Cargando…

Economic evaluation of CPD activities for healthcare professionals: A scoping review

CONTEXT: Continuing professional development (CPD) activities for healthcare professionals are central to the optimisation of patient safety and person‐centred care. Although there is some evidence on the economics of healthcare professionals training, very little is known about the costs and benefi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orlik, Witold, Aleo, Giuseppe, Kearns, Thomas, Briody, Jonathan, Wray, Jane, Mahon, Paul, Gazić, Mario, Radoš, Normela, García Vivar, Cristina, Lillo Crespo, Manuel, Fitzgerald, Catherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9543361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35451106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.14813
_version_ 1784804356838653952
author Orlik, Witold
Aleo, Giuseppe
Kearns, Thomas
Briody, Jonathan
Wray, Jane
Mahon, Paul
Gazić, Mario
Radoš, Normela
García Vivar, Cristina
Lillo Crespo, Manuel
Fitzgerald, Catherine
author_facet Orlik, Witold
Aleo, Giuseppe
Kearns, Thomas
Briody, Jonathan
Wray, Jane
Mahon, Paul
Gazić, Mario
Radoš, Normela
García Vivar, Cristina
Lillo Crespo, Manuel
Fitzgerald, Catherine
author_sort Orlik, Witold
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Continuing professional development (CPD) activities for healthcare professionals are central to the optimisation of patient safety and person‐centred care. Although there is some evidence on the economics of healthcare professionals training, very little is known about the costs and benefits of CPD. METHODS: This study aimed to review the research evidence on economic evaluations of CPD activities for healthcare professionals. CINAHL, MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Econlit and Web of Science databases were used to identify articles published between 2010 and 2021. RESULTS: Of the 6791 titles identified, 119 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this scoping review. The majority of articles were partial economic evaluations of CPD programmes (n = 70); half were from the USA. Studies that included multiple professions were most prevalent (n = 54), followed by nurses (n = 34) and doctors (n = 23). Patient outcomes were the most commonly reported outcome (n = 51), followed by change in clinical practice (n = 38) and healthcare professionals' knowledge gain (n = 19). CONCLUSIONS: There is an urgent call for more evidence regarding the economic evaluations of CPD. This is particularly important in view of the rising costs of healthcare globally. The majority of studies included in this review did not provide detailed information on the evaluations and many focused exclusively on the cost of CPD activities rather than outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9543361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95433612022-10-14 Economic evaluation of CPD activities for healthcare professionals: A scoping review Orlik, Witold Aleo, Giuseppe Kearns, Thomas Briody, Jonathan Wray, Jane Mahon, Paul Gazić, Mario Radoš, Normela García Vivar, Cristina Lillo Crespo, Manuel Fitzgerald, Catherine Med Educ Review Articles CONTEXT: Continuing professional development (CPD) activities for healthcare professionals are central to the optimisation of patient safety and person‐centred care. Although there is some evidence on the economics of healthcare professionals training, very little is known about the costs and benefits of CPD. METHODS: This study aimed to review the research evidence on economic evaluations of CPD activities for healthcare professionals. CINAHL, MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Econlit and Web of Science databases were used to identify articles published between 2010 and 2021. RESULTS: Of the 6791 titles identified, 119 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this scoping review. The majority of articles were partial economic evaluations of CPD programmes (n = 70); half were from the USA. Studies that included multiple professions were most prevalent (n = 54), followed by nurses (n = 34) and doctors (n = 23). Patient outcomes were the most commonly reported outcome (n = 51), followed by change in clinical practice (n = 38) and healthcare professionals' knowledge gain (n = 19). CONCLUSIONS: There is an urgent call for more evidence regarding the economic evaluations of CPD. This is particularly important in view of the rising costs of healthcare globally. The majority of studies included in this review did not provide detailed information on the evaluations and many focused exclusively on the cost of CPD activities rather than outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-29 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9543361/ /pubmed/35451106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.14813 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Medical Education published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Orlik, Witold
Aleo, Giuseppe
Kearns, Thomas
Briody, Jonathan
Wray, Jane
Mahon, Paul
Gazić, Mario
Radoš, Normela
García Vivar, Cristina
Lillo Crespo, Manuel
Fitzgerald, Catherine
Economic evaluation of CPD activities for healthcare professionals: A scoping review
title Economic evaluation of CPD activities for healthcare professionals: A scoping review
title_full Economic evaluation of CPD activities for healthcare professionals: A scoping review
title_fullStr Economic evaluation of CPD activities for healthcare professionals: A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluation of CPD activities for healthcare professionals: A scoping review
title_short Economic evaluation of CPD activities for healthcare professionals: A scoping review
title_sort economic evaluation of cpd activities for healthcare professionals: a scoping review
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9543361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35451106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.14813
work_keys_str_mv AT orlikwitold economicevaluationofcpdactivitiesforhealthcareprofessionalsascopingreview
AT aleogiuseppe economicevaluationofcpdactivitiesforhealthcareprofessionalsascopingreview
AT kearnsthomas economicevaluationofcpdactivitiesforhealthcareprofessionalsascopingreview
AT briodyjonathan economicevaluationofcpdactivitiesforhealthcareprofessionalsascopingreview
AT wrayjane economicevaluationofcpdactivitiesforhealthcareprofessionalsascopingreview
AT mahonpaul economicevaluationofcpdactivitiesforhealthcareprofessionalsascopingreview
AT gazicmario economicevaluationofcpdactivitiesforhealthcareprofessionalsascopingreview
AT radosnormela economicevaluationofcpdactivitiesforhealthcareprofessionalsascopingreview
AT garciavivarcristina economicevaluationofcpdactivitiesforhealthcareprofessionalsascopingreview
AT lillocrespomanuel economicevaluationofcpdactivitiesforhealthcareprofessionalsascopingreview
AT fitzgeraldcatherine economicevaluationofcpdactivitiesforhealthcareprofessionalsascopingreview