Cargando…

Test–Retest Data for the Assessment of Breast MRI Radiomic Feature Repeatability

BACKGROUND: Radiomic features extracted from breast MRI have potential for diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive purposes. However, before they can be used as biomarkers in clinical decision support systems, features need to be repeatable and reproducible. OBJECTIVE: Identify repeatable radiomics f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Granzier, R.W.Y., Ibrahim, A., Primakov, S., Keek, S.A., Halilaj, I., Zwanenburg, A., Engelen, S.M.E., Lobbes, M.B.I., Lambin, P., Woodruff, H.C., Smidt, M.L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9544420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34936160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.28027
_version_ 1784804592076193792
author Granzier, R.W.Y.
Ibrahim, A.
Primakov, S.
Keek, S.A.
Halilaj, I.
Zwanenburg, A.
Engelen, S.M.E.
Lobbes, M.B.I.
Lambin, P.
Woodruff, H.C.
Smidt, M.L.
author_facet Granzier, R.W.Y.
Ibrahim, A.
Primakov, S.
Keek, S.A.
Halilaj, I.
Zwanenburg, A.
Engelen, S.M.E.
Lobbes, M.B.I.
Lambin, P.
Woodruff, H.C.
Smidt, M.L.
author_sort Granzier, R.W.Y.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Radiomic features extracted from breast MRI have potential for diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive purposes. However, before they can be used as biomarkers in clinical decision support systems, features need to be repeatable and reproducible. OBJECTIVE: Identify repeatable radiomics features within breast tissue on prospectively collected MRI exams through multiple test–retest measurements. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: 11 healthy female volunteers. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5 T; MRI exams, comprising T2‐weighted turbo spin‐echo (T2W) sequence, native T1‐weighted turbo gradient‐echo (T1W) sequence, diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) sequence using b‐values 0/150/800, and corresponding derived ADC maps. ASSESSMENT: 18 MRI exams (three test–retest settings, repeated on 2 days) per healthy volunteer were examined on an identical scanner using a fixed clinical breast protocol. For each scan, 91 features were extracted from the 3D manually segmented right breast using Pyradiomics, before and after image preprocessing. Image preprocessing consisted of 1) bias field correction (BFC); 2) z‐score normalization with and without BFC; 3) grayscale discretization using 32 and 64 bins with and without BFC; and 4) z‐score normalization + grayscale discretization using 32 and 64 bins with and without BFC. STATISTICAL TESTS: Features' repeatability was assessed using concordance correlation coefficient(CCC) for each pair, i.e. each MRI was compared to each of the remaining 17 MRI with a cut‐off value of CCC > 0.90. RESULTS: Images without preprocessing produced the highest number of repeatable features for both T1W sequence and ADC maps with 15 of 91 (16.5%) and 8 of 91 (8.8%) repeatable features, respectively. Preprocessed images produced between 4 of 91 (4.4%) and 14 of 91 (15.4%), and 6 of 91 (6.6%) and 7 of 91 (7.7%) repeatable features, respectively for T1W and ADC maps. Z‐score normalization produced highest number of repeatable features, 26 of 91 (28.6%) in T2W sequences, in these images, no preprocessing produced 11 of 91 (12.1%) repeatable features. DATA CONCLUSION: Radiomic features extracted from T1W, T2W sequences and ADC maps from breast MRI exams showed a varying number of repeatable features, depending on the sequence. Effects of different preprocessing procedures on repeatability of features were different for each sequence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 1
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9544420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95444202022-10-14 Test–Retest Data for the Assessment of Breast MRI Radiomic Feature Repeatability Granzier, R.W.Y. Ibrahim, A. Primakov, S. Keek, S.A. Halilaj, I. Zwanenburg, A. Engelen, S.M.E. Lobbes, M.B.I. Lambin, P. Woodruff, H.C. Smidt, M.L. J Magn Reson Imaging Research Articles BACKGROUND: Radiomic features extracted from breast MRI have potential for diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive purposes. However, before they can be used as biomarkers in clinical decision support systems, features need to be repeatable and reproducible. OBJECTIVE: Identify repeatable radiomics features within breast tissue on prospectively collected MRI exams through multiple test–retest measurements. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: 11 healthy female volunteers. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5 T; MRI exams, comprising T2‐weighted turbo spin‐echo (T2W) sequence, native T1‐weighted turbo gradient‐echo (T1W) sequence, diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) sequence using b‐values 0/150/800, and corresponding derived ADC maps. ASSESSMENT: 18 MRI exams (three test–retest settings, repeated on 2 days) per healthy volunteer were examined on an identical scanner using a fixed clinical breast protocol. For each scan, 91 features were extracted from the 3D manually segmented right breast using Pyradiomics, before and after image preprocessing. Image preprocessing consisted of 1) bias field correction (BFC); 2) z‐score normalization with and without BFC; 3) grayscale discretization using 32 and 64 bins with and without BFC; and 4) z‐score normalization + grayscale discretization using 32 and 64 bins with and without BFC. STATISTICAL TESTS: Features' repeatability was assessed using concordance correlation coefficient(CCC) for each pair, i.e. each MRI was compared to each of the remaining 17 MRI with a cut‐off value of CCC > 0.90. RESULTS: Images without preprocessing produced the highest number of repeatable features for both T1W sequence and ADC maps with 15 of 91 (16.5%) and 8 of 91 (8.8%) repeatable features, respectively. Preprocessed images produced between 4 of 91 (4.4%) and 14 of 91 (15.4%), and 6 of 91 (6.6%) and 7 of 91 (7.7%) repeatable features, respectively for T1W and ADC maps. Z‐score normalization produced highest number of repeatable features, 26 of 91 (28.6%) in T2W sequences, in these images, no preprocessing produced 11 of 91 (12.1%) repeatable features. DATA CONCLUSION: Radiomic features extracted from T1W, T2W sequences and ADC maps from breast MRI exams showed a varying number of repeatable features, depending on the sequence. Effects of different preprocessing procedures on repeatability of features were different for each sequence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 1 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-12-22 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9544420/ /pubmed/34936160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.28027 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Granzier, R.W.Y.
Ibrahim, A.
Primakov, S.
Keek, S.A.
Halilaj, I.
Zwanenburg, A.
Engelen, S.M.E.
Lobbes, M.B.I.
Lambin, P.
Woodruff, H.C.
Smidt, M.L.
Test–Retest Data for the Assessment of Breast MRI Radiomic Feature Repeatability
title Test–Retest Data for the Assessment of Breast MRI Radiomic Feature Repeatability
title_full Test–Retest Data for the Assessment of Breast MRI Radiomic Feature Repeatability
title_fullStr Test–Retest Data for the Assessment of Breast MRI Radiomic Feature Repeatability
title_full_unstemmed Test–Retest Data for the Assessment of Breast MRI Radiomic Feature Repeatability
title_short Test–Retest Data for the Assessment of Breast MRI Radiomic Feature Repeatability
title_sort test–retest data for the assessment of breast mri radiomic feature repeatability
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9544420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34936160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.28027
work_keys_str_mv AT granzierrwy testretestdatafortheassessmentofbreastmriradiomicfeaturerepeatability
AT ibrahima testretestdatafortheassessmentofbreastmriradiomicfeaturerepeatability
AT primakovs testretestdatafortheassessmentofbreastmriradiomicfeaturerepeatability
AT keeksa testretestdatafortheassessmentofbreastmriradiomicfeaturerepeatability
AT halilaji testretestdatafortheassessmentofbreastmriradiomicfeaturerepeatability
AT zwanenburga testretestdatafortheassessmentofbreastmriradiomicfeaturerepeatability
AT engelensme testretestdatafortheassessmentofbreastmriradiomicfeaturerepeatability
AT lobbesmbi testretestdatafortheassessmentofbreastmriradiomicfeaturerepeatability
AT lambinp testretestdatafortheassessmentofbreastmriradiomicfeaturerepeatability
AT woodruffhc testretestdatafortheassessmentofbreastmriradiomicfeaturerepeatability
AT smidtml testretestdatafortheassessmentofbreastmriradiomicfeaturerepeatability