Cargando…
Cervical length distribution among Brazilian pregnant population and risk factors for short cervix: A multicenter cross-sectional study
OBJECTIVE: Since there are populational differences and risk factors that influence the cervical length, the aim of the study was to construct a populational curve with measurements of the uterine cervix of pregnant women in the second trimester of pregnancy and to evaluate which variables were rela...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9544154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36206265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272128 |
_version_ | 1784804537391906816 |
---|---|
author | Marquart, Kaline Gomes Ferrari Silva, Thais Valeria Mol, Ben W. Cecatti, José Guilherme Passini, Renato Pereira, Cynara M. Guedes, Thaísa B. Fanton, Tatiana F. Pacagnella, Rodolfo C. |
author_facet | Marquart, Kaline Gomes Ferrari Silva, Thais Valeria Mol, Ben W. Cecatti, José Guilherme Passini, Renato Pereira, Cynara M. Guedes, Thaísa B. Fanton, Tatiana F. Pacagnella, Rodolfo C. |
author_sort | Marquart, Kaline Gomes Ferrari |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Since there are populational differences and risk factors that influence the cervical length, the aim of the study was to construct a populational curve with measurements of the uterine cervix of pregnant women in the second trimester of pregnancy and to evaluate which variables were related to cervical length (CL) ≤25 mm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter cross-sectional study performed at 17 hospitals in several regions of Brazil. From 2015 to 2019, transvaginal ultrasound scan was performed in women with singleton pregnancies at 18 0/7 to 22 6/7 weeks of gestation to measure the CL. We analyzed CL regarding its distribution and the risk factors for CL ≤25 mm using logistic regression. RESULTS: The percentage of CL ≤ 25mm was 6.67%. Shorter cervices, when measured using both straight and curve techniques, showed similar results: range 21.0–25.0 mm in straight versus 22.6–26.0 mm in curve measurement for the 5(th) percentile. However, the difference between the two techniques became more pronounced after the 75(th) percentile (range 41.0–42.0 mm straight x 43.6–45.0 mm in curve measurement). The risk factors identified for short cervix were low body mass index (BMI) (OR: 1.81 CI: 1.16–2.82), higher education (OR: 1.39 CI: 1.10–1.75) and personal history ([one prior miscarriage OR: 1.41 CI: 1.11–1.78 and ≥2 prior miscarriages OR: 1.67 CI: 1.24–2.25], preterm birth [OR: 1.70 CI: 1.12–2.59], previous low birth weight <2500 g [OR: 1.70 CI: 1.15–2.50], cervical surgery [OR: 4.33 CI: 2.58–7.27]). By contrast, obesity (OR: 0.64 CI: 0.51–0.82), living with a partner (OR: 0.76 CI: 0.61–0.95) and previous pregnancy (OR: 0.46 CI: 0.37–0.57) decreased the risk of short cervix. CONCLUSIONS: The CL distribution showed a relatively low percentage of cervix ≤25 mm. There may be populational differences in the CL distribution and this as well as the risk factors for short CL need to be considered when adopting a screening strategy for short cervix. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9544154 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95441542022-10-08 Cervical length distribution among Brazilian pregnant population and risk factors for short cervix: A multicenter cross-sectional study Marquart, Kaline Gomes Ferrari Silva, Thais Valeria Mol, Ben W. Cecatti, José Guilherme Passini, Renato Pereira, Cynara M. Guedes, Thaísa B. Fanton, Tatiana F. Pacagnella, Rodolfo C. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Since there are populational differences and risk factors that influence the cervical length, the aim of the study was to construct a populational curve with measurements of the uterine cervix of pregnant women in the second trimester of pregnancy and to evaluate which variables were related to cervical length (CL) ≤25 mm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter cross-sectional study performed at 17 hospitals in several regions of Brazil. From 2015 to 2019, transvaginal ultrasound scan was performed in women with singleton pregnancies at 18 0/7 to 22 6/7 weeks of gestation to measure the CL. We analyzed CL regarding its distribution and the risk factors for CL ≤25 mm using logistic regression. RESULTS: The percentage of CL ≤ 25mm was 6.67%. Shorter cervices, when measured using both straight and curve techniques, showed similar results: range 21.0–25.0 mm in straight versus 22.6–26.0 mm in curve measurement for the 5(th) percentile. However, the difference between the two techniques became more pronounced after the 75(th) percentile (range 41.0–42.0 mm straight x 43.6–45.0 mm in curve measurement). The risk factors identified for short cervix were low body mass index (BMI) (OR: 1.81 CI: 1.16–2.82), higher education (OR: 1.39 CI: 1.10–1.75) and personal history ([one prior miscarriage OR: 1.41 CI: 1.11–1.78 and ≥2 prior miscarriages OR: 1.67 CI: 1.24–2.25], preterm birth [OR: 1.70 CI: 1.12–2.59], previous low birth weight <2500 g [OR: 1.70 CI: 1.15–2.50], cervical surgery [OR: 4.33 CI: 2.58–7.27]). By contrast, obesity (OR: 0.64 CI: 0.51–0.82), living with a partner (OR: 0.76 CI: 0.61–0.95) and previous pregnancy (OR: 0.46 CI: 0.37–0.57) decreased the risk of short cervix. CONCLUSIONS: The CL distribution showed a relatively low percentage of cervix ≤25 mm. There may be populational differences in the CL distribution and this as well as the risk factors for short CL need to be considered when adopting a screening strategy for short cervix. Public Library of Science 2022-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9544154/ /pubmed/36206265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272128 Text en © 2022 Marquart et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Marquart, Kaline Gomes Ferrari Silva, Thais Valeria Mol, Ben W. Cecatti, José Guilherme Passini, Renato Pereira, Cynara M. Guedes, Thaísa B. Fanton, Tatiana F. Pacagnella, Rodolfo C. Cervical length distribution among Brazilian pregnant population and risk factors for short cervix: A multicenter cross-sectional study |
title | Cervical length distribution among Brazilian pregnant population and risk factors for short cervix: A multicenter cross-sectional study |
title_full | Cervical length distribution among Brazilian pregnant population and risk factors for short cervix: A multicenter cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Cervical length distribution among Brazilian pregnant population and risk factors for short cervix: A multicenter cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Cervical length distribution among Brazilian pregnant population and risk factors for short cervix: A multicenter cross-sectional study |
title_short | Cervical length distribution among Brazilian pregnant population and risk factors for short cervix: A multicenter cross-sectional study |
title_sort | cervical length distribution among brazilian pregnant population and risk factors for short cervix: a multicenter cross-sectional study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9544154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36206265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272128 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marquartkalinegomesferrari cervicallengthdistributionamongbrazilianpregnantpopulationandriskfactorsforshortcervixamulticentercrosssectionalstudy AT silvathaisvaleria cervicallengthdistributionamongbrazilianpregnantpopulationandriskfactorsforshortcervixamulticentercrosssectionalstudy AT molbenw cervicallengthdistributionamongbrazilianpregnantpopulationandriskfactorsforshortcervixamulticentercrosssectionalstudy AT cecattijoseguilherme cervicallengthdistributionamongbrazilianpregnantpopulationandriskfactorsforshortcervixamulticentercrosssectionalstudy AT passinirenato cervicallengthdistributionamongbrazilianpregnantpopulationandriskfactorsforshortcervixamulticentercrosssectionalstudy AT pereiracynaram cervicallengthdistributionamongbrazilianpregnantpopulationandriskfactorsforshortcervixamulticentercrosssectionalstudy AT guedesthaisab cervicallengthdistributionamongbrazilianpregnantpopulationandriskfactorsforshortcervixamulticentercrosssectionalstudy AT fantontatianaf cervicallengthdistributionamongbrazilianpregnantpopulationandriskfactorsforshortcervixamulticentercrosssectionalstudy AT pacagnellarodolfoc cervicallengthdistributionamongbrazilianpregnantpopulationandriskfactorsforshortcervixamulticentercrosssectionalstudy AT cervicallengthdistributionamongbrazilianpregnantpopulationandriskfactorsforshortcervixamulticentercrosssectionalstudy |