Cargando…

Conformance of a 3T radiotherapy MRI scanner to the QIBA Diffusion Profile

PURPOSE: To assess the technical performance of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on a dedicated 3T radiotherapy scanner, using a standardized phantom and sequences. Investigations into factors that could impact the technical performance of ADC in the clinic were also completed, including cha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carr, Madeline E., Keenan, Kathryn E., Rai, Robba, Boss, Michael A., Metcalfe, Peter, Walker, Amy, Holloway, Lois
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9543906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35365884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.15645
_version_ 1784804480806551552
author Carr, Madeline E.
Keenan, Kathryn E.
Rai, Robba
Boss, Michael A.
Metcalfe, Peter
Walker, Amy
Holloway, Lois
author_facet Carr, Madeline E.
Keenan, Kathryn E.
Rai, Robba
Boss, Michael A.
Metcalfe, Peter
Walker, Amy
Holloway, Lois
author_sort Carr, Madeline E.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the technical performance of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on a dedicated 3T radiotherapy scanner, using a standardized phantom and sequences. Investigations into factors that could impact the technical performance of ADC in the clinic were also completed, including changing the slice‐encoded imaging direction and the reference sample ADC value. METHODS: ADC acquisitions were performed monthly on an isotropic diffusion phantom over 1 year. Measurements of ADC %bias, coefficients of variation for short‐/long‐term repeatability and precision (CV(ST)/CV(LT) and CV(P)), and b‐value dependency (Dep (b) ) were calculated. The measurements were then assessed according to the Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA) Diffusion Profile specifications. RESULTS: The average of all measurements over the year was within Profile recommended ranges. This included when testing was performed in different imaging directions, and on samples that had different ADC reference values (0.4–1.1 μm(2)/ms). Results in the axial plane for the central water vial included a bias of +0.05%, CV(ST) /CV(LT)/CV(P) = 0.1%/ 0.9%/0.4% and Dep (b)  = 0.4%. CONCLUSIONS: The technical performance of ADC on a radiotherapy dedicated MRI scanner over the course of 12 months was considered conformant to the QIBA Profile. Quantifying these metrics and factors that may affect the performance is essential in progressing the use of ADC clinically: ensuring that the observed change of ADC in a tissue is due to a physiological response and not measurement variability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9543906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95439062022-10-14 Conformance of a 3T radiotherapy MRI scanner to the QIBA Diffusion Profile Carr, Madeline E. Keenan, Kathryn E. Rai, Robba Boss, Michael A. Metcalfe, Peter Walker, Amy Holloway, Lois Med Phys QUANTITATIVE IMAGING AND IMAGE PROCESSING PURPOSE: To assess the technical performance of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on a dedicated 3T radiotherapy scanner, using a standardized phantom and sequences. Investigations into factors that could impact the technical performance of ADC in the clinic were also completed, including changing the slice‐encoded imaging direction and the reference sample ADC value. METHODS: ADC acquisitions were performed monthly on an isotropic diffusion phantom over 1 year. Measurements of ADC %bias, coefficients of variation for short‐/long‐term repeatability and precision (CV(ST)/CV(LT) and CV(P)), and b‐value dependency (Dep (b) ) were calculated. The measurements were then assessed according to the Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA) Diffusion Profile specifications. RESULTS: The average of all measurements over the year was within Profile recommended ranges. This included when testing was performed in different imaging directions, and on samples that had different ADC reference values (0.4–1.1 μm(2)/ms). Results in the axial plane for the central water vial included a bias of +0.05%, CV(ST) /CV(LT)/CV(P) = 0.1%/ 0.9%/0.4% and Dep (b)  = 0.4%. CONCLUSIONS: The technical performance of ADC on a radiotherapy dedicated MRI scanner over the course of 12 months was considered conformant to the QIBA Profile. Quantifying these metrics and factors that may affect the performance is essential in progressing the use of ADC clinically: ensuring that the observed change of ADC in a tissue is due to a physiological response and not measurement variability. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-11 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9543906/ /pubmed/35365884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.15645 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle QUANTITATIVE IMAGING AND IMAGE PROCESSING
Carr, Madeline E.
Keenan, Kathryn E.
Rai, Robba
Boss, Michael A.
Metcalfe, Peter
Walker, Amy
Holloway, Lois
Conformance of a 3T radiotherapy MRI scanner to the QIBA Diffusion Profile
title Conformance of a 3T radiotherapy MRI scanner to the QIBA Diffusion Profile
title_full Conformance of a 3T radiotherapy MRI scanner to the QIBA Diffusion Profile
title_fullStr Conformance of a 3T radiotherapy MRI scanner to the QIBA Diffusion Profile
title_full_unstemmed Conformance of a 3T radiotherapy MRI scanner to the QIBA Diffusion Profile
title_short Conformance of a 3T radiotherapy MRI scanner to the QIBA Diffusion Profile
title_sort conformance of a 3t radiotherapy mri scanner to the qiba diffusion profile
topic QUANTITATIVE IMAGING AND IMAGE PROCESSING
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9543906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35365884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.15645
work_keys_str_mv AT carrmadelinee conformanceofa3tradiotherapymriscannertotheqibadiffusionprofile
AT keenankathryne conformanceofa3tradiotherapymriscannertotheqibadiffusionprofile
AT rairobba conformanceofa3tradiotherapymriscannertotheqibadiffusionprofile
AT bossmichaela conformanceofa3tradiotherapymriscannertotheqibadiffusionprofile
AT metcalfepeter conformanceofa3tradiotherapymriscannertotheqibadiffusionprofile
AT walkeramy conformanceofa3tradiotherapymriscannertotheqibadiffusionprofile
AT hollowaylois conformanceofa3tradiotherapymriscannertotheqibadiffusionprofile