Cargando…

Comparison of three sedation models for same‐day painless bidirectional endoscopy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND AIM: We investigated the most beneficial propofol sedation model for same‐day painless bidirectional endoscopy (BDE). METHODS: Asymptomatic participants scheduled for same‐day painless BDE examination from October 2020 to September 2021 were randomized to three groups: sedated esophag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sui, Yue, Chen, Xing, Ma, Ting, Lu, Junhui, Xiao, Tao, Wang, Zhenzhen, Wen, Qing, Wang, Guanfeng, Jia, Hui, Cao, Fengzhen, Wu, Xiaopeng, Zhang, Yiping, Hao, Junlian, Wang, Naping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9543240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35618650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgh.15901
_version_ 1784804329309339648
author Sui, Yue
Chen, Xing
Ma, Ting
Lu, Junhui
Xiao, Tao
Wang, Zhenzhen
Wen, Qing
Wang, Guanfeng
Jia, Hui
Cao, Fengzhen
Wu, Xiaopeng
Zhang, Yiping
Hao, Junlian
Wang, Naping
author_facet Sui, Yue
Chen, Xing
Ma, Ting
Lu, Junhui
Xiao, Tao
Wang, Zhenzhen
Wen, Qing
Wang, Guanfeng
Jia, Hui
Cao, Fengzhen
Wu, Xiaopeng
Zhang, Yiping
Hao, Junlian
Wang, Naping
author_sort Sui, Yue
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: We investigated the most beneficial propofol sedation model for same‐day painless bidirectional endoscopy (BDE). METHODS: Asymptomatic participants scheduled for same‐day painless BDE examination from October 2020 to September 2021 were randomized to three groups: sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by unsedated colonoscopy (Group A); sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by sedated colonoscopy (Group B); and sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by sedated insertion colonoscopy (Group C). Patient discomfort, colonoscopy performance, doses of propofol, cardiovascular stress, anesthesia resuscitation, and sedation‐related adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 3200 participants were analyzed. Baseline demographics, patient discomfort, cecal intubation rate, adenoma detection rate and sedation‐related adverse events were similar in the three groups. Propofol dose was the lowest in Group A (137.65 ± 36.865 mg) compared with Group B (177.71 ± 40.112 mg, P < 0.05) and Group C (161.63 ± 31.789 mg, P < 0.05). Decline in vital signs was most obvious in Group B during the procedure (P < 0.05). Recovery time was the shortest in Group A (5.01 ± 1.404 min) compared with Group B (9.51 ± 2.870 min, P < 0.05) and Group C (5.83 ± 2.594 min, P < 0.05); discharge time was the shortest in Group A (3.53 ± 1.685 min) compared with Group B (11.29 ± 5.172 min, P < 0.05) and Group C (6.47 ± 2.338 min, P < 0.05). Adenomas per positive patient of Group A (2.29 ± 1.055) and Group C (2.28 ± 0.931) were more than that in Group B (2.11 ± 0.946, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by unsedated colonoscopy is the superior model for same‐day painless BDE with the benefits of satisfactory patient comfort, reduced sedation dose, less cardiovascular stress, faster recovery, shorter discharge time and high colonoscopy quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9543240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95432402022-10-14 Comparison of three sedation models for same‐day painless bidirectional endoscopy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial Sui, Yue Chen, Xing Ma, Ting Lu, Junhui Xiao, Tao Wang, Zhenzhen Wen, Qing Wang, Guanfeng Jia, Hui Cao, Fengzhen Wu, Xiaopeng Zhang, Yiping Hao, Junlian Wang, Naping J Gastroenterol Hepatol Regular Articles BACKGROUND AND AIM: We investigated the most beneficial propofol sedation model for same‐day painless bidirectional endoscopy (BDE). METHODS: Asymptomatic participants scheduled for same‐day painless BDE examination from October 2020 to September 2021 were randomized to three groups: sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by unsedated colonoscopy (Group A); sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by sedated colonoscopy (Group B); and sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by sedated insertion colonoscopy (Group C). Patient discomfort, colonoscopy performance, doses of propofol, cardiovascular stress, anesthesia resuscitation, and sedation‐related adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 3200 participants were analyzed. Baseline demographics, patient discomfort, cecal intubation