Cargando…

Efficacy and safety outcomes of dulaglutide by baseline HbA1c: A post hoc analysis of the REWIND trial

AIM: To assess cardiovascular, glycaemic, weight and safety outcomes of long‐term treatment with dulaglutide 1.5 mg compared with placebo in patients with a baseline HbA1c of less than 7% versus 7% or higher. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intention‐to‐treat analyses were performed on REWIND participants wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Franek, Edward, Gerstein, Hertzel C., Riddle, Matthew C., Nicolay, Claudia, Hickey, Ana, Botros, Fady T., Loo, Li Shen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9543284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35546279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.14760
_version_ 1784804339860111360
author Franek, Edward
Gerstein, Hertzel C.
Riddle, Matthew C.
Nicolay, Claudia
Hickey, Ana
Botros, Fady T.
Loo, Li Shen
author_facet Franek, Edward
Gerstein, Hertzel C.
Riddle, Matthew C.
Nicolay, Claudia
Hickey, Ana
Botros, Fady T.
Loo, Li Shen
author_sort Franek, Edward
collection PubMed
description AIM: To assess cardiovascular, glycaemic, weight and safety outcomes of long‐term treatment with dulaglutide 1.5 mg compared with placebo in patients with a baseline HbA1c of less than 7% versus 7% or higher. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intention‐to‐treat analyses were performed on REWIND participants with a baseline HbA1c measurement, using Cox proportional hazards regression and mixed model for repeated measures. Subgroup analyses with factors for baseline HbA1c categories and their interaction with treatment group, as well as analyses within the HbA1c subgroups, were conducted. Additionally, sensitivity analyses were performed for baseline HbA1c subgroups of 6.5% or less and more than 6.5%. RESULTS: Of the 9876 eligible participants, 3921 and 5955 had a baseline HbA1c of less than 7% and 7% or higher, respectively. Mean baseline HbA1c was 6.3% and 8.0% and the mean duration of diabetes was 9.0 and 11.6 years in the respective subgroups. The less than 7% subgroup was slightly older and less frequently insulin‐treated. There was no evidence of a differential dulaglutide treatment effect on body mass index (BMI) reduction, cardiovascular or safety outcomes of interest between the baseline HbA1c subgroups. Treatment‐by‐baseline HbA1c group interaction was significant for HbA1c change from baseline (P < .001), with a greater reduction in the subgroup with higher baseline HbA1c values. Sensitivity analyses by baseline HbA1c subgroups of 6.5% or less and more than 6.5% showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: The reduced incidence of cardiovascular events, and the reduction in BMI in participants treated with once‐weekly dulaglutide, were independent of the baseline HbA1c level. Conversely, participants with a higher baseline HbA1c level had greater reductions in HbA1c. Dulaglutide has a positive benefit–risk profile and can be considered in patients with comparatively well‐controlled HbA1c levels seeking optimal metabolic control and cardiovascular benefits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9543284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95432842022-10-14 Efficacy and safety outcomes of dulaglutide by baseline HbA1c: A post hoc analysis of the REWIND trial Franek, Edward Gerstein, Hertzel C. Riddle, Matthew C. Nicolay, Claudia Hickey, Ana Botros, Fady T. Loo, Li Shen Diabetes Obes Metab Original Articles AIM: To assess cardiovascular, glycaemic, weight and safety outcomes of long‐term treatment with dulaglutide 1.5 mg compared with placebo in patients with a baseline HbA1c of less than 7% versus 7% or higher. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intention‐to‐treat analyses were performed on REWIND participants with a baseline HbA1c measurement, using Cox proportional hazards regression and mixed model for repeated measures. Subgroup analyses with factors for baseline HbA1c categories and their interaction with treatment group, as well as analyses within the HbA1c subgroups, were conducted. Additionally, sensitivity analyses were performed for baseline HbA1c subgroups of 6.5% or less and more than 6.5%. RESULTS: Of the 9876 eligible participants, 3921 and 5955 had a baseline HbA1c of less than 7% and 7% or higher, respectively. Mean baseline HbA1c was 6.3% and 8.0% and the mean duration of diabetes was 9.0 and 11.6 years in the respective subgroups. The less than 7% subgroup was slightly older and less frequently insulin‐treated. There was no evidence of a differential dulaglutide treatment effect on body mass index (BMI) reduction, cardiovascular or safety outcomes of interest between the baseline HbA1c subgroups. Treatment‐by‐baseline HbA1c group interaction was significant for HbA1c change from baseline (P < .001), with a greater reduction in the subgroup with higher baseline HbA1c values. Sensitivity analyses by baseline HbA1c subgroups of 6.5% or less and more than 6.5% showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: The reduced incidence of cardiovascular events, and the reduction in BMI in participants treated with once‐weekly dulaglutide, were independent of the baseline HbA1c level. Conversely, participants with a higher baseline HbA1c level had greater reductions in HbA1c. Dulaglutide has a positive benefit–risk profile and can be considered in patients with comparatively well‐controlled HbA1c levels seeking optimal metabolic control and cardiovascular benefits. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022-05-30 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9543284/ /pubmed/35546279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.14760 Text en © 2022 Eli Lilly and Company. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Franek, Edward
Gerstein, Hertzel C.
Riddle, Matthew C.
Nicolay, Claudia
Hickey, Ana
Botros, Fady T.
Loo, Li Shen
Efficacy and safety outcomes of dulaglutide by baseline HbA1c: A post hoc analysis of the REWIND trial
title Efficacy and safety outcomes of dulaglutide by baseline HbA1c: A post hoc analysis of the REWIND trial
title_full Efficacy and safety outcomes of dulaglutide by baseline HbA1c: A post hoc analysis of the REWIND trial
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety outcomes of dulaglutide by baseline HbA1c: A post hoc analysis of the REWIND trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety outcomes of dulaglutide by baseline HbA1c: A post hoc analysis of the REWIND trial
title_short Efficacy and safety outcomes of dulaglutide by baseline HbA1c: A post hoc analysis of the REWIND trial
title_sort efficacy and safety outcomes of dulaglutide by baseline hba1c: a post hoc analysis of the rewind trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9543284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35546279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.14760
work_keys_str_mv AT franekedward efficacyandsafetyoutcomesofdulaglutidebybaselinehba1caposthocanalysisoftherewindtrial
AT gersteinhertzelc efficacyandsafetyoutcomesofdulaglutidebybaselinehba1caposthocanalysisoftherewindtrial
AT riddlematthewc efficacyandsafetyoutcomesofdulaglutidebybaselinehba1caposthocanalysisoftherewindtrial
AT nicolayclaudia efficacyandsafetyoutcomesofdulaglutidebybaselinehba1caposthocanalysisoftherewindtrial
AT hickeyana efficacyandsafetyoutcomesofdulaglutidebybaselinehba1caposthocanalysisoftherewindtrial
AT botrosfadyt efficacyandsafetyoutcomesofdulaglutidebybaselinehba1caposthocanalysisoftherewindtrial
AT loolishen efficacyandsafetyoutcomesofdulaglutidebybaselinehba1caposthocanalysisoftherewindtrial