Cargando…

Drug‐eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with medium‐sized versus small‐sized CalliSpheres microspheres in unresectable primary liver cancer

PURPOSE: The optimal microparticle size for drug‐eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB‐TACE) remains unknown. This retrospective cohort study analyzed the efficacy and safety of CalliSpheres microsphere embolization in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to dete...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Jiao, Feng, Guo‐an, Li, Yuliang, Wang, Wujie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9543937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34708554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajco.13660
_version_ 1784804488109883392
author Zhang, Jiao
Feng, Guo‐an
Li, Yuliang
Wang, Wujie
author_facet Zhang, Jiao
Feng, Guo‐an
Li, Yuliang
Wang, Wujie
author_sort Zhang, Jiao
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The optimal microparticle size for drug‐eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB‐TACE) remains unknown. This retrospective cohort study analyzed the efficacy and safety of CalliSpheres microsphere embolization in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to determine the influence of particle size on the results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty‐two patients with unresectable HCC were enrolled in this retrospective study from January 2018 to January 2020. Patients received DEB‐TACE with CalliSpheres of 100–300 μm (small‐size, n = 15) or 300–500 μm (medium‐size, n = 27). The tumor response was evaluated via enhanced CT or MRI at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment, based on the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Adverse events after DEB‐TACE were recorded. RESULTS: Complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were recorded in 20%, 20%, 33.3%, 26.7%, respectively, of patients in the small‐size group and 3.7%, 25.9%, 44.4%, 25.9% of patients in the medium‐size group, respectively. No significant difference was found between the two groups (p = 0.516). Major adverse events, including grade three liver toxicity (n = 4) and liver abscess (n = 3), occurred significantly more in the small‐size group, while none were reported in the medium size group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: DEB‐TACE with medium‐size (300–500 μm) CalliSpheres microspheres had similar efficacy and a better safety profile than DEB‐TACE with small‐size (100–300 μm) CalliSpheres, indicating that medium‐size microspheres may be a better choice for unresectable primary liver cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9543937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95439372022-10-14 Drug‐eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with medium‐sized versus small‐sized CalliSpheres microspheres in unresectable primary liver cancer Zhang, Jiao Feng, Guo‐an Li, Yuliang Wang, Wujie Asia Pac J Clin Oncol Original Articles PURPOSE: The optimal microparticle size for drug‐eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB‐TACE) remains unknown. This retrospective cohort study analyzed the efficacy and safety of CalliSpheres microsphere embolization in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to determine the influence of particle size on the results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty‐two patients with unresectable HCC were enrolled in this retrospective study from January 2018 to January 2020. Patients received DEB‐TACE with CalliSpheres of 100–300 μm (small‐size, n = 15) or 300–500 μm (medium‐size, n = 27). The tumor response was evaluated via enhanced CT or MRI at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment, based on the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Adverse events after DEB‐TACE were recorded. RESULTS: Complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were recorded in 20%, 20%, 33.3%, 26.7%, respectively, of patients in the small‐size group and 3.7%, 25.9%, 44.4%, 25.9% of patients in the medium‐size group, respectively. No significant difference was found between the two groups (p = 0.516). Major adverse events, including grade three liver toxicity (n = 4) and liver abscess (n = 3), occurred significantly more in the small‐size group, while none were reported in the medium size group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: DEB‐TACE with medium‐size (300–500 μm) CalliSpheres microspheres had similar efficacy and a better safety profile than DEB‐TACE with small‐size (100–300 μm) CalliSpheres, indicating that medium‐size microspheres may be a better choice for unresectable primary liver cancer. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-27 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9543937/ /pubmed/34708554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajco.13660 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Zhang, Jiao
Feng, Guo‐an
Li, Yuliang
Wang, Wujie
Drug‐eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with medium‐sized versus small‐sized CalliSpheres microspheres in unresectable primary liver cancer
title Drug‐eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with medium‐sized versus small‐sized CalliSpheres microspheres in unresectable primary liver cancer
title_full Drug‐eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with medium‐sized versus small‐sized CalliSpheres microspheres in unresectable primary liver cancer
title_fullStr Drug‐eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with medium‐sized versus small‐sized CalliSpheres microspheres in unresectable primary liver cancer
title_full_unstemmed Drug‐eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with medium‐sized versus small‐sized CalliSpheres microspheres in unresectable primary liver cancer
title_short Drug‐eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with medium‐sized versus small‐sized CalliSpheres microspheres in unresectable primary liver cancer
title_sort drug‐eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with medium‐sized versus small‐sized callispheres microspheres in unresectable primary liver cancer
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9543937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34708554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajco.13660
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangjiao drugelutingbeadtransarterialchemoembolizationwithmediumsizedversussmallsizedcallispheresmicrospheresinunresectableprimarylivercancer
AT fengguoan drugelutingbeadtransarterialchemoembolizationwithmediumsizedversussmallsizedcallispheresmicrospheresinunresectableprimarylivercancer
AT liyuliang drugelutingbeadtransarterialchemoembolizationwithmediumsizedversussmallsizedcallispheresmicrospheresinunresectableprimarylivercancer
AT wangwujie drugelutingbeadtransarterialchemoembolizationwithmediumsizedversussmallsizedcallispheresmicrospheresinunresectableprimarylivercancer