Cargando…

The Work‐Averse Cyberattacker Model: Theory and Evidence from Two Million Attack Signatures

The assumption that a cyberattacker will potentially exploit all present vulnerabilities drives most modern cyber risk management practices and the corresponding security investments. We propose a new attacker model, based on dynamic optimization, where we demonstrate that large, initial, fixed cost...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allodi, Luca, Massacci, Fabio, Williams, Julian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9543271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33960506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/risa.13732
_version_ 1784804336456433664
author Allodi, Luca
Massacci, Fabio
Williams, Julian
author_facet Allodi, Luca
Massacci, Fabio
Williams, Julian
author_sort Allodi, Luca
collection PubMed
description The assumption that a cyberattacker will potentially exploit all present vulnerabilities drives most modern cyber risk management practices and the corresponding security investments. We propose a new attacker model, based on dynamic optimization, where we demonstrate that large, initial, fixed costs of exploit development induce attackers to delay implementation and deployment of exploits of vulnerabilities. The theoretical model predicts that mass attackers will preferably (i) exploit only one vulnerability per software version, (ii) largely include only vulnerabilities requiring low attack complexity, and (iii) be slow at trying to weaponize new vulnerabilities . These predictions are empirically validated on a large data set of observed massed attacks launched against a large collection of information systems. Findings in this article allow cyber risk managers to better concentrate their efforts for vulnerability management, and set a new theoretical and empirical basis for further research defining attacker (offensive) processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9543271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95432712022-10-14 The Work‐Averse Cyberattacker Model: Theory and Evidence from Two Million Attack Signatures Allodi, Luca Massacci, Fabio Williams, Julian Risk Anal Original Research Articles The assumption that a cyberattacker will potentially exploit all present vulnerabilities drives most modern cyber risk management practices and the corresponding security investments. We propose a new attacker model, based on dynamic optimization, where we demonstrate that large, initial, fixed costs of exploit development induce attackers to delay implementation and deployment of exploits of vulnerabilities. The theoretical model predicts that mass attackers will preferably (i) exploit only one vulnerability per software version, (ii) largely include only vulnerabilities requiring low attack complexity, and (iii) be slow at trying to weaponize new vulnerabilities . These predictions are empirically validated on a large data set of observed massed attacks launched against a large collection of information systems. Findings in this article allow cyber risk managers to better concentrate their efforts for vulnerability management, and set a new theoretical and empirical basis for further research defining attacker (offensive) processes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-07 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9543271/ /pubmed/33960506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/risa.13732 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Risk Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Risk Analysis. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Allodi, Luca
Massacci, Fabio
Williams, Julian
The Work‐Averse Cyberattacker Model: Theory and Evidence from Two Million Attack Signatures
title The Work‐Averse Cyberattacker Model: Theory and Evidence from Two Million Attack Signatures
title_full The Work‐Averse Cyberattacker Model: Theory and Evidence from Two Million Attack Signatures
title_fullStr The Work‐Averse Cyberattacker Model: Theory and Evidence from Two Million Attack Signatures
title_full_unstemmed The Work‐Averse Cyberattacker Model: Theory and Evidence from Two Million Attack Signatures
title_short The Work‐Averse Cyberattacker Model: Theory and Evidence from Two Million Attack Signatures
title_sort work‐averse cyberattacker model: theory and evidence from two million attack signatures
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9543271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33960506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/risa.13732
work_keys_str_mv AT allodiluca theworkaversecyberattackermodeltheoryandevidencefromtwomillionattacksignatures
AT massaccifabio theworkaversecyberattackermodeltheoryandevidencefromtwomillionattacksignatures
AT williamsjulian theworkaversecyberattackermodeltheoryandevidencefromtwomillionattacksignatures
AT allodiluca workaversecyberattackermodeltheoryandevidencefromtwomillionattacksignatures
AT massaccifabio workaversecyberattackermodeltheoryandevidencefromtwomillionattacksignatures
AT williamsjulian workaversecyberattackermodeltheoryandevidencefromtwomillionattacksignatures