Cargando…

Mechanism of injury and special considerations as predictive of serious injury: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's field triage guidelines (FTG) are routinely used by emergency medical services personnel for triaging injured patients. The most recent (2011) FTG contains physiologic, anatomic, mechanism, and special consideration steps. Our objecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lupton, Joshua R., Davis‐O'Reilly, Cynthia, Jungbauer, Rebecca M., Newgard, Craig D., Fallat, Mary E., Brown, Joshua B., Mann, N. Clay, Jurkovich, Gregory J., Bulger, Eileen, Gestring, Mark L., Lerner, E. Brooke, Chou, Roger, Totten, Annette M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35319149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.14489
_version_ 1784804811095408640
author Lupton, Joshua R.
Davis‐O'Reilly, Cynthia
Jungbauer, Rebecca M.
Newgard, Craig D.
Fallat, Mary E.
Brown, Joshua B.
Mann, N. Clay
Jurkovich, Gregory J.
Bulger, Eileen
Gestring, Mark L.
Lerner, E. Brooke
Chou, Roger
Totten, Annette M.
author_facet Lupton, Joshua R.
Davis‐O'Reilly, Cynthia
Jungbauer, Rebecca M.
Newgard, Craig D.
Fallat, Mary E.
Brown, Joshua B.
Mann, N. Clay
Jurkovich, Gregory J.
Bulger, Eileen
Gestring, Mark L.
Lerner, E. Brooke
Chou, Roger
Totten, Annette M.
author_sort Lupton, Joshua R.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's field triage guidelines (FTG) are routinely used by emergency medical services personnel for triaging injured patients. The most recent (2011) FTG contains physiologic, anatomic, mechanism, and special consideration steps. Our objective was to systematically review the criteria in the mechanism and special consideration steps that might be predictive of serious injury or need for a trauma center. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the predictive utility of mechanism and special consideration criteria for predicting serious injury. A research librarian searched in Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases for studies published between January 2011 and February 2021. Eligible studies were identified using a priori inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies were excluded if they lacked an outcome for serious injury, such as measures of resource use, injury severity scores, mortality, or composite measures using a combination of outcomes. Given the heterogeneity in populations, measures, and outcomes, results were synthesized qualitatively focusing on positive likelihood ratios (LR+) whenever these could be calculated from presented data or adjusted odds ratios (aOR). RESULTS: We reviewed 2418 abstracts and 315 full‐text publications and identified 42 relevant studies. The factors most predictive of serious injury across multiple studies were death in the same vehicle (LR+ 2.2–7.4), ejection (aOR 3.2–266.2), extrication (LR+ 1.1–6.6), lack of seat belt use (aOR 4.4–11.3), high speeds (aOR 2.0–2.9), concerning crash variables identified by vehicle telemetry systems (LR+ 4.7–22.2), falls from height (LR+ 2.4–5.9), and axial load or diving (aOR 2.5–17.6). Minor or inconsistent predictors of serious injury were vehicle intrusion (LR+ 0.8–7.2), cardiopulmonary or neurologic comorbidities (LR+ 0.8–3.1), older age (LR+ 0.6–6.8), or anticoagulant use (LR+ 1.1–1.8). CONCLUSIONS: Select mechanism and special consideration criteria contribute positively to appropriate field triage of potentially injured patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9545392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95453922022-10-14 Mechanism of injury and special considerations as predictive of serious injury: A systematic review Lupton, Joshua R. Davis‐O'Reilly, Cynthia Jungbauer, Rebecca M. Newgard, Craig D. Fallat, Mary E. Brown, Joshua B. Mann, N. Clay Jurkovich, Gregory J. Bulger, Eileen Gestring, Mark L. Lerner, E. Brooke Chou, Roger Totten, Annette M