Cargando…

Quantitative Comparison of Dosimetric Data Between the Indigenous Baseplate and Commercially Available Carbon Fiber Baseplate for 6 and 15 MV Photon Energy

BACKGROUND: This study aims to design an indigenous baseplate (ID baseplate) that is economically viable and dosimetrically comparable for radiotherapy patient treatment. An ID baseplate was designed and manufactured using wood plastic composition materials that are readily available in the market a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gayake, Umesh Bharat, Tike, Pramod, Bangare, Mamata, Raveendran, Vysakh, Phurailatpam, Reena, George, Karishma, Musne, Vishnu, Dhore, Arun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9542997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36212209
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_90_21
_version_ 1784804273588011008
author Gayake, Umesh Bharat
Tike, Pramod
Bangare, Mamata
Raveendran, Vysakh
Phurailatpam, Reena
George, Karishma
Musne, Vishnu
Dhore, Arun
author_facet Gayake, Umesh Bharat
Tike, Pramod
Bangare, Mamata
Raveendran, Vysakh
Phurailatpam, Reena
George, Karishma
Musne, Vishnu
Dhore, Arun
author_sort Gayake, Umesh Bharat
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aims to design an indigenous baseplate (ID baseplate) that is economically viable and dosimetrically comparable for radiotherapy patient treatment. An ID baseplate was designed and manufactured using wood plastic composition materials that are readily available in the market and were compared dosimetrically with the commercially available carbon fiber baseplate (CF baseplate). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surface dose and beam attenuation properties of both the baseplates (ID and CF) were measured using a parallel plate chamber and compared with the dose calculated from the treatment planning system (TPS). Separate computer tomography images of both the baseplates were acquired by placing solid water phantoms. These images were used for surface dose calculation in the TPS and were validated with experimental measurements. Proper densities were assigned to the couch and baseplates to avoid uncertainties in dose calculations. All measurements were performed at field sizes 10 cm × 10 cm for 6 MV and 15 MV photon beams. RESULTS: The percentage surface dose measured for the ID baseplate and CF baseplate was found to be matching for 6 MV beam (98.2% and 97%, respectively); however, for the 15 MV beam, the ID baseplate showed a higher surface dose of 98.6% compared to CF baseplate (87.4%). For the ID baseplate, the percentage difference in the surface dose between that TPS calculated value and the measured values were 1.6% and 1.4% for 6MV and 15MV, respectively. The ID baseplate showed higher beam attenuation than the CF baseplate by 2.2% for the 6MV beam and 3.4% for the 15MV beam when proper electron densities were not assigned. The difference between the TPS calculated dose and delivered dose was achieved within 3% after assigning proper electron density to the couch and baseplate. CONCLUSIONS: The ID baseplate has shown acceptable dosimetric results and can be an economically viable alternative to the commercially available CF baseplates. The manufacturing cost of the ID baseplate was ten times cheaper than the CF baseplate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9542997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95429972022-10-08 Quantitative Comparison of Dosimetric Data Between the Indigenous Baseplate and Commercially Available Carbon Fiber Baseplate for 6 and 15 MV Photon Energy Gayake, Umesh Bharat Tike, Pramod Bangare, Mamata Raveendran, Vysakh Phurailatpam, Reena George, Karishma Musne, Vishnu Dhore, Arun J Med Phys Original Article BACKGROUND: This study aims to design an indigenous baseplate (ID baseplate) that is economically viable and dosimetrically comparable for radiotherapy patient treatment. An ID baseplate was designed and manufactured using wood plastic composition materials that are readily available in the market and were compared dosimetrically with the commercially available carbon fiber baseplate (CF baseplate). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surface dose and beam attenuation properties of both the baseplates (ID and CF) were measured using a parallel plate chamber and compared with the dose calculated from the treatment planning system (TPS). Separate computer tomography images of both the baseplates were acquired by placing solid water phantoms. These images were used for surface dose calculation in the TPS and were validated with experimental measurements. Proper densities were assigned to the couch and baseplates to avoid uncertainties in dose calculations. All measurements were performed at field sizes 10 cm × 10 cm for 6 MV and 15 MV photon beams. RESULTS: The percentage surface dose measured for the ID baseplate and CF baseplate was found to be matching for 6 MV beam (98.2% and 97%, respectively); however, for the 15 MV beam, the ID baseplate showed a higher surface dose of 98.6% compared to CF baseplate (87.4%). For the ID baseplate, the percentage difference in the surface dose between that TPS calculated value and the measured values were 1.6% and 1.4% for 6MV and 15MV, respectively. The ID baseplate showed higher beam attenuation than the CF baseplate by 2.2% for the 6MV beam and 3.4% for the 15MV beam when proper electron densities were not assigned. The difference between the TPS calculated dose and delivered dose was achieved within 3% after assigning proper electron density to the couch and baseplate. CONCLUSIONS: The ID baseplate has shown acceptable dosimetric results and can be an economically viable alternative to the commercially available CF baseplates. The manufacturing cost of the ID baseplate was ten times cheaper than the CF baseplate. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9542997/ /pubmed/36212209 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_90_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Medical Physics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gayake, Umesh Bharat
Tike, Pramod
Bangare, Mamata
Raveendran, Vysakh
Phurailatpam, Reena
George, Karishma
Musne, Vishnu
Dhore, Arun
Quantitative Comparison of Dosimetric Data Between the Indigenous Baseplate and Commercially Available Carbon Fiber Baseplate for 6 and 15 MV Photon Energy
title Quantitative Comparison of Dosimetric Data Between the Indigenous Baseplate and Commercially Available Carbon Fiber Baseplate for 6 and 15 MV Photon Energy
title_full Quantitative Comparison of Dosimetric Data Between the Indigenous Baseplate and Commercially Available Carbon Fiber Baseplate for 6 and 15 MV Photon Energy
title_fullStr Quantitative Comparison of Dosimetric Data Between the Indigenous Baseplate and Commercially Available Carbon Fiber Baseplate for 6 and 15 MV Photon Energy
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Comparison of Dosimetric Data Between the Indigenous Baseplate and Commercially Available Carbon Fiber Baseplate for 6 and 15 MV Photon Energy
title_short Quantitative Comparison of Dosimetric Data Between the Indigenous Baseplate and Commercially Available Carbon Fiber Baseplate for 6 and 15 MV Photon Energy
title_sort quantitative comparison of dosimetric data between the indigenous baseplate and commercially available carbon fiber baseplate for 6 and 15 mv photon energy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9542997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36212209
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_90_21
work_keys_str_mv AT gayakeumeshbharat quantitativecomparisonofdosimetricdatabetweentheindigenousbaseplateandcommerciallyavailablecarbonfiberbaseplatefor6and15mvphotonenergy
AT tikepramod quantitativecomparisonofdosimetricdatabetweentheindigenousbaseplateandcommerciallyavailablecarbonfiberbaseplatefor6and15mvphotonenergy
AT bangaremamata quantitativecomparisonofdosimetricdatabetweentheindigenousbaseplateandcommerciallyavailablecarbonfiberbaseplatefor6and15mvphotonenergy
AT raveendranvysakh quantitativecomparisonofdosimetricdatabetweentheindigenousbaseplateandcommerciallyavailablecarbonfiberbaseplatefor6and15mvphotonenergy
AT phurailatpamreena quantitativecomparisonofdosimetricdatabetweentheindigenousbaseplateandcommerciallyavailablecarbonfiberbaseplatefor6and15mvphotonenergy
AT georgekarishma quantitativecomparisonofdosimetricdatabetweentheindigenousbaseplateandcommerciallyavailablecarbonfiberbaseplatefor6and15mvphotonenergy
AT musnevishnu quantitativecomparisonofdosimetricdatabetweentheindigenousbaseplateandcommerciallyavailablecarbonfiberbaseplatefor6and15mvphotonenergy
AT dhorearun quantitativecomparisonofdosimetricdatabetweentheindigenousbaseplateandcommerciallyavailablecarbonfiberbaseplatefor6and15mvphotonenergy