Cargando…

Persistent disparities in diabetes medication receipt by socio‐economic disadvantage in Australia

BACKGROUND: It is unknown how use of newer glucose‐lowering drugs (GLDs) has changed in Australia following the publication of clinical trials demonstrating definitive clinical advantages for glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1 RAs) and sodium‐glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morton, Jedidiah I., Ilomӓki, Jenni, Magliano, Dianna J., Shaw, Jonathan E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35694847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.14898
_version_ 1784804733971595264
author Morton, Jedidiah I.
Ilomӓki, Jenni
Magliano, Dianna J.
Shaw, Jonathan E.
author_facet Morton, Jedidiah I.
Ilomӓki, Jenni
Magliano, Dianna J.
Shaw, Jonathan E.
author_sort Morton, Jedidiah I.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is unknown how use of newer glucose‐lowering drugs (GLDs) has changed in Australia following the publication of clinical trials demonstrating definitive clinical advantages for glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1 RAs) and sodium‐glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is), and whether this varies by socio‐economic disadvantage. METHODS: We included 1,064,645 people with type 2 diabetes registered on the National Diabetes Services Scheme. This cohort was linked to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme database to evaluate trends in diabetes medication receipt and variation by socio‐economic disadvantage between 2013 and 2019. RESULTS: The proportion of people with type 2 diabetes receiving ≥3 GLDs concurrently increased from 12% in 2013 to 25% in 2019. By 2019, 6% of people with diabetes were receiving a GLP‐1 RA and 21% an SGLT2i. Disparities in receipt of GLP‐1 RAs and SGLT2is by socio‐economic disadvantage decreased over time (ORs for most vs. least disadvantaged quintile were 0.80 [0.77–0.85] and 0.87 [0.82–0.94] in 2014 and 0.95 [0.92–0.98] and 1.07 [1.05–1.09] in 2019 for GLP‐1 RAs and SGLT2is, respectively). However, people in more disadvantaged areas were more likely to receive multiple GLDs. After stratifying by number of concurrent GLDs received, people in more disadvantaged areas were less likely to receive GLP‐1 RAs and SGLT2is in 2019 (ORs for most vs. least disadvantaged: 0.81 [0.78–0.84] and 0.90 [0.87–0.93] for people receiving ≥3 GLDs, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: After controlling for intensity of glucose‐lowering therapy, people in more disadvantaged areas were less likely to receive cardioprotective GLDs, although disparities decreased over time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9545050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95450502022-10-14 Persistent disparities in diabetes medication receipt by socio‐economic disadvantage in Australia Morton, Jedidiah I. Ilomӓki, Jenni Magliano, Dianna J. Shaw, Jonathan E. Diabet Med Research: Epidemiology BACKGROUND: It is unknown how use of newer glucose‐lowering drugs (GLDs) has changed in Australia following the publication of clinical trials demonstrating definitive clinical advantages for glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1 RAs) and sodium‐glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is), and whether this varies by socio‐economic disadvantage. METHODS: We included 1,064,645 people with type 2 diabetes registered on the National Diabetes Services Scheme. This cohort was linked to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme database to evaluate trends in diabetes medication receipt and variation by socio‐economic disadvantage between 2013 and 2019. RESULTS: The proportion of people with type 2 diabetes receiving ≥3 GLDs concurrently increased from 12% in 2013 to 25% in 2019. By 2019, 6% of people with diabetes were receiving a GLP‐1 RA and 21% an SGLT2i. Disparities in receipt of GLP‐1 RAs and SGLT2is by socio‐economic disadvantage decreased over time (ORs for most vs. least disadvantaged quintile were 0.80 [0.77–0.85] and 0.87 [0.82–0.94] in 2014 and 0.95 [0.92–0.98] and 1.07 [1.05–1.09] in 2019 for GLP‐1 RAs and SGLT2is, respectively). However, people in more disadvantaged areas were more likely to receive multiple GLDs. After stratifying by number of concurrent GLDs received, people in more disadvantaged areas were less likely to receive GLP‐1 RAs and SGLT2is in 2019 (ORs for most vs. least disadvantaged: 0.81 [0.78–0.84] and 0.90 [0.87–0.93] for people receiving ≥3 GLDs, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: After controlling for intensity of glucose‐lowering therapy, people in more disadvantaged areas were less likely to receive cardioprotective GLDs, although disparities decreased over time. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-20 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9545050/ /pubmed/35694847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.14898 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Diabetes UK. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research: Epidemiology
Morton, Jedidiah I.
Ilomӓki, Jenni
Magliano, Dianna J.
Shaw, Jonathan E.
Persistent disparities in diabetes medication receipt by socio‐economic disadvantage in Australia
title Persistent disparities in diabetes medication receipt by socio‐economic disadvantage in Australia
title_full Persistent disparities in diabetes medication receipt by socio‐economic disadvantage in Australia
title_fullStr Persistent disparities in diabetes medication receipt by socio‐economic disadvantage in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Persistent disparities in diabetes medication receipt by socio‐economic disadvantage in Australia
title_short Persistent disparities in diabetes medication receipt by socio‐economic disadvantage in Australia
title_sort persistent disparities in diabetes medication receipt by socio‐economic disadvantage in australia
topic Research: Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35694847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.14898
work_keys_str_mv AT mortonjedidiahi persistentdisparitiesindiabetesmedicationreceiptbysocioeconomicdisadvantageinaustralia
AT ilomäkijenni persistentdisparitiesindiabetesmedicationreceiptbysocioeconomicdisadvantageinaustralia
AT maglianodiannaj persistentdisparitiesindiabetesmedicationreceiptbysocioeconomicdisadvantageinaustralia
AT shawjonathane persistentdisparitiesindiabetesmedicationreceiptbysocioeconomicdisadvantageinaustralia