Cargando…

Latent classes of maladaptive personality traits exhibit differences in social processing

OBJECTIVE: Social processing (SP) deficits manifest across numerous mental disorders. However, this research has been plagued by heterogeneity and a piecemeal approach whereby skills are examined in isolation rather than as part of an integrated cognitive system. Here, we combined two dimensional fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanegraaf, Lauren, Hohwy, Jakob, Verdejo‐Garcia, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34714935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12686
_version_ 1784804804216750080
author Hanegraaf, Lauren
Hohwy, Jakob
Verdejo‐Garcia, Antonio
author_facet Hanegraaf, Lauren
Hohwy, Jakob
Verdejo‐Garcia, Antonio
author_sort Hanegraaf, Lauren
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Social processing (SP) deficits manifest across numerous mental disorders. However, this research has been plagued by heterogeneity and a piecemeal approach whereby skills are examined in isolation rather than as part of an integrated cognitive system. Here, we combined two dimensional frameworks of psychopathology to address these limitations. METHOD: We utilized the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) to distill trait‐related heterogeneity within a community sample (n = 200), and the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) ‘Systems for Social Processes’ to comprehensively assess SP. We first applied latent class analyses (LCA) to derive AMPD‐based groups and subsequently contrasted the performance of these groups on a SP test battery that we developed to align with the RDoC SP constructs. RESULTS: Our LCA yielded four distinct subgroups. The recognizable trait profiles and psychopathological symptoms of these classes suggested they were clinically meaningful. The subgroups differed in their SP profiles: one displayed deficits regarding the self, a second displayed deficits in understanding others, a third displayed more severe deficits including affiliation problems, whilst the fourth showed normal performance. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the link between clusters of maladaptive personality traits and distinctive profiles of SP deficits, which may inform research on disorders involving SP dysfunctions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9545362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95453622022-10-14 Latent classes of maladaptive personality traits exhibit differences in social processing Hanegraaf, Lauren Hohwy, Jakob Verdejo‐Garcia, Antonio J Pers Original Articles OBJECTIVE: Social processing (SP) deficits manifest across numerous mental disorders. However, this research has been plagued by heterogeneity and a piecemeal approach whereby skills are examined in isolation rather than as part of an integrated cognitive system. Here, we combined two dimensional frameworks of psychopathology to address these limitations. METHOD: We utilized the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) to distill trait‐related heterogeneity within a community sample (n = 200), and the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) ‘Systems for Social Processes’ to comprehensively assess SP. We first applied latent class analyses (LCA) to derive AMPD‐based groups and subsequently contrasted the performance of these groups on a SP test battery that we developed to align with the RDoC SP constructs. RESULTS: Our LCA yielded four distinct subgroups. The recognizable trait profiles and psychopathological symptoms of these classes suggested they were clinically meaningful. The subgroups differed in their SP profiles: one displayed deficits regarding the self, a second displayed deficits in understanding others, a third displayed more severe deficits including affiliation problems, whilst the fourth showed normal performance. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the link between clusters of maladaptive personality traits and distinctive profiles of SP deficits, which may inform research on disorders involving SP dysfunctions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-10 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9545362/ /pubmed/34714935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12686 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Personality published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hanegraaf, Lauren
Hohwy, Jakob
Verdejo‐Garcia, Antonio
Latent classes of maladaptive personality traits exhibit differences in social processing
title Latent classes of maladaptive personality traits exhibit differences in social processing
title_full Latent classes of maladaptive personality traits exhibit differences in social processing
title_fullStr Latent classes of maladaptive personality traits exhibit differences in social processing
title_full_unstemmed Latent classes of maladaptive personality traits exhibit differences in social processing
title_short Latent classes of maladaptive personality traits exhibit differences in social processing
title_sort latent classes of maladaptive personality traits exhibit differences in social processing
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34714935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12686
work_keys_str_mv AT hanegraaflauren latentclassesofmaladaptivepersonalitytraitsexhibitdifferencesinsocialprocessing
AT hohwyjakob latentclassesofmaladaptivepersonalitytraitsexhibitdifferencesinsocialprocessing
AT verdejogarciaantonio latentclassesofmaladaptivepersonalitytraitsexhibitdifferencesinsocialprocessing