Head in the sand: Contemporary Australian attitudes towards induction of labour

Ambivalence in Australian thought on induction of labour, despite recent evidence, stands out in contrast to ever‐increasing rates of this intervention. As consent obligations on information provision have crystallised in maternity care, this article examines whether consumer‐led expectations and le...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ananthram, Harsha, Rane, Ajay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Clinical Perspective
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9544769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35289394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13512
_version_ 1784804671834030080
author Ananthram, Harsha
Rane, Ajay
author_facet Ananthram, Harsha
Rane, Ajay
author_sort Ananthram, Harsha
collection PubMed
description Ambivalence in Australian thought on induction of labour, despite recent evidence, stands out in contrast to ever‐increasing rates of this intervention. As consent obligations on information provision have crystallised in maternity care, this article examines whether consumer‐led expectations and legal obligations may precipitate change to end the cultural stigma around induction of labour.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9544769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95447692022-10-14 Head in the sand: Contemporary Australian attitudes towards induction of labour Ananthram, Harsha Rane, Ajay Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol Clinical Perspective Ambivalence in Australian thought on induction of labour, despite recent evidence, stands out in contrast to ever‐increasing rates of this intervention. As consent obligations on information provision have crystallised in maternity care, this article examines whether consumer‐led expectations and legal obligations may precipitate change to end the cultural stigma around induction of labour. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-15 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9544769/ /pubmed/35289394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13512 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Clinical Perspective
Ananthram, Harsha
Rane, Ajay
Head in the sand: Contemporary Australian attitudes towards induction of labour
title Head in the sand: Contemporary Australian attitudes towards induction of labour
title_full Head in the sand: Contemporary Australian attitudes towards induction of labour
title_fullStr Head in the sand: Contemporary Australian attitudes towards induction of labour
title_full_unstemmed Head in the sand: Contemporary Australian attitudes towards induction of labour
title_short Head in the sand: Contemporary Australian attitudes towards induction of labour
title_sort head in the sand: contemporary australian attitudes towards induction of labour
topic Clinical Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9544769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35289394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13512
work_keys_str_mv AT ananthramharsha headinthesandcontemporaryaustralianattitudestowardsinductionoflabour
AT raneajay headinthesandcontemporaryaustralianattitudestowardsinductionoflabour

Ejemplares similares