Cargando…
Conformance of a 3T radiotherapy MRI scanner to the QIBA Diffusion Profile
PURPOSE: To assess the technical performance of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on a dedicated 3T radiotherapy scanner, using a standardized phantom and sequences. Investigations into factors that could impact the technical performance of ADC in the clinic were also completed, including cha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9543906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35365884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.15645 |
_version_ | 1784804480806551552 |
---|---|
author | Carr, Madeline E. Keenan, Kathryn E. Rai, Robba Boss, Michael A. Metcalfe, Peter Walker, Amy Holloway, Lois |
author_facet | Carr, Madeline E. Keenan, Kathryn E. Rai, Robba Boss, Michael A. Metcalfe, Peter Walker, Amy Holloway, Lois |
author_sort | Carr, Madeline E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess the technical performance of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on a dedicated 3T radiotherapy scanner, using a standardized phantom and sequences. Investigations into factors that could impact the technical performance of ADC in the clinic were also completed, including changing the slice‐encoded imaging direction and the reference sample ADC value. METHODS: ADC acquisitions were performed monthly on an isotropic diffusion phantom over 1 year. Measurements of ADC %bias, coefficients of variation for short‐/long‐term repeatability and precision (CV(ST)/CV(LT) and CV(P)), and b‐value dependency (Dep (b) ) were calculated. The measurements were then assessed according to the Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA) Diffusion Profile specifications. RESULTS: The average of all measurements over the year was within Profile recommended ranges. This included when testing was performed in different imaging directions, and on samples that had different ADC reference values (0.4–1.1 μm(2)/ms). Results in the axial plane for the central water vial included a bias of +0.05%, CV(ST) /CV(LT)/CV(P) = 0.1%/ 0.9%/0.4% and Dep (b) = 0.4%. CONCLUSIONS: The technical performance of ADC on a radiotherapy dedicated MRI scanner over the course of 12 months was considered conformant to the QIBA Profile. Quantifying these metrics and factors that may affect the performance is essential in progressing the use of ADC clinically: ensuring that the observed change of ADC in a tissue is due to a physiological response and not measurement variability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9543906 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95439062022-10-14 Conformance of a 3T radiotherapy MRI scanner to the QIBA Diffusion Profile Carr, Madeline E. Keenan, Kathryn E. Rai, Robba Boss, Michael A. Metcalfe, Peter Walker, Amy Holloway, Lois Med Phys QUANTITATIVE IMAGING AND IMAGE PROCESSING PURPOSE: To assess the technical performance of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on a dedicated 3T radiotherapy scanner, using a standardized phantom and sequences. Investigations into factors that could impact the technical performance of ADC in the clinic were also completed, including changing the slice‐encoded imaging direction and the reference sample ADC value. METHODS: ADC acquisitions were performed monthly on an isotropic diffusion phantom over 1 year. Measurements of ADC %bias, coefficients of variation for short‐/long‐term repeatability and precision (CV(ST)/CV(LT) and CV(P)), and b‐value dependency (Dep (b) ) were calculated. The measurements were then assessed according to the Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA) Diffusion Profile specifications. RESULTS: The average of all measurements over the year was within Profile recommended ranges. This included when testing was performed in different imaging directions, and on samples that had different ADC reference values (0.4–1.1 μm(2)/ms). Results in the axial plane for the central water vial included a bias of +0.05%, CV(ST) /CV(LT)/CV(P) = 0.1%/ 0.9%/0.4% and Dep (b) = 0.4%. CONCLUSIONS: The technical performance of ADC on a radiotherapy dedicated MRI scanner over the course of 12 months was considered conformant to the QIBA Profile. Quantifying these metrics and factors that may affect the performance is essential in progressing the use of ADC clinically: ensuring that the observed change of ADC in a tissue is due to a physiological response and not measurement variability. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-11 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9543906/ /pubmed/35365884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.15645 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | QUANTITATIVE IMAGING AND IMAGE PROCESSING Carr, Madeline E. Keenan, Kathryn E. Rai, Robba Boss, Michael A. Metcalfe, Peter Walker, Amy Holloway, Lois Conformance of a 3T radiotherapy MRI scanner to the QIBA Diffusion Profile |
title | Conformance of a 3T radiotherapy MRI scanner to the QIBA Diffusion Profile |
title_full | Conformance of a 3T radiotherapy MRI scanner to the QIBA Diffusion Profile |
title_fullStr | Conformance of a 3T radiotherapy MRI scanner to the QIBA Diffusion Profile |
title_full_unstemmed | Conformance of a 3T radiotherapy MRI scanner to the QIBA Diffusion Profile |
title_short | Conformance of a 3T radiotherapy MRI scanner to the QIBA Diffusion Profile |
title_sort | conformance of a 3t radiotherapy mri scanner to the qiba diffusion profile |
topic | QUANTITATIVE IMAGING AND IMAGE PROCESSING |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9543906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35365884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.15645 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carrmadelinee conformanceofa3tradiotherapymriscannertotheqibadiffusionprofile AT keenankathryne conformanceofa3tradiotherapymriscannertotheqibadiffusionprofile AT rairobba conformanceofa3tradiotherapymriscannertotheqibadiffusionprofile AT bossmichaela conformanceofa3tradiotherapymriscannertotheqibadiffusionprofile AT metcalfepeter conformanceofa3tradiotherapymriscannertotheqibadiffusionprofile AT walkeramy conformanceofa3tradiotherapymriscannertotheqibadiffusionprofile AT hollowaylois conformanceofa3tradiotherapymriscannertotheqibadiffusionprofile |