rate, adenoma detection rate and sedation‐related adverse events were similar in the three groups. Propofol dose was the lowest in Group A (137.65 ± 36.865 mg) compared with Group B (177.71 ± 40.112 mg, P < 0.05) and Group C (161.63 ± 31.789 mg, P < 0.05). Decline in vital signs was most obvious in Group B during the procedure (P < 0.05). Recovery time was the shortest in Group A (5.01 ± 1.404 min) compared with Group B (9.51 ± 2.870 min, P < 0.05) and Group C (5.83 ± 2.594 min, P < 0.05); discharge time was the shortest in Group A (3.53 ± 1.685 min) compared with Group B (11.29 ± 5.172 min, P < 0.05) and Group C (6.47 ± 2.338 min, P < 0.05). Adenomas per positive patient of Group A (2.29 ± 1.055) and Group C (2.28 ± 0.931) were more than that in Group B (2.11 ± 0.946, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by unsedated colonoscopy is the superior model for same‐day painless BDE with the benefits of satisfactory patient comfort, reduced sedation dose, less cardiovascular stress, faster recovery, shorter discharge time and high colonoscopy quality. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-02 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9543240/ /pubmed/35618650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgh.15901 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Regular Articles
Sui, Yue
Chen, Xing
Ma, Ting
Lu, Junhui
Xiao, Tao
Wang, Zhenzhen
Wen, Qing
Wang, Guanfeng
Jia, Hui
Cao, Fengzhen
Wu, Xiaopeng
Zhang, Yiping
Hao, Junlian
Wang, Naping
Comparison of three sedation models for same‐day painless bidirectional endoscopy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial
title Comparison of three sedation models for same‐day painless bidirectional endoscopy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of three sedation models for same‐day painless bidirectional endoscopy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of three sedation models for same‐day painless bidirectional endoscopy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three sedation models for same‐day painless bidirectional endoscopy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of three sedation models for same‐day painless bidirectional endoscopy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of three sedation models for same‐day painless bidirectional endoscopy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
topic Regular Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9543240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35618650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgh.15901
work_keys_str_mv AT suiyue comparisonofthreesedationmodelsforsamedaypainlessbidirectionalendoscopyamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chenxing comparisonofthreesedationmodelsforsamedaypainlessbidirectionalendoscopyamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mating comparisonofthreesedationmodelsforsamedaypainlessbidirectionalendoscopyamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lujunhui comparisonofthreesedationmodelsforsamedaypainlessbidirectionalendoscopyamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT xiaotao comparisonofthreesedationmodelsforsamedaypainlessbidirectionalendoscopyamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wangzhenzhen comparisonofthreesedationmodelsforsamedaypainlessbidirectionalendoscopyamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wenqing comparisonofthreesedationmodelsforsamedaypainlessbidirectionalendoscopyamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wangguanfeng comparisonofthreesedationmodelsforsamedaypainlessbidirectionalendoscopyamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jiahui comparisonofthreesedationmodelsforsamedaypainlessbidirectionalendoscopyamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT caofengzhen comparisonofthreesedationmodelsforsamedaypainlessbidirectionalendoscopyamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wuxiaopeng comparisonofthreesedationmodelsforsamedaypainlessbidirectionalendoscopyamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhangyiping comparisonofthreesedationmodelsforsamedaypainlessbidirectionalendoscopyamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT haojunlian comparisonofthreesedationmodelsforsamedaypainlessbidirectionalendoscopyamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wangnaping comparisonofthreesedationmodelsforsamedaypainlessbidirectionalendoscopyamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial