study will provide new insights for TMS in treating PSMD, and offer appropriate treatmentoptions to patients and clinicians. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021282439.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9542838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95428382022-10-11 Effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on memory disorder in stroke: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis Xie, Haihua Xiong, Dan Zhu, Pan Li, Hao Zhang, Hong Tan, Jie Zhao, Ning Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article Approximately 23% to 55% of patients have memory impairments with a greatly negative effect on daily life 3 months after stroke. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been widely used in the rehabilitation of stroke as it is safe, painless, and noninvasive. Moreover, few studies have investigated the effect of rTMS on poststroke memory disorder (PSMD). However, the efficacy of rTMS is not consistent and the optional stimulation frequency is unclear. Therefore, this protocol aims to evaluate the clinical effect and safety of rTMS on PSMD by analyzing results from randomized controlled trials. METHODS: Search strategies will be performed on seven databases: PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang, and Technology Periodical Database (VIP). Only randomized controlled trials registered before August 2021 will be included. Additionally, the language will be limited to English or Chinese. For the outcome, we will focus on the Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test. Additionally, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Mini-mental State Examination, Modified Barthel Index, and advent events will be included. Two authors will independently select the study, extract data, and assess quality. Moreover, disagreements will be resolved by the third author. STATA 14 and Review Manager 5.4 will be used to perform the analysis. We will evaluate bias risk in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. To assess the quality of evidence, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method will be employed. RESULTS: This study will provide a comprehensive analysis of the current evidence on rTMS for PSMD. CONCLUSION: A reliable conclusion regarding whether rTMS is an effective and safe intervention for patients with PSMD and the effect of stimulation frequency and sham stimulation will be provided. This study will provide new insights for TMS in treating PSMD, and offer appropriate treatmentoptions to patients and clinicians. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021282439. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9542838/ /pubmed/36221389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000030933 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xie, Haihua
Xiong, Dan
Zhu, Pan
Li, Hao
Zhang, Hong
Tan, Jie
Zhao, Ning
Effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on memory disorder in stroke: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title Effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on memory disorder in stroke: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on memory disorder in stroke: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on memory disorder in stroke: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on memory disorder in stroke: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on memory disorder in stroke: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on memory disorder in stroke: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9542838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36221389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000030933
work_keys_str_mv AT xiehaihua effectivenessandsafetyofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationonmemorydisorderinstrokeaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiongdan effectivenessandsafetyofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationonmemorydisorderinstrokeaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhupan effectivenessandsafetyofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationonmemorydisorderinstrokeaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lihao effectivenessandsafetyofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationonmemorydisorderinstrokeaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhanghong effectivenessandsafetyofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationonmemorydisorderinstrokeaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tanjie effectivenessandsafetyofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationonmemorydisorderinstrokeaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaoning effectivenessandsafetyofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationonmemorydisorderinstrokeaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis