Cargando…
Barriers and Enablers Influencing Women's Adoption and Continuation of Vaginally Inserted Contraceptive Methods: A Literature Review
Most vaginally inserted methods have limited availability and use despite offering characteristics that align with many women's stated preferences (e.g., nonhormonal and/or on demand). The objective of this review was to identify enablers and barriers to women's adoption and continuation o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35922382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12209 |
_version_ | 1784804748535267328 |
---|---|
author | Harris, Danielle M. Dam, Anita Morrison, Kate Mann, Chastain Jackson, Ashley Bledsoe, Shannon M. Rowan, Andrea Longfield, Kim |
author_facet | Harris, Danielle M. Dam, Anita Morrison, Kate Mann, Chastain Jackson, Ashley Bledsoe, Shannon M. Rowan, Andrea Longfield, Kim |
author_sort | Harris, Danielle M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most vaginally inserted methods have limited availability and use despite offering characteristics that align with many women's stated preferences (e.g., nonhormonal and/or on demand). The objective of this review was to identify enablers and barriers to women's adoption and continuation of vaginally inserted contraceptive methods in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs). We searched three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science) and 18 websites using keywords related to five vaginally inserted contraceptive methods (diaphragm, vaginal ring, female condom, copper intrauterine device [IUD], hormonal IUD) and terms associated with their adoption and continuation. Searches were limited to resources published between January 2010 and September 2020. Studies eligible for inclusion in our review presented results on women's use and perspectives on the enablers and barriers to adoption and continuation of the vaginally inserted contraceptive methods of interest in LMICs. Relevant studies among women's partners were also included, but not those of providers or other stakeholders. Data were coded, analyzed, and disaggregated according to a framework grounded in family planning (FP) literature and behavioral theories common to FP research and program implementation. Our initial search yielded 13,848 results, with 182 studies ultimately included in the analysis. Across methods, we found common enablers for method adoption, including quality contraceptive counseling as well as alignment between a woman's preferences and a method's duration of use and side effect profile. Common barriers included a lack of familiarity with the methods and product cost. Notably, vaginal insertion was not a major barrier to adoption in the literature reviewed. Vaginally inserted methods of contraception have the potential to fill a gap in method offerings and expand choice. Programmatic actions should address key barriers and enable voluntary use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9545114 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95451142022-10-14 Barriers and Enablers Influencing Women's Adoption and Continuation of Vaginally Inserted Contraceptive Methods: A Literature Review Harris, Danielle M. Dam, Anita Morrison, Kate Mann, Chastain Jackson, Ashley Bledsoe, Shannon M. Rowan, Andrea Longfield, Kim Stud Fam Plann Articles Most vaginally inserted methods have limited availability and use despite offering characteristics that align with many women's stated preferences (e.g., nonhormonal and/or on demand). The objective of this review was to identify enablers and barriers to women's adoption and continuation of vaginally inserted contraceptive methods in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs). We searched three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science) and 18 websites using keywords related to five vaginally inserted contraceptive methods (diaphragm, vaginal ring, female condom, copper intrauterine device [IUD], hormonal IUD) and terms associated with their adoption and continuation. Searches were limited to resources published between January 2010 and September 2020. Studies eligible for inclusion in our review presented results on women's use and perspectives on the enablers and barriers to adoption and continuation of the vaginally inserted contraceptive methods of interest in LMICs. Relevant studies among women's partners were also included, but not those of providers or other stakeholders. Data were coded, analyzed, and disaggregated according to a framework grounded in family planning (FP) literature and behavioral theories common to FP research and program implementation. Our initial search yielded 13,848 results, with 182 studies ultimately included in the analysis. Across methods, we found common enablers for method adoption, including quality contraceptive counseling as well as alignment between a woman's preferences and a method's duration of use and side effect profile. Common barriers included a lack of familiarity with the methods and product cost. Notably, vaginal insertion was not a major barrier to adoption in the literature reviewed. Vaginally inserted methods of contraception have the potential to fill a gap in method offerings and expand choice. Programmatic actions should address key barriers and enable voluntary use. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-03 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9545114/ /pubmed/35922382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12209 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Studies in Family Planning published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Population Council. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Articles Harris, Danielle M. Dam, Anita Morrison, Kate Mann, Chastain Jackson, Ashley Bledsoe, Shannon M. Rowan, Andrea Longfield, Kim Barriers and Enablers Influencing Women's Adoption and Continuation of Vaginally Inserted Contraceptive Methods: A Literature Review |
title | Barriers and Enablers Influencing Women's Adoption and Continuation of Vaginally Inserted Contraceptive Methods: A Literature Review |
title_full | Barriers and Enablers Influencing Women's Adoption and Continuation of Vaginally Inserted Contraceptive Methods: A Literature Review |
title_fullStr | Barriers and Enablers Influencing Women's Adoption and Continuation of Vaginally Inserted Contraceptive Methods: A Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Barriers and Enablers Influencing Women's Adoption and Continuation of Vaginally Inserted Contraceptive Methods: A Literature Review |
title_short | Barriers and Enablers Influencing Women's Adoption and Continuation of Vaginally Inserted Contraceptive Methods: A Literature Review |
title_sort | barriers and enablers influencing women's adoption and continuation of vaginally inserted contraceptive methods: a literature review |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35922382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12209 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harrisdaniellem barriersandenablersinfluencingwomensadoptionandcontinuationofvaginallyinsertedcontraceptivemethodsaliteraturereview AT damanita barriersandenablersinfluencingwomensadoptionandcontinuationofvaginallyinsertedcontraceptivemethodsaliteraturereview AT morrisonkate barriersandenablersinfluencingwomensadoptionandcontinuationofvaginallyinsertedcontraceptivemethodsaliteraturereview AT mannchastain barriersandenablersinfluencingwomensadoptionandcontinuationofvaginallyinsertedcontraceptivemethodsaliteraturereview AT jacksonashley barriersandenablersinfluencingwomensadoptionandcontinuationofvaginallyinsertedcontraceptivemethodsaliteraturereview AT bledsoeshannonm barriersandenablersinfluencingwomensadoptionandcontinuationofvaginallyinsertedcontraceptivemethodsaliteraturereview AT rowanandrea barriersandenablersinfluencingwomensadoptionandcontinuationofvaginallyinsertedcontraceptivemethodsaliteraturereview AT longfieldkim barriersandenablersinfluencingwomensadoptionandcontinuationofvaginallyinsertedcontraceptivemethodsaliteraturereview |