Cargando…

Cervical length distribution among Brazilian pregnant population and risk factors for short cervix: A multicenter cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: Since there are populational differences and risk factors that influence the cervical length, the aim of the study was to construct a populational curve with measurements of the uterine cervix of pregnant women in the second trimester of pregnancy and to evaluate which variables were rela...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marquart, Kaline Gomes Ferrari, Silva, Thais Valeria, Mol, Ben W., Cecatti, José Guilherme, Passini, Renato, Pereira, Cynara M., Guedes, Thaísa B., Fanton, Tatiana F., Pacagnella, Rodolfo C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9544154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36206265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272128
_version_ 1784804537391906816
author Marquart, Kaline Gomes Ferrari
Silva, Thais Valeria
Mol, Ben W.
Cecatti, José Guilherme
Passini, Renato
Pereira, Cynara M.
Guedes, Thaísa B.
Fanton, Tatiana F.
Pacagnella, Rodolfo C.
author_facet Marquart, Kaline Gomes Ferrari
Silva, Thais Valeria
Mol, Ben W.
Cecatti, José Guilherme
Passini, Renato
Pereira, Cynara M.
Guedes, Thaísa B.
Fanton, Tatiana F.
Pacagnella, Rodolfo C.
author_sort Marquart, Kaline Gomes Ferrari
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Since there are populational differences and risk factors that influence the cervical length, the aim of the study was to construct a populational curve with measurements of the uterine cervix of pregnant women in the second trimester of pregnancy and to evaluate which variables were related to cervical length (CL) ≤25 mm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter cross-sectional study performed at 17 hospitals in several regions of Brazil. From 2015 to 2019, transvaginal ultrasound scan was performed in women with singleton pregnancies at 18 0/7 to 22 6/7 weeks of gestation to measure the CL. We analyzed CL regarding its distribution and the risk factors for CL ≤25 mm using logistic regression. RESULTS: The percentage of CL ≤ 25mm was 6.67%. Shorter cervices, when measured using both straight and curve techniques, showed similar results: range 21.0–25.0 mm in straight versus 22.6–26.0 mm in curve measurement for the 5(th) percentile. However, the difference between the two techniques became more pronounced after the 75(th) percentile (range 41.0–42.0 mm straight x 43.6–45.0 mm in curve measurement). The risk factors identified for short cervix were low body mass index (BMI) (OR: 1.81 CI: 1.16–2.82), higher education (OR: 1.39 CI: 1.10–1.75) and personal history ([one prior miscarriage OR: 1.41 CI: 1.11–1.78 and ≥2 prior miscarriages OR: 1.67 CI: 1.24–2.25], preterm birth [OR: 1.70 CI: 1.12–2.59], previous low birth weight <2500 g [OR: 1.70 CI: 1.15–2.50], cervical surgery [OR: 4.33 CI: 2.58–7.27]). By contrast, obesity (OR: 0.64 CI: 0.51–0.82), living with a partner (OR: 0.76 CI: 0.61–0.95) and previous pregnancy (OR: 0.46 CI: 0.37–0.57) decreased the risk of short cervix. CONCLUSIONS: The CL distribution showed a relatively low percentage of cervix ≤25 mm. There may be populational differences in the CL distribution and this as well as the risk factors for short CL need to be considered when adopting a screening strategy for short cervix.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9544154
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95441542022-10-08 Cervical length distribution among Brazilian pregnant population and risk factors for short cervix: A multicenter cross-sectional study Marquart, Kaline Gomes Ferrari Silva, Thais Valeria Mol, Ben W. Cecatti, José Guilherme Passini, Renato Pereira, Cynara M. Guedes, Thaísa B. Fanton, Tatiana F. Pacagnella, Rodolfo C. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Since there are populational differences and risk factors that influence the cervical length, the aim of the study was to construct a populational curve with measurements of the uterine cervix of pregnant women in the second trimester of pregnancy and to evaluate which variables were related to cervical length (CL) ≤25 mm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter cross-sectional study performed at 17 hospitals in several regions of Brazil. From 2015 to 2019, transvaginal ultrasound scan was performed in women with singleton pregnancies at 18 0/7 to 22 6/7 weeks of gestation to measure the CL. We analyzed CL regarding its distribution and the risk factors for CL ≤25 mm using logistic regression. RESULTS: The percentage of CL ≤ 25mm was 6.67%. Shorter cervices, when measured using both straight and curve techniques, showed similar results: range 21.0–25.0 mm in straight versus 22.6–26.0 mm in curve measurement for the 5(th) percentile. However, the difference between the two techniques became more pronounced after the 75(th) percentile (range 41.0–42.0 mm straight x 43.6–45.0 mm in curve measurement). The risk factors identified for short cervix were low body mass index (BMI) (OR: 1.81 CI: 1.16–2.82), higher education (OR: 1.39 CI: 1.10–1.75) and personal history ([one prior miscarriage OR: 1.41 CI: 1.11–1.78 and ≥2 prior miscarriages OR: 1.67 CI: 1.24–2.25], preterm birth [OR: 1.70 CI: 1.12–2.59], previous low birth weight <2500 g [OR: 1.70 CI: 1.15–2.50], cervical surgery [OR: 4.33 CI: 2.58–7.27]). By contrast, obesity (OR: 0.64 CI: 0.51–0.82), living with a partner (OR: 0.76 CI: 0.61–0.95) and previous pregnancy (OR: 0.46 CI: 0.37–0.57) decreased the risk of short cervix. CONCLUSIONS: The CL distribution showed a relatively low percentage of cervix ≤25 mm. There may be populational differences in the CL distribution and this as well as the risk factors for short CL need to be considered when adopting a screening strategy for short cervix. Public Library of Science 2022-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9544154/ /pubmed/36206265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272128 Text en © 2022 Marquart et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Marquart, Kaline Gomes Ferrari
Silva, Thais Valeria
Mol, Ben W.
Cecatti, José Guilherme
Passini, Renato
Pereira, Cynara M.
Guedes, Thaísa B.
Fanton, Tatiana F.
Pacagnella, Rodolfo C.
Cervical length distribution among Brazilian pregnant population and risk factors for short cervix: A multicenter cross-sectional study
title Cervical length distribution among Brazilian pregnant population and risk factors for short cervix: A multicenter cross-sectional study
title_full Cervical length distribution among Brazilian pregnant population and risk factors for short cervix: A multicenter cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Cervical length distribution among Brazilian pregnant population and risk factors for short cervix: A multicenter cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Cervical length distribution among Brazilian pregnant population and risk factors for short cervix: A multicenter cross-sectional study
title_short Cervical length distribution among Brazilian pregnant population and risk factors for short cervix: A multicenter cross-sectional study
title_sort cervical length distribution among brazilian pregnant population and risk factors for short cervix: a multicenter cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9544154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36206265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272128
work_keys_str_mv AT marquartkalinegomesferrari cervicallengthdistributionamongbrazilianpregnantpopulationandriskfactorsforshortcervixamulticentercrosssectionalstudy
AT silvathaisvaleria cervicallengthdistributionamongbrazilianpregnantpopulationandriskfactorsforshortcervixamulticentercrosssectionalstudy
AT molbenw cervicallengthdistributionamongbrazilianpregnantpopulationandriskfactorsforshortcervixamulticentercrosssectionalstudy
AT cecattijoseguilherme cervicallengthdistributionamongbrazilianpregnantpopulationandriskfactorsforshortcervixamulticentercrosssectionalstudy
AT passinirenato cervicallengthdistributionamongbrazilianpregnantpopulationandriskfactorsforshortcervixamulticentercrosssectionalstudy
AT pereiracynaram cervicallengthdistributionamongbrazilianpregnantpopulationandriskfactorsforshortcervixamulticentercrosssectionalstudy
AT guedesthaisab cervicallengthdistributionamongbrazilianpregnantpopulationandriskfactorsforshortcervixamulticentercrosssectionalstudy
AT fantontatianaf cervicallengthdistributionamongbrazilianpregnantpopulationandriskfactorsforshortcervixamulticentercrosssectionalstudy
AT pacagnellarodolfoc cervicallengthdistributionamongbrazilianpregnantpopulationandriskfactorsforshortcervixamulticentercrosssectionalstudy
AT cervicallengthdistributionamongbrazilianpregnantpopulationandriskfactorsforshortcervixamulticentercrosssectionalstudy