Cargando…
Dual species dry surface biofilms; Bacillus species impact on Staphylococcus aureus survival and surface disinfection
AIMS: Dry surface biofilms (DSB) survive on environmental surfaces throughout hospitals, able to resist cleaning and disinfection interventions. This study aimed to produce a dual species DSB and explore the ability of commercially available wipe products to eliminate pathogens within a dual species...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9543557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35543339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.15619 |
_version_ | 1784804400542253056 |
---|---|
author | Centeleghe, Isabella Norville, Phillip Hughes, Louise Maillard, Jean‐Yves |
author_facet | Centeleghe, Isabella Norville, Phillip Hughes, Louise Maillard, Jean‐Yves |
author_sort | Centeleghe, Isabella |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Dry surface biofilms (DSB) survive on environmental surfaces throughout hospitals, able to resist cleaning and disinfection interventions. This study aimed to produce a dual species DSB and explore the ability of commercially available wipe products to eliminate pathogens within a dual species DSB and prevent their transfer. METHODS AND RESULTS: Staphylococcus aureus was grown with two different species of Bacillus on stainless steel discs, over 12 days using sequential hydration and dehydration phases. A modified version of ASTM 2967–15 was used to test six wipe products including one water control with the Fitaflex Wiperator. Staphylococcus aureus growth was inhibited when combined with Bacillus subtilis. Recovery of S. aureus on agar from a dual DSB was not always consistent. Our results did not provide evidence that Bacillus licheniformis protected S. aureus from wipe action. There was no significant difference of S. aureus elimination by antimicrobial wipes between single and dual species DSB. B. licheniformis was easily transferred by the wipe itself and to new surfaces both in a single and dual species DSB, whilst several wipe products inhibited the transfer of S. aureus from wipe. However, S. aureus direct transfer to new surfaces was not inhibited post‐wiping. CONCLUSIONS: Although we observed that the dual DSB did not confer protection of S. aureus, we demonstrated that environmental species can persist on surfaces after disinfection treatment. Industries should test DSB against future products and hospitals should consider carefully the products they choose. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting on the production of a dual species DSB. Multispecies DSB have been identified throughout the world on hospital surfaces, but many studies focus on single species biofilms. This study has shown that DSB behave differently to hydrated biofilms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9543557 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95435572022-10-14 Dual species dry surface biofilms; Bacillus species impact on Staphylococcus aureus survival and surface disinfection Centeleghe, Isabella Norville, Phillip Hughes, Louise Maillard, Jean‐Yves J Appl Microbiol Original Articles AIMS: Dry surface biofilms (DSB) survive on environmental surfaces throughout hospitals, able to resist cleaning and disinfection interventions. This study aimed to produce a dual species DSB and explore the ability of commercially available wipe products to eliminate pathogens within a dual species DSB and prevent their transfer. METHODS AND RESULTS: Staphylococcus aureus was grown with two different species of Bacillus on stainless steel discs, over 12 days using sequential hydration and dehydration phases. A modified version of ASTM 2967–15 was used to test six wipe products including one water control with the Fitaflex Wiperator. Staphylococcus aureus growth was inhibited when combined with Bacillus subtilis. Recovery of S. aureus on agar from a dual DSB was not always consistent. Our results did not provide evidence that Bacillus licheniformis protected S. aureus from wipe action. There was no significant difference of S. aureus elimination by antimicrobial wipes between single and dual species DSB. B. licheniformis was easily transferred by the wipe itself and to new surfaces both in a single and dual species DSB, whilst several wipe products inhibited the transfer of S. aureus from wipe. However, S. aureus direct transfer to new surfaces was not inhibited post‐wiping. CONCLUSIONS: Although we observed that the dual DSB did not confer protection of S. aureus, we demonstrated that environmental species can persist on surfaces after disinfection treatment. Industries should test DSB against future products and hospitals should consider carefully the products they choose. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting on the production of a dual species DSB. Multispecies DSB have been identified throughout the world on hospital surfaces, but many studies focus on single species biofilms. This study has shown that DSB behave differently to hydrated biofilms. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-05 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9543557/ /pubmed/35543339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.15619 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Microbiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for Applied Microbiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Centeleghe, Isabella Norville, Phillip Hughes, Louise Maillard, Jean‐Yves Dual species dry surface biofilms; Bacillus species impact on Staphylococcus aureus survival and surface disinfection |
title | Dual species dry surface biofilms; Bacillus species impact on Staphylococcus aureus survival and surface disinfection |
title_full | Dual species dry surface biofilms; Bacillus species impact on Staphylococcus aureus survival and surface disinfection |
title_fullStr | Dual species dry surface biofilms; Bacillus species impact on Staphylococcus aureus survival and surface disinfection |
title_full_unstemmed | Dual species dry surface biofilms; Bacillus species impact on Staphylococcus aureus survival and surface disinfection |
title_short | Dual species dry surface biofilms; Bacillus species impact on Staphylococcus aureus survival and surface disinfection |
title_sort | dual species dry surface biofilms; bacillus species impact on staphylococcus aureus survival and surface disinfection |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9543557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35543339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.15619 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT centelegheisabella dualspeciesdrysurfacebiofilmsbacillusspeciesimpactonstaphylococcusaureussurvivalandsurfacedisinfection AT norvillephillip dualspeciesdrysurfacebiofilmsbacillusspeciesimpactonstaphylococcusaureussurvivalandsurfacedisinfection AT hugheslouise dualspeciesdrysurfacebiofilmsbacillusspeciesimpactonstaphylococcusaureussurvivalandsurfacedisinfection AT maillardjeanyves dualspeciesdrysurfacebiofilmsbacillusspeciesimpactonstaphylococcusaureussurvivalandsurfacedisinfection |