Cargando…

Evaluation of six methods for external attachment of electronic tags to fish: assessment of tag retention, growth and fish welfare

External attachment of electronic tags has been increasingly used in fish studies. Many researchers have used ad hoc attachment methods and provided little or no validation for the assumption that tagging itself does not bias animal behaviour or survival. The authors compared six previously publishe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Runde, Brendan J., Buckel, Jeffrey A., Bacheler, Nathan M., Tharp, Ryan M., Rudershausen, Paul J., Harms, Craig A., Ben‐Horin, Tal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9544572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34997931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jfb.14989
_version_ 1784804625887526912
author Runde, Brendan J.
Buckel, Jeffrey A.
Bacheler, Nathan M.
Tharp, Ryan M.
Rudershausen, Paul J.
Harms, Craig A.
Ben‐Horin, Tal
author_facet Runde, Brendan J.
Buckel, Jeffrey A.
Bacheler, Nathan M.
Tharp, Ryan M.
Rudershausen, Paul J.
Harms, Craig A.
Ben‐Horin, Tal
author_sort Runde, Brendan J.
collection PubMed
description External attachment of electronic tags has been increasingly used in fish studies. Many researchers have used ad hoc attachment methods and provided little or no validation for the assumption that tagging itself does not bias animal behaviour or survival. The authors compared six previously published methods for externally attaching acoustic transmitters to fish in a tank holding experiment with black sea bass Centropristis striata (L.). They tracked tag retention, fish growth and external trauma (as a measure of fish welfare) for 60 days. For each of these metrics, the results showed a wide range of responses among tagging treatments. A simple attachment method using a spaghetti tag passed through the dorsal musculature of the fish and tied to the end cap of the transmitter emerged as the preferred option based on high retention, no impact on growth and relatively low detriment to fish welfare. Future field studies using external electronic tagging should consider tag‐related effects that could compromise results when selecting a method for tag attachment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9544572
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95445722022-10-14 Evaluation of six methods for external attachment of electronic tags to fish: assessment of tag retention, growth and fish welfare Runde, Brendan J. Buckel, Jeffrey A. Bacheler, Nathan M. Tharp, Ryan M. Rudershausen, Paul J. Harms, Craig A. Ben‐Horin, Tal J Fish Biol Regular Papers External attachment of electronic tags has been increasingly used in fish studies. Many researchers have used ad hoc attachment methods and provided little or no validation for the assumption that tagging itself does not bias animal behaviour or survival. The authors compared six previously published methods for externally attaching acoustic transmitters to fish in a tank holding experiment with black sea bass Centropristis striata (L.). They tracked tag retention, fish growth and external trauma (as a measure of fish welfare) for 60 days. For each of these metrics, the results showed a wide range of responses among tagging treatments. A simple attachment method using a spaghetti tag passed through the dorsal musculature of the fish and tied to the end cap of the transmitter emerged as the preferred option based on high retention, no impact on growth and relatively low detriment to fish welfare. Future field studies using external electronic tagging should consider tag‐related effects that could compromise results when selecting a method for tag attachment. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022-01-23 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9544572/ /pubmed/34997931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jfb.14989 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Fish Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Fisheries Society of the British Isles. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Regular Papers
Runde, Brendan J.
Buckel, Jeffrey A.
Bacheler, Nathan M.
Tharp, Ryan M.
Rudershausen, Paul J.
Harms, Craig A.
Ben‐Horin, Tal
Evaluation of six methods for external attachment of electronic tags to fish: assessment of tag retention, growth and fish welfare
title Evaluation of six methods for external attachment of electronic tags to fish: assessment of tag retention, growth and fish welfare
title_full Evaluation of six methods for external attachment of electronic tags to fish: assessment of tag retention, growth and fish welfare
title_fullStr Evaluation of six methods for external attachment of electronic tags to fish: assessment of tag retention, growth and fish welfare
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of six methods for external attachment of electronic tags to fish: assessment of tag retention, growth and fish welfare
title_short Evaluation of six methods for external attachment of electronic tags to fish: assessment of tag retention, growth and fish welfare
title_sort evaluation of six methods for external attachment of electronic tags to fish: assessment of tag retention, growth and fish welfare
topic Regular Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9544572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34997931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jfb.14989
work_keys_str_mv AT rundebrendanj evaluationofsixmethodsforexternalattachmentofelectronictagstofishassessmentoftagretentiongrowthandfishwelfare
AT buckeljeffreya evaluationofsixmethodsforexternalattachmentofelectronictagstofishassessmentoftagretentiongrowthandfishwelfare
AT bachelernathanm evaluationofsixmethodsforexternalattachmentofelectronictagstofishassessmentoftagretentiongrowthandfishwelfare
AT tharpryanm evaluationofsixmethodsforexternalattachmentofelectronictagstofishassessmentoftagretentiongrowthandfishwelfare
AT rudershausenpaulj evaluationofsixmethodsforexternalattachmentofelectronictagstofishassessmentoftagretentiongrowthandfishwelfare
AT harmscraiga evaluationofsixmethodsforexternalattachmentofelectronictagstofishassessmentoftagretentiongrowthandfishwelfare
AT benhorintal evaluationofsixmethodsforexternalattachmentofelectronictagstofishassessmentoftagretentiongrowthandfishwelfare