Cargando…

Affected other interventions: a systematic review and meta‐analysis across addictions

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Individuals impacted by someone else’s alcohol, illicit drug, gambling and gaming problems (affected others) experience extensive harms. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta‐analysis to determine the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions delivered...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merkouris, Stephanie S., Rodda, Simone N., Dowling, Nicki A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9543616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35129234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.15825
_version_ 1784804414635114496
author Merkouris, Stephanie S.
Rodda, Simone N.
Dowling, Nicki A.
author_facet Merkouris, Stephanie S.
Rodda, Simone N.
Dowling, Nicki A.
author_sort Merkouris, Stephanie S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Individuals impacted by someone else’s alcohol, illicit drug, gambling and gaming problems (affected others) experience extensive harms. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta‐analysis to determine the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions delivered to affected others across addictions. METHODS: This review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses. An electronic database search (PsycInfo, Medline, Cinahl and EMBASE) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until August 2021 was conducted. RCTs with passive control groups, evaluating psychosocial tertiary interventions delivered to affected others of people with addictions (problematic alcohol use, substance use, gambling or gaming) that did not require the involvement of the addicted person, were included. RESULTS: Twenty included studies, published in 22 articles, mainly evaluated interventions for alcohol use, followed by gambling and illicit drugs, with none investigating gaming interventions. The interventions mainly targeted partners/spouses and focused upon improving affected other outcomes, addicted person outcomes or both. Meta‐analyses revealed beneficial intervention effects over control groups on some affected other (depressive symptomatology [standardized mean difference (SMD) = −0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) = −0.67, –0.29], life satisfaction (SMD = −0.37, 95% CI = −0.71, −0.03) and coping style (SMD = −1.33, 95% CI = −1.87, –0.79), addicted person [treatment entry, risk ratio (RR) = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75–0.98] and relationship functioning outcomes (marital discord, SMD = −0.40, 95% CI = −0.61, −0.18) at post‐intervention. No beneficial intervention effects were identified at short‐term follow‐up (4–11 months post‐treatment). The beneficial intervention effects identified at post‐treatment remained when limiting to studies of alcohol use and therapist‐delivered interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial interventions delivered to affected others of people with addictions (problematic alcohol use, substance use, gambling or gaming) may be effective in improving some, but not all, affected other (depression, life satisfaction, coping), addicted person (treatment) and relationship functioning (marital discord) outcomes for affected others across the addictions, but the conclusion remains tentative due to limited studies and methodological limitations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9543616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95436162022-10-14 Affected other interventions: a systematic review and meta‐analysis across addictions Merkouris, Stephanie S. Rodda, Simone N. Dowling, Nicki A. Addiction Reviews BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Individuals impacted by someone else’s alcohol, illicit drug, gambling and gaming problems (affected others) experience extensive harms. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta‐analysis to determine the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions delivered to affected others across addictions. METHODS: This review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses. An electronic database search (PsycInfo, Medline, Cinahl and EMBASE) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until August 2021 was conducted. RCTs with passive control groups, evaluating psychosocial tertiary interventions delivered to affected others of people with addictions (problematic alcohol use, substance use, gambling or gaming) that did not require the involvement of the addicted person, were included. RESULTS: Twenty included studies, published in 22 articles, mainly evaluated interventions for alcohol use, followed by gambling and illicit drugs, with none investigating gaming interventions. The interventions mainly targeted partners/spouses and focused upon improving affected other outcomes, addicted person outcomes or both. Meta‐analyses revealed beneficial intervention effects over control groups on some affected other (depressive symptomatology [standardized mean difference (SMD) = −0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) = −0.67, –0.29], life satisfaction (SMD = −0.37, 95% CI = −0.71, −0.03) and coping style (SMD = −1.33, 95% CI = −1.87, –0.79), addicted person [treatment entry, risk ratio (RR) = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75–0.98] and relationship functioning outcomes (marital discord, SMD = −0.40, 95% CI = −0.61, −0.18) at post‐intervention. No beneficial intervention effects were identified at short‐term follow‐up (4–11 months post‐treatment). The beneficial intervention effects identified at post‐treatment remained when limiting to studies of alcohol use and therapist‐delivered interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial interventions delivered to affected others of people with addictions (problematic alcohol use, substance use, gambling or gaming) may be effective in improving some, but not all, affected other (depression, life satisfaction, coping), addicted person (treatment) and relationship functioning (marital discord) outcomes for affected others across the addictions, but the conclusion remains tentative due to limited studies and methodological limitations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-21 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9543616/ /pubmed/35129234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.15825 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Reviews
Merkouris, Stephanie S.
Rodda, Simone N.
Dowling, Nicki A.
Affected other interventions: a systematic review and meta‐analysis across addictions
title Affected other interventions: a systematic review and meta‐analysis across addictions
title_full Affected other interventions: a systematic review and meta‐analysis across addictions
title_fullStr Affected other interventions: a systematic review and meta‐analysis across addictions
title_full_unstemmed Affected other interventions: a systematic review and meta‐analysis across addictions
title_short Affected other interventions: a systematic review and meta‐analysis across addictions
title_sort affected other interventions: a systematic review and meta‐analysis across addictions
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9543616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35129234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.15825
work_keys_str_mv AT merkourisstephanies affectedotherinterventionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisacrossaddictions
AT roddasimonen affectedotherinterventionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisacrossaddictions
AT dowlingnickia affectedotherinterventionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisacrossaddictions