Cargando…
Gestational age at birth and outcome in monochorionic twins with different types of selective fetal growth restriction: A systematic literature review
This systematic review aims to assess the gestational age at birth and perinatal outcome [intrauterine demise (IUD), neonatal mortality and severe cerebral injury] in monochorionic twins with selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR), according to Gratacós classification based on umbilical artery Do...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9543733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35808908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.6206 |
_version_ | 1784804443956445184 |
---|---|
author | el Emrani, Salma Groene, Sophie G. Verweij, E. Joanne Slaghekke, Femke Khalil, Asma van Klink, Jeanine M. M. Tiblad, Eleonor Lewi, Liesbeth Lopriore, Enrico |
author_facet | el Emrani, Salma Groene, Sophie G. Verweij, E. Joanne Slaghekke, Femke Khalil, Asma van Klink, Jeanine M. M. Tiblad, Eleonor Lewi, Liesbeth Lopriore, Enrico |
author_sort | el Emrani, Salma |
collection | PubMed |
description | This systematic review aims to assess the gestational age at birth and perinatal outcome [intrauterine demise (IUD), neonatal mortality and severe cerebral injury] in monochorionic twins with selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR), according to Gratacós classification based on umbilical artery Doppler flow patterns in the smaller twin. Seventeen articles were included. Gestational age at birth varied from 33.0 to 36.0 weeks in type I, 27.6–32.4 weeks in type II, and 28.3–33.8 weeks in type III. IUD rate differed from 0%–4% in type I to 0%–40% in type II and 0%–23% in type III. Neonatal mortality rate was between 0%–10% in type I, 0%–38% in type II, and 0%–17% in type III. Cerebral injury was present in 0%–2% of type I, 2%–30% of type II and 0%–33% of type III cases. The timing of delivery in sFGR varied substantially among studies, particularly in type II and III. The quality of evidence was moderate due to heterogenous study populations with varying definitions of sFGR and perinatal outcome parameters, as well as a lack of consensus on the use of the Gratacós classification, leading to substantial incomparability. Our review identifies the urgent need for uniform antenatal diagnostic criteria and definitions of outcome parameters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9543733 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95437332022-10-14 Gestational age at birth and outcome in monochorionic twins with different types of selective fetal growth restriction: A systematic literature review el Emrani, Salma Groene, Sophie G. Verweij, E. Joanne Slaghekke, Femke Khalil, Asma van Klink, Jeanine M. M. Tiblad, Eleonor Lewi, Liesbeth Lopriore, Enrico Prenat Diagn Reviews This systematic review aims to assess the gestational age at birth and perinatal outcome [intrauterine demise (IUD), neonatal mortality and severe cerebral injury] in monochorionic twins with selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR), according to Gratacós classification based on umbilical artery Doppler flow patterns in the smaller twin. Seventeen articles were included. Gestational age at birth varied from 33.0 to 36.0 weeks in type I, 27.6–32.4 weeks in type II, and 28.3–33.8 weeks in type III. IUD rate differed from 0%–4% in type I to 0%–40% in type II and 0%–23% in type III. Neonatal mortality rate was between 0%–10% in type I, 0%–38% in type II, and 0%–17% in type III. Cerebral injury was present in 0%–2% of type I, 2%–30% of type II and 0%–33% of type III cases. The timing of delivery in sFGR varied substantially among studies, particularly in type II and III. The quality of evidence was moderate due to heterogenous study populations with varying definitions of sFGR and perinatal outcome parameters, as well as a lack of consensus on the use of the Gratacós classification, leading to substantial incomparability. Our review identifies the urgent need for uniform antenatal diagnostic criteria and definitions of outcome parameters. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-17 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9543733/ /pubmed/35808908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.6206 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Reviews el Emrani, Salma Groene, Sophie G. Verweij, E. Joanne Slaghekke, Femke Khalil, Asma van Klink, Jeanine M. M. Tiblad, Eleonor Lewi, Liesbeth Lopriore, Enrico Gestational age at birth and outcome in monochorionic twins with different types of selective fetal growth restriction: A systematic literature review |
title | Gestational age at birth and outcome in monochorionic twins with different types of selective fetal growth restriction: A systematic literature review |
title_full | Gestational age at birth and outcome in monochorionic twins with different types of selective fetal growth restriction: A systematic literature review |
title_fullStr | Gestational age at birth and outcome in monochorionic twins with different types of selective fetal growth restriction: A systematic literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | Gestational age at birth and outcome in monochorionic twins with different types of selective fetal growth restriction: A systematic literature review |
title_short | Gestational age at birth and outcome in monochorionic twins with different types of selective fetal growth restriction: A systematic literature review |
title_sort | gestational age at birth and outcome in monochorionic twins with different types of selective fetal growth restriction: a systematic literature review |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9543733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35808908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.6206 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elemranisalma gestationalageatbirthandoutcomeinmonochorionictwinswithdifferenttypesofselectivefetalgrowthrestrictionasystematicliteraturereview AT groenesophieg gestationalageatbirthandoutcomeinmonochorionictwinswithdifferenttypesofselectivefetalgrowthrestrictionasystematicliteraturereview AT verweijejoanne gestationalageatbirthandoutcomeinmonochorionictwinswithdifferenttypesofselectivefetalgrowthrestrictionasystematicliteraturereview AT slaghekkefemke gestationalageatbirthandoutcomeinmonochorionictwinswithdifferenttypesofselectivefetalgrowthrestrictionasystematicliteraturereview AT khalilasma gestationalageatbirthandoutcomeinmonochorionictwinswithdifferenttypesofselectivefetalgrowthrestrictionasystematicliteraturereview AT vanklinkjeaninemm gestationalageatbirthandoutcomeinmonochorionictwinswithdifferenttypesofselectivefetalgrowthrestrictionasystematicliteraturereview AT tibladeleonor gestationalageatbirthandoutcomeinmonochorionictwinswithdifferenttypesofselectivefetalgrowthrestrictionasystematicliteraturereview AT lewiliesbeth gestationalageatbirthandoutcomeinmonochorionictwinswithdifferenttypesofselectivefetalgrowthrestrictionasystematicliteraturereview AT loprioreenrico gestationalageatbirthandoutcomeinmonochorionictwinswithdifferenttypesofselectivefetalgrowthrestrictionasystematicliteraturereview |