Cargando…

Experimental manipulation of sexual traits in barn swallow populations—No evidence for divergent sexual selection

Safran et al. (2016a) manipulated two sexual traits (ventral plumage coloration and tail streamer length) in male barn swallows (Hirundo rustica) and reported divergent effects on paternity change between two study populations, in Colorado and Israel. They concluded that geographical variation in th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Lifjeld, Jan T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35554925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/evo.14505
_version_ 1784804744641904640
author Lifjeld, Jan T.
author_facet Lifjeld, Jan T.
author_sort Lifjeld, Jan T.
collection PubMed
description Safran et al. (2016a) manipulated two sexual traits (ventral plumage coloration and tail streamer length) in male barn swallows (Hirundo rustica) and reported divergent effects on paternity change between two study populations, in Colorado and Israel. They concluded that geographical variation in the two phenotypic traits is maintained by divergent sexual selection. However, the response variable they used, the longitudinal change in paternity from a pre‐treatment clutch to a post‐treatment clutch, does not reflect an unbiased effect of the treatment. Here, I show that the magnitude of the change in paternity is influenced by variation in the initial paternity score among the treatment groups, which is presumably due to stochastic variation from low sample sizes in the treatment groups. When the bias was accounted for in re‐analyses of the Israeli dataset, the statistical significance of one of two treatment effects disappeared. Similar re‐analyses of the American population were not possible due to inaccessibility of raw data for individual clutches, but an assessment of the mean scores indicates that the two significant treatment effects in this population were similarly biased in their initial paternity scores. The conclusion of divergent sexual selection on male phenotypic traits between the two populations does not seem to be supported.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9545097
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95450972022-10-14 Experimental manipulation of sexual traits in barn swallow populations—No evidence for divergent sexual selection Lifjeld, Jan T. Evolution Technical Notes Safran et al. (2016a) manipulated two sexual traits (ventral plumage coloration and tail streamer length) in male barn swallows (Hirundo rustica) and reported divergent effects on paternity change between two study populations, in Colorado and Israel. They concluded that geographical variation in the two phenotypic traits is maintained by divergent sexual selection. However, the response variable they used, the longitudinal change in paternity from a pre‐treatment clutch to a post‐treatment clutch, does not reflect an unbiased effect of the treatment. Here, I show that the magnitude of the change in paternity is influenced by variation in the initial paternity score among the treatment groups, which is presumably due to stochastic variation from low sample sizes in the treatment groups. When the bias was accounted for in re‐analyses of the Israeli dataset, the statistical significance of one of two treatment effects disappeared. Similar re‐analyses of the American population were not possible due to inaccessibility of raw data for individual clutches, but an assessment of the mean scores indicates that the two significant treatment effects in this population were similarly biased in their initial paternity scores. The conclusion of divergent sexual selection on male phenotypic traits between the two populations does not seem to be supported. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-26 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9545097/ /pubmed/35554925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/evo.14505 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Evolution published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Society for the Study of Evolution. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
Lifjeld, Jan T.
Experimental manipulation of sexual traits in barn swallow populations—No evidence for divergent sexual selection
title Experimental manipulation of sexual traits in barn swallow populations—No evidence for divergent sexual selection
title_full Experimental manipulation of sexual traits in barn swallow populations—No evidence for divergent sexual selection
title_fullStr Experimental manipulation of sexual traits in barn swallow populations—No evidence for divergent sexual selection
title_full_unstemmed Experimental manipulation of sexual traits in barn swallow populations—No evidence for divergent sexual selection
title_short Experimental manipulation of sexual traits in barn swallow populations—No evidence for divergent sexual selection
title_sort experimental manipulation of sexual traits in barn swallow populations—no evidence for divergent sexual selection
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35554925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/evo.14505
work_keys_str_mv AT lifjeldjant experimentalmanipulationofsexualtraitsinbarnswallowpopulationsnoevidencefordivergentsexualselection