Cargando…
Evaluation of six methods for external attachment of electronic tags to fish: assessment of tag retention, growth and fish welfare
External attachment of electronic tags has been increasingly used in fish studies. Many researchers have used ad hoc attachment methods and provided little or no validation for the assumption that tagging itself does not bias animal behaviour or survival. The authors compared six previously publishe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9544572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34997931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jfb.14989 |
_version_ | 1784804625887526912 |
---|---|
author | Runde, Brendan J. Buckel, Jeffrey A. Bacheler, Nathan M. Tharp, Ryan M. Rudershausen, Paul J. Harms, Craig A. Ben‐Horin, Tal |
author_facet | Runde, Brendan J. Buckel, Jeffrey A. Bacheler, Nathan M. Tharp, Ryan M. Rudershausen, Paul J. Harms, Craig A. Ben‐Horin, Tal |
author_sort | Runde, Brendan J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | External attachment of electronic tags has been increasingly used in fish studies. Many researchers have used ad hoc attachment methods and provided little or no validation for the assumption that tagging itself does not bias animal behaviour or survival. The authors compared six previously published methods for externally attaching acoustic transmitters to fish in a tank holding experiment with black sea bass Centropristis striata (L.). They tracked tag retention, fish growth and external trauma (as a measure of fish welfare) for 60 days. For each of these metrics, the results showed a wide range of responses among tagging treatments. A simple attachment method using a spaghetti tag passed through the dorsal musculature of the fish and tied to the end cap of the transmitter emerged as the preferred option based on high retention, no impact on growth and relatively low detriment to fish welfare. Future field studies using external electronic tagging should consider tag‐related effects that could compromise results when selecting a method for tag attachment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9544572 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95445722022-10-14 Evaluation of six methods for external attachment of electronic tags to fish: assessment of tag retention, growth and fish welfare Runde, Brendan J. Buckel, Jeffrey A. Bacheler, Nathan M. Tharp, Ryan M. Rudershausen, Paul J. Harms, Craig A. Ben‐Horin, Tal J Fish Biol Regular Papers External attachment of electronic tags has been increasingly used in fish studies. Many researchers have used ad hoc attachment methods and provided little or no validation for the assumption that tagging itself does not bias animal behaviour or survival. The authors compared six previously published methods for externally attaching acoustic transmitters to fish in a tank holding experiment with black sea bass Centropristis striata (L.). They tracked tag retention, fish growth and external trauma (as a measure of fish welfare) for 60 days. For each of these metrics, the results showed a wide range of responses among tagging treatments. A simple attachment method using a spaghetti tag passed through the dorsal musculature of the fish and tied to the end cap of the transmitter emerged as the preferred option based on high retention, no impact on growth and relatively low detriment to fish welfare. Future field studies using external electronic tagging should consider tag‐related effects that could compromise results when selecting a method for tag attachment. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022-01-23 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9544572/ /pubmed/34997931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jfb.14989 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Fish Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Fisheries Society of the British Isles. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Regular Papers Runde, Brendan J. Buckel, Jeffrey A. Bacheler, Nathan M. Tharp, Ryan M. Rudershausen, Paul J. Harms, Craig A. Ben‐Horin, Tal Evaluation of six methods for external attachment of electronic tags to fish: assessment of tag retention, growth and fish welfare |
title | Evaluation of six methods for external attachment of electronic tags to fish: assessment of tag retention, growth and fish welfare |
title_full | Evaluation of six methods for external attachment of electronic tags to fish: assessment of tag retention, growth and fish welfare |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of six methods for external attachment of electronic tags to fish: assessment of tag retention, growth and fish welfare |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of six methods for external attachment of electronic tags to fish: assessment of tag retention, growth and fish welfare |
title_short | Evaluation of six methods for external attachment of electronic tags to fish: assessment of tag retention, growth and fish welfare |
title_sort | evaluation of six methods for external attachment of electronic tags to fish: assessment of tag retention, growth and fish welfare |
topic | Regular Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9544572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34997931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jfb.14989 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rundebrendanj evaluationofsixmethodsforexternalattachmentofelectronictagstofishassessmentoftagretentiongrowthandfishwelfare AT buckeljeffreya evaluationofsixmethodsforexternalattachmentofelectronictagstofishassessmentoftagretentiongrowthandfishwelfare AT bachelernathanm evaluationofsixmethodsforexternalattachmentofelectronictagstofishassessmentoftagretentiongrowthandfishwelfare AT tharpryanm evaluationofsixmethodsforexternalattachmentofelectronictagstofishassessmentoftagretentiongrowthandfishwelfare AT rudershausenpaulj evaluationofsixmethodsforexternalattachmentofelectronictagstofishassessmentoftagretentiongrowthandfishwelfare AT harmscraiga evaluationofsixmethodsforexternalattachmentofelectronictagstofishassessmentoftagretentiongrowthandfishwelfare AT benhorintal evaluationofsixmethodsforexternalattachmentofelectronictagstofishassessmentoftagretentiongrowthandfishwelfare |