Cargando…

Comparing hair tensile testing in the wet and the dry state: Possibilities and limitations for detecting changes of hair properties due to chemical and physical treatments

OBJECTIVES: This investigation focuses, first, on the question to which extent wet and dry tensile tests on human hair may be considered as leading to independent results. Second, we try to assess the sensitivities of wet and dry‐testing to detect changes of mechanical properties. Specifically, we w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wortmann, Franz J., Quadflieg, Jutta M., Wortmann, Gabriele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9544838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35689553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ics.12796
_version_ 1784804687662284800
author Wortmann, Franz J.
Quadflieg, Jutta M.
Wortmann, Gabriele
author_facet Wortmann, Franz J.
Quadflieg, Jutta M.
Wortmann, Gabriele
author_sort Wortmann, Franz J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This investigation focuses, first, on the question to which extent wet and dry tensile tests on human hair may be considered as leading to independent results. Second, we try to assess the sensitivities of wet and dry‐testing to detect changes of mechanical properties. Specifically, we were interested in separating changes, which were induced by a combination of a chemical (oxidation/bleach) and a physical treatment (heat). METHODS: The basis for our study are data for the tensile properties (wet and dry) of a set of untreated and bleached hair tresses, which were submitted to the same schedule of thermal treatments. As characteristic tensile parameters, we chose modulus (E), break extension (BE), and break stress (BS). First, parameters were analysed across treatments for the correlations between wet and dry data. Second, we applied two‐factor analysis of variance to assess the effects of the factors and their potential interaction. RESULTS: Correlations for the dry versus wet data show only a weak relationship for E, while coefficients of determination (R ( 2 )) are quite high for BE and BS. Two‐factor ANOVA enables to quantify the various contributions to the Total Sum‐of‐Squares for all three parameters. We show that the parameters respond quite differently to the chemical and the thermal treatments as well as to testing conditions (wet or dry). It is of interest to note that the interaction between the chemical and the physical treatment is generally quite weak. For the interpretation of the results, we use the concept of the humidity‐dependent as well as strain‐induced glass transition of the amorphous matrix. CONCLUSIONS: The independence hypothesis for dry and wet tensile measurements only applies for modulus. Overall, we consider modulus (wet) as the best tensile measure of fibre damage when assessing chemical and/or physical treatments. Under ambient conditions (dry), break stress is shown to be a feasible alternative measure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9544838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95448382022-10-14 Comparing hair tensile testing in the wet and the dry state: Possibilities and limitations for detecting changes of hair properties due to chemical and physical treatments Wortmann, Franz J. Quadflieg, Jutta M. Wortmann, Gabriele Int J Cosmet Sci Original Articles OBJECTIVES: This investigation focuses, first, on the question to which extent wet and dry tensile tests on human hair may be considered as leading to independent results. Second, we try to assess the sensitivities of wet and dry‐testing to detect changes of mechanical properties. Specifically, we were interested in separating changes, which were induced by a combination of a chemical (oxidation/bleach) and a physical treatment (heat). METHODS: The basis for our study are data for the tensile properties (wet and dry) of a set of untreated and bleached hair tresses, which were submitted to the same schedule of thermal treatments. As characteristic tensile parameters, we chose modulus (E), break extension (BE), and break stress (BS). First, parameters were analysed across treatments for the correlations between wet and dry data. Second, we applied two‐factor analysis of variance to assess the effects of the factors and their potential interaction. RESULTS: Correlations for the dry versus wet data show only a weak relationship for E, while coefficients of determination (R ( 2 )) are quite high for BE and BS. Two‐factor ANOVA enables to quantify the various contributions to the Total Sum‐of‐Squares for all three parameters. We show that the parameters respond quite differently to the chemical and the thermal treatments as well as to testing conditions (wet or dry). It is of interest to note that the interaction between the chemical and the physical treatment is generally quite weak. For the interpretation of the results, we use the concept of the humidity‐dependent as well as strain‐induced glass transition of the amorphous matrix. CONCLUSIONS: The independence hypothesis for dry and wet tensile measurements only applies for modulus. Overall, we consider modulus (wet) as the best tensile measure of fibre damage when assessing chemical and/or physical treatments. Under ambient conditions (dry), break stress is shown to be a feasible alternative measure. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-15 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9544838/ /pubmed/35689553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ics.12796 Text en © 2022 The Authors. International Journal of Cosmetic Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Cosmetic Scientists and Societe Francaise de Cosmetologie. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Wortmann, Franz J.
Quadflieg, Jutta M.
Wortmann, Gabriele
Comparing hair tensile testing in the wet and the dry state: Possibilities and limitations for detecting changes of hair properties due to chemical and physical treatments
title Comparing hair tensile testing in the wet and the dry state: Possibilities and limitations for detecting changes of hair properties due to chemical and physical treatments
title_full Comparing hair tensile testing in the wet and the dry state: Possibilities and limitations for detecting changes of hair properties due to chemical and physical treatments
title_fullStr Comparing hair tensile testing in the wet and the dry state: Possibilities and limitations for detecting changes of hair properties due to chemical and physical treatments
title_full_unstemmed Comparing hair tensile testing in the wet and the dry state: Possibilities and limitations for detecting changes of hair properties due to chemical and physical treatments
title_short Comparing hair tensile testing in the wet and the dry state: Possibilities and limitations for detecting changes of hair properties due to chemical and physical treatments
title_sort comparing hair tensile testing in the wet and the dry state: possibilities and limitations for detecting changes of hair properties due to chemical and physical treatments
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9544838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35689553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ics.12796
work_keys_str_mv AT wortmannfranzj comparinghairtensiletestinginthewetandthedrystatepossibilitiesandlimitationsfordetectingchangesofhairpropertiesduetochemicalandphysicaltreatments
AT quadfliegjuttam comparinghairtensiletestinginthewetandthedrystatepossibilitiesandlimitationsfordetectingchangesofhairpropertiesduetochemicalandphysicaltreatments
AT wortmanngabriele comparinghairtensiletestinginthewetandthedrystatepossibilitiesandlimitationsfordetectingchangesofhairpropertiesduetochemicalandphysicaltreatments