Cargando…

2022 Update of the Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics and Thrombolytics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE) Domain 6: Defining rational use of thrombolytics

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review available evidence and establish guidelines related to the use of thrombolytics for the management of small animals with suspected or confirmed thrombosis. DESIGN: PICO (Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcome) questions were formulated, and worksheets com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharp, Claire R., Blais, Marie‐Claude, Boyd, Corrin J., Brainard, Benjamin M., Chan, Daniel L., de Laforcade, Armelle, Goggs, Robert, Guillaumin, Julien, Lynch, Alex, Mays, Erin, McBride, Duana, Rosati, Tommaso, Rozanski, Elizabeth A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9544803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35881647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vec.13227
_version_ 1784804679640678400
author Sharp, Claire R.
Blais, Marie‐Claude
Boyd, Corrin J.
Brainard, Benjamin M.
Chan, Daniel L.
de Laforcade, Armelle
Goggs, Robert
Guillaumin, Julien
Lynch, Alex
Mays, Erin
McBride, Duana
Rosati, Tommaso
Rozanski, Elizabeth A.
author_facet Sharp, Claire R.
Blais, Marie‐Claude
Boyd, Corrin J.
Brainard, Benjamin M.
Chan, Daniel L.
de Laforcade, Armelle
Goggs, Robert
Guillaumin, Julien
Lynch, Alex
Mays, Erin
McBride, Duana
Rosati, Tommaso
Rozanski, Elizabeth A.
author_sort Sharp, Claire R.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To systematically review available evidence and establish guidelines related to the use of thrombolytics for the management of small animals with suspected or confirmed thrombosis. DESIGN: PICO (Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcome) questions were formulated, and worksheets completed as part of a standardized and systematic literature evaluation. The population of interest included dogs and cats (considered separately) and arterial and venous thrombosis. The interventions assessed were the use of thrombolytics, compared to no thrombolytics, with or without anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents. Specific protocols for recombinant tissue plasminogen activator were also evaluated. Outcomes assessed included efficacy and safety. Relevant articles were categorized according to level of evidence, quality, and as to whether they supported, were neutral to, or opposed the PICO questions. Conclusions from the PICO worksheets were used to draft guidelines, which were subsequently refined via Delphi surveys undertaken by the Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics and Thrombolytics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE) working group. RESULTS: Fourteen PICO questions were developed, generating 14 guidelines. The majority of the literature addressing the PICO questions in dogs is experimental studies (level of evidence 3), thus providing insufficient evidence to determine if thrombolysis improves patient‐centered outcomes. In cats, literature was more limited and often neutral to the PICO questions, precluding strong evidence‐based recommendations for thrombolytic use. Rather, for both species, suggestions are made regarding considerations for when thrombolytic drugs may be considered, the combination of thrombolytics with anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs, and the choice of thrombolytic agent. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial additional research is needed to address the role of thrombolytics for the treatment of arterial and venous thrombosis in dogs and cats. Clinical trials with patient‐centered outcomes will be most valuable for addressing knowledge gaps in the field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9544803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95448032022-10-14 2022 Update of the Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics and Thrombolytics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE) Domain 6: Defining rational use of thrombolytics Sharp, Claire R. Blais, Marie‐Claude Boyd, Corrin J. Brainard, Benjamin M. Chan, Daniel L. de Laforcade, Armelle Goggs, Robert Guillaumin, Julien Lynch, Alex Mays, Erin McBride, Duana Rosati, Tommaso Rozanski, Elizabeth A. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) Special Article OBJECTIVES: To systematically review available evidence and establish guidelines related to the use of thrombolytics for the management of small animals with suspected or confirmed thrombosis. DESIGN: PICO (Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcome) questions were formulated, and worksheets completed as part of a standardized and systematic literature evaluation. The population of interest included dogs and cats (considered separately) and arterial and venous thrombosis. The interventions assessed were the use of thrombolytics, compared to no thrombolytics, with or without anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents. Specific protocols for recombinant tissue plasminogen activator were also evaluated. Outcomes assessed included efficacy and safety. Relevant articles were categorized according to level of evidence, quality, and as to whether they supported, were neutral to, or opposed the PICO questions. Conclusions from the PICO worksheets were used to draft guidelines, which were subsequently refined via Delphi surveys undertaken by the Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics and Thrombolytics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE) working group. RESULTS: Fourteen PICO questions were developed, generating 14 guidelines. The majority of the literature addressing the PICO questions in dogs is experimental studies (level of evidence 3), thus providing insufficient evidence to determine if thrombolysis improves patient‐centered outcomes. In cats, literature was more limited and often neutral to the PICO questions, precluding strong evidence‐based recommendations for thrombolytic use. Rather, for both species, suggestions are made regarding considerations for when thrombolytic drugs may be considered, the combination of thrombolytics with anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs, and the choice of thrombolytic agent. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial additional research is needed to address the role of thrombolytics for the treatment of arterial and venous thrombosis in dogs and cats. Clinical trials with patient‐centered outcomes will be most valuable for addressing knowledge gaps in the field. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-26 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9544803/ /pubmed/35881647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vec.13227 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Article
Sharp, Claire R.
Blais, Marie‐Claude
Boyd, Corrin J.
Brainard, Benjamin M.
Chan, Daniel L.
de Laforcade, Armelle
Goggs, Robert
Guillaumin, Julien
Lynch, Alex
Mays, Erin
McBride, Duana
Rosati, Tommaso
Rozanski, Elizabeth A.
2022 Update of the Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics and Thrombolytics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE) Domain 6: Defining rational use of thrombolytics
title 2022 Update of the Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics and Thrombolytics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE) Domain 6: Defining rational use of thrombolytics
title_full 2022 Update of the Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics and Thrombolytics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE) Domain 6: Defining rational use of thrombolytics
title_fullStr 2022 Update of the Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics and Thrombolytics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE) Domain 6: Defining rational use of thrombolytics
title_full_unstemmed 2022 Update of the Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics and Thrombolytics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE) Domain 6: Defining rational use of thrombolytics
title_short 2022 Update of the Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics and Thrombolytics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE) Domain 6: Defining rational use of thrombolytics
title_sort 2022 update of the consensus on the rational use of antithrombotics and thrombolytics in veterinary critical care (curative) domain 6: defining rational use of thrombolytics
topic Special Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9544803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35881647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vec.13227
work_keys_str_mv AT sharpclairer 2022updateoftheconsensusontherationaluseofantithromboticsandthrombolyticsinveterinarycriticalcarecurativedomain6definingrationaluseofthrombolytics
AT blaismarieclaude 2022updateoftheconsensusontherationaluseofantithromboticsandthrombolyticsinveterinarycriticalcarecurativedomain6definingrationaluseofthrombolytics
AT boydcorrinj 2022updateoftheconsensusontherationaluseofantithromboticsandthrombolyticsinveterinarycriticalcarecurativedomain6definingrationaluseofthrombolytics
AT brainardbenjaminm 2022updateoftheconsensusontherationaluseofantithromboticsandthrombolyticsinveterinarycriticalcarecurativedomain6definingrationaluseofthrombolytics
AT chandaniell 2022updateoftheconsensusontherationaluseofantithromboticsandthrombolyticsinveterinarycriticalcarecurativedomain6definingrationaluseofthrombolytics
AT delaforcadearmelle 2022updateoftheconsensusontherationaluseofantithromboticsandthrombolyticsinveterinarycriticalcarecurativedomain6definingrationaluseofthrombolytics
AT goggsrobert 2022updateoftheconsensusontherationaluseofantithromboticsandthrombolyticsinveterinarycriticalcarecurativedomain6definingrationaluseofthrombolytics
AT guillauminjulien 2022updateoftheconsensusontherationaluseofantithromboticsandthrombolyticsinveterinarycriticalcarecurativedomain6definingrationaluseofthrombolytics
AT lynchalex 2022updateoftheconsensusontherationaluseofantithromboticsandthrombolyticsinveterinarycriticalcarecurativedomain6definingrationaluseofthrombolytics
AT mayserin 2022updateoftheconsensusontherationaluseofantithromboticsandthrombolyticsinveterinarycriticalcarecurativedomain6definingrationaluseofthrombolytics
AT mcbrideduana 2022updateoftheconsensusontherationaluseofantithromboticsandthrombolyticsinveterinarycriticalcarecurativedomain6definingrationaluseofthrombolytics
AT rosatitommaso 2022updateoftheconsensusontherationaluseofantithromboticsandthrombolyticsinveterinarycriticalcarecurativedomain6definingrationaluseofthrombolytics
AT rozanskielizabetha 2022updateoftheconsensusontherationaluseofantithromboticsandthrombolyticsinveterinarycriticalcarecurativedomain6definingrationaluseofthrombolytics