Cargando…

Accuracy of a new electronic nose for prostate cancer diagnosis in urine samples

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of a new electronic nose to recognize prostate cancer in urine samples. METHODS: A blind, prospective study on consecutive patients was designed. Overall, 174 subjects were included in the study: 88 (50.6%) in prostate cancer group, and 86 (49.4%) in control group...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taverna, Gianluigi, Grizzi, Fabio, Tidu, Lorenzo, Bax, Carmen, Zanoni, Matteo, Vota, Paolo, Lotesoriere, Beatrice Julia, Prudenza, Stefano, Magagnin, Luca, Langfelder, Giacomo, Buffi, Nicolò, Casale, Paolo, Capelli, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9543199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35534435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iju.14912
_version_ 1784804319543951360
author Taverna, Gianluigi
Grizzi, Fabio
Tidu, Lorenzo
Bax, Carmen
Zanoni, Matteo
Vota, Paolo
Lotesoriere, Beatrice Julia
Prudenza, Stefano
Magagnin, Luca
Langfelder, Giacomo
Buffi, Nicolò
Casale, Paolo
Capelli, Laura
author_facet Taverna, Gianluigi
Grizzi, Fabio
Tidu, Lorenzo
Bax, Carmen
Zanoni, Matteo
Vota, Paolo
Lotesoriere, Beatrice Julia
Prudenza, Stefano
Magagnin, Luca
Langfelder, Giacomo
Buffi, Nicolò
Casale, Paolo
Capelli, Laura
author_sort Taverna, Gianluigi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of a new electronic nose to recognize prostate cancer in urine samples. METHODS: A blind, prospective study on consecutive patients was designed. Overall, 174 subjects were included in the study: 88 (50.6%) in prostate cancer group, and 86 (49.4%) in control group. Electronic nose performance for prostate cancer was assessed using sensitivity and specificity. The diagnostic accuracy of electronic nose was reported as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: The electronic nose in the study population reached a sensitivity 85.2% (95% confidence interval 76.1–91.9; 13 false negatives out of 88), a specificity 79.1% (95% confidence interval 69.0–87.1; 18 false positives out of 86). The accuracy of the electronic nose represented as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.821 (95% confidence interval 0.764–0.879). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of electronic nose for recognizing prostate cancer in urine samples is high, promising and susceptible to supplemental improvement. Additionally, further studies will be necessary to design a clinical trial to validate electronic nose application in diagnostic prostate cancer nomograms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9543199
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95431992022-10-14 Accuracy of a new electronic nose for prostate cancer diagnosis in urine samples Taverna, Gianluigi Grizzi, Fabio Tidu, Lorenzo Bax, Carmen Zanoni, Matteo Vota, Paolo Lotesoriere, Beatrice Julia Prudenza, Stefano Magagnin, Luca Langfelder, Giacomo Buffi, Nicolò Casale, Paolo Capelli, Laura Int J Urol Original Articles: Laboratory Investigation OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of a new electronic nose to recognize prostate cancer in urine samples. METHODS: A blind, prospective study on consecutive patients was designed. Overall, 174 subjects were included in the study: 88 (50.6%) in prostate cancer group, and 86 (49.4%) in control group. Electronic nose performance for prostate cancer was assessed using sensitivity and specificity. The diagnostic accuracy of electronic nose was reported as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: The electronic nose in the study population reached a sensitivity 85.2% (95% confidence interval 76.1–91.9; 13 false negatives out of 88), a specificity 79.1% (95% confidence interval 69.0–87.1; 18 false positives out of 86). The accuracy of the electronic nose represented as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.821 (95% confidence interval 0.764–0.879). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of electronic nose for recognizing prostate cancer in urine samples is high, promising and susceptible to supplemental improvement. Additionally, further studies will be necessary to design a clinical trial to validate electronic nose application in diagnostic prostate cancer nomograms. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-09 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9543199/ /pubmed/35534435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iju.14912 Text en © 2022 The Authors. International Journal of Urology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Urological Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles: Laboratory Investigation
Taverna, Gianluigi
Grizzi, Fabio
Tidu, Lorenzo
Bax, Carmen
Zanoni, Matteo
Vota, Paolo
Lotesoriere, Beatrice Julia
Prudenza, Stefano
Magagnin, Luca
Langfelder, Giacomo
Buffi, Nicolò
Casale, Paolo
Capelli, Laura
Accuracy of a new electronic nose for prostate cancer diagnosis in urine samples
title Accuracy of a new electronic nose for prostate cancer diagnosis in urine samples
title_full Accuracy of a new electronic nose for prostate cancer diagnosis in urine samples
title_fullStr Accuracy of a new electronic nose for prostate cancer diagnosis in urine samples
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of a new electronic nose for prostate cancer diagnosis in urine samples
title_short Accuracy of a new electronic nose for prostate cancer diagnosis in urine samples
title_sort accuracy of a new electronic nose for prostate cancer diagnosis in urine samples
topic Original Articles: Laboratory Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9543199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35534435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iju.14912
work_keys_str_mv AT tavernagianluigi accuracyofanewelectronicnoseforprostatecancerdiagnosisinurinesamples
AT grizzifabio accuracyofanewelectronicnoseforprostatecancerdiagnosisinurinesamples
AT tidulorenzo accuracyofanewelectronicnoseforprostatecancerdiagnosisinurinesamples
AT baxcarmen accuracyofanewelectronicnoseforprostatecancerdiagnosisinurinesamples
AT zanonimatteo accuracyofanewelectronicnoseforprostatecancerdiagnosisinurinesamples
AT votapaolo accuracyofanewelectronicnoseforprostatecancerdiagnosisinurinesamples
AT lotesorierebeatricejulia accuracyofanewelectronicnoseforprostatecancerdiagnosisinurinesamples
AT prudenzastefano accuracyofanewelectronicnoseforprostatecancerdiagnosisinurinesamples
AT magagninluca accuracyofanewelectronicnoseforprostatecancerdiagnosisinurinesamples
AT langfeldergiacomo accuracyofanewelectronicnoseforprostatecancerdiagnosisinurinesamples
AT buffinicolo accuracyofanewelectronicnoseforprostatecancerdiagnosisinurinesamples
AT casalepaolo accuracyofanewelectronicnoseforprostatecancerdiagnosisinurinesamples
AT capellilaura accuracyofanewelectronicnoseforprostatecancerdiagnosisinurinesamples