Cargando…

Electronegative electroretinogram in the modern multimodal imaging era

BACKGROUND: The electronegative electroretinogram (ERG) reflecting inner retinal dysfunction can assist as a diagnostic tool to determine the anatomical location in eye disease. The aim of this study is to determine the frequency and aetiology of electronegative ERG in a tertiary ophthalmology centr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sakti, Dhimas H., Ali, Haipha, Korsakova, Maria, Saakova, Nonna, Mustafic, Nina, Fraser, Clare L., Jamieson, Robyn V., Cornish, Elisa E., Grigg, John R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9544723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35212129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ceo.14065
_version_ 1784804660917305344
author Sakti, Dhimas H.
Ali, Haipha
Korsakova, Maria
Saakova, Nonna
Mustafic, Nina
Fraser, Clare L.
Jamieson, Robyn V.
Cornish, Elisa E.
Grigg, John R.
author_facet Sakti, Dhimas H.
Ali, Haipha
Korsakova, Maria
Saakova, Nonna
Mustafic, Nina
Fraser, Clare L.
Jamieson, Robyn V.
Cornish, Elisa E.
Grigg, John R.
author_sort Sakti, Dhimas H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The electronegative electroretinogram (ERG) reflecting inner retinal dysfunction can assist as a diagnostic tool to determine the anatomical location in eye disease. The aim of this study is to determine the frequency and aetiology of electronegative ERG in a tertiary ophthalmology centre and to develop a clinical algorithm to assist patient management. METHODS: Retrospective review of ERGs performed at the Save Sight Institute from January 2011 to December 2020. ERGs were performed according to ISCEV standard. The b:a ratio was analysed in dark adapted (DA) 3.0 or 12.0 recordings. Patients with ratio of ≤1.0 were included. RESULTS: A total of 4421 patients had ERGs performed during study period, of which 139 patients (3.1%) had electronegative ERG. The electronegative ERG patients' median age at referral time was 37 (0.7–90.6) years. The causative aetiologies were photoreceptor dystrophy (48, 34.5%), Congenital Stationary Night Blindness (CSNB) (33, 23.7%), retinal ischemia (18, 12.9%), retinoschisis (15, 10.8%), paraneoplastic autoimmune retinopathy (PAIR) and nonPAIR (14, 10.1%), batten disease (4, 2.9%), and inflammatory retinopathy (4, 2.9%). There were three patients with an unclassified diagnosis. Thirty‐two patients (23%) had good vision and a normal fundus appearance. Eleven patients (7.9%) had good vision and normal results in all multimodal imaging. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of electronegative ERG in our referral centre was 3.1% with photoreceptor dystrophy as the main aetiology. A significant number of the cases had good vision with normal fundus or normal multimodal imaging. This further highlights the value of an ERG in this modern multimodal imaging era.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9544723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95447232022-10-14 Electronegative electroretinogram in the modern multimodal imaging era Sakti, Dhimas H. Ali, Haipha Korsakova, Maria Saakova, Nonna Mustafic, Nina Fraser, Clare L. Jamieson, Robyn V. Cornish, Elisa E. Grigg, John R. Clin Exp Ophthalmol ORIGINAL ARTICLES BACKGROUND: The electronegative electroretinogram (ERG) reflecting inner retinal dysfunction can assist as a diagnostic tool to determine the anatomical location in eye disease. The aim of this study is to determine the frequency and aetiology of electronegative ERG in a tertiary ophthalmology centre and to develop a clinical algorithm to assist patient management. METHODS: Retrospective review of ERGs performed at the Save Sight Institute from January 2011 to December 2020. ERGs were performed according to ISCEV standard. The b:a ratio was analysed in dark adapted (DA) 3.0 or 12.0 recordings. Patients with ratio of ≤1.0 were included. RESULTS: A total of 4421 patients had ERGs performed during study period, of which 139 patients (3.1%) had electronegative ERG. The electronegative ERG patients' median age at referral time was 37 (0.7–90.6) years. The causative aetiologies were photoreceptor dystrophy (48, 34.5%), Congenital Stationary Night Blindness (CSNB) (33, 23.7%), retinal ischemia (18, 12.9%), retinoschisis (15, 10.8%), paraneoplastic autoimmune retinopathy (PAIR) and nonPAIR (14, 10.1%), batten disease (4, 2.9%), and inflammatory retinopathy (4, 2.9%). There were three patients with an unclassified diagnosis. Thirty‐two patients (23%) had good vision and a normal fundus appearance. Eleven patients (7.9%) had good vision and normal results in all multimodal imaging. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of electronegative ERG in our referral centre was 3.1% with photoreceptor dystrophy as the main aetiology. A significant number of the cases had good vision with normal fundus or normal multimodal imaging. This further highlights the value of an ERG in this modern multimodal imaging era. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-03-08 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9544723/ /pubmed/35212129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ceo.14065 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Sakti, Dhimas H.
Ali, Haipha
Korsakova, Maria
Saakova, Nonna
Mustafic, Nina
Fraser, Clare L.
Jamieson, Robyn V.
Cornish, Elisa E.
Grigg, John R.
Electronegative electroretinogram in the modern multimodal imaging era
title Electronegative electroretinogram in the modern multimodal imaging era
title_full Electronegative electroretinogram in the modern multimodal imaging era
title_fullStr Electronegative electroretinogram in the modern multimodal imaging era
title_full_unstemmed Electronegative electroretinogram in the modern multimodal imaging era
title_short Electronegative electroretinogram in the modern multimodal imaging era
title_sort electronegative electroretinogram in the modern multimodal imaging era
topic ORIGINAL ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9544723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35212129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ceo.14065
work_keys_str_mv AT saktidhimash electronegativeelectroretinograminthemodernmultimodalimagingera
AT alihaipha electronegativeelectroretinograminthemodernmultimodalimagingera
AT korsakovamaria electronegativeelectroretinograminthemodernmultimodalimagingera
AT saakovanonna electronegativeelectroretinograminthemodernmultimodalimagingera
AT mustaficnina electronegativeelectroretinograminthemodernmultimodalimagingera
AT fraserclarel electronegativeelectroretinograminthemodernmultimodalimagingera
AT jamiesonrobynv electronegativeelectroretinograminthemodernmultimodalimagingera
AT cornishelisae electronegativeelectroretinograminthemodernmultimodalimagingera
AT griggjohnr electronegativeelectroretinograminthemodernmultimodalimagingera