Cargando…
Relative perceptions of prevalence, impact and importance of photosensitisation in Australian livestock: A survey of veterinarians, livestock traders and livestock producers
AIMS: To investigate the relative differences in the perceptions and awareness of outbreaks of photosensitisation in Australian livestock stakeholders, including veterinarians, livestock traders and producers. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed and circulated to livestock veterinarians, producer...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9544138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35560033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/avj.13169 |
_version_ | 1784804533481766912 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Y Loukopoulos, P Xie, G Quinn, JC |
author_facet | Chen, Y Loukopoulos, P Xie, G Quinn, JC |
author_sort | Chen, Y |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To investigate the relative differences in the perceptions and awareness of outbreaks of photosensitisation in Australian livestock stakeholders, including veterinarians, livestock traders and producers. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed and circulated to livestock veterinarians, producers and traders in Australia via email addresses obtained from public access sources. The questionnaire was designed to evaluate participants' awareness and perception of health, welfare, and production issues associated with outbreaks of photosensitisation and towards the incidence and importance of photosensitisation in livestock. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty‐eight online responses were received in total. Nearly half of the respondents (49.0%) indicated they would encounter 1–3 outbreaks annually. The majority of veterinarian and livestock producers stated that outbreaks of photosensitisation were common and economically important, with cattle and sheep being equally considered as susceptible species to this condition, and secondary (hepatogeneous) photosensitisation is the most common type. CONCLUSION: This survey confirms the anecdotal evidence that photosensitisation in livestock in Australia is commonly encountered by veterinarians and livestock producers. However, there is no industry‐wide common acceptance of the issue, broader opinions should be canvassed when considering impacts on stakeholders regarding photosensitisation outbreaks in livestock in Australia or abroad in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9544138 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95441382022-10-14 Relative perceptions of prevalence, impact and importance of photosensitisation in Australian livestock: A survey of veterinarians, livestock traders and livestock producers Chen, Y Loukopoulos, P Xie, G Quinn, JC Aust Vet J Production Animals AIMS: To investigate the relative differences in the perceptions and awareness of outbreaks of photosensitisation in Australian livestock stakeholders, including veterinarians, livestock traders and producers. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed and circulated to livestock veterinarians, producers and traders in Australia via email addresses obtained from public access sources. The questionnaire was designed to evaluate participants' awareness and perception of health, welfare, and production issues associated with outbreaks of photosensitisation and towards the incidence and importance of photosensitisation in livestock. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty‐eight online responses were received in total. Nearly half of the respondents (49.0%) indicated they would encounter 1–3 outbreaks annually. The majority of veterinarian and livestock producers stated that outbreaks of photosensitisation were common and economically important, with cattle and sheep being equally considered as susceptible species to this condition, and secondary (hepatogeneous) photosensitisation is the most common type. CONCLUSION: This survey confirms the anecdotal evidence that photosensitisation in livestock in Australia is commonly encountered by veterinarians and livestock producers. However, there is no industry‐wide common acceptance of the issue, broader opinions should be canvassed when considering impacts on stakeholders regarding photosensitisation outbreaks in livestock in Australia or abroad in the future. Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2022-05-12 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9544138/ /pubmed/35560033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/avj.13169 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Australian Veterinary Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Veterinary Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Production Animals Chen, Y Loukopoulos, P Xie, G Quinn, JC Relative perceptions of prevalence, impact and importance of photosensitisation in Australian livestock: A survey of veterinarians, livestock traders and livestock producers |
title | Relative perceptions of prevalence, impact and importance of photosensitisation in Australian livestock: A survey of veterinarians, livestock traders and livestock producers |
title_full | Relative perceptions of prevalence, impact and importance of photosensitisation in Australian livestock: A survey of veterinarians, livestock traders and livestock producers |
title_fullStr | Relative perceptions of prevalence, impact and importance of photosensitisation in Australian livestock: A survey of veterinarians, livestock traders and livestock producers |
title_full_unstemmed | Relative perceptions of prevalence, impact and importance of photosensitisation in Australian livestock: A survey of veterinarians, livestock traders and livestock producers |
title_short | Relative perceptions of prevalence, impact and importance of photosensitisation in Australian livestock: A survey of veterinarians, livestock traders and livestock producers |
title_sort | relative perceptions of prevalence, impact and importance of photosensitisation in australian livestock: a survey of veterinarians, livestock traders and livestock producers |
topic | Production Animals |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9544138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35560033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/avj.13169 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cheny relativeperceptionsofprevalenceimpactandimportanceofphotosensitisationinaustralianlivestockasurveyofveterinarianslivestocktradersandlivestockproducers AT loukopoulosp relativeperceptionsofprevalenceimpactandimportanceofphotosensitisationinaustralianlivestockasurveyofveterinarianslivestocktradersandlivestockproducers AT xieg relativeperceptionsofprevalenceimpactandimportanceofphotosensitisationinaustralianlivestockasurveyofveterinarianslivestocktradersandlivestockproducers AT quinnjc relativeperceptionsofprevalenceimpactandimportanceofphotosensitisationinaustralianlivestockasurveyofveterinarianslivestocktradersandlivestockproducers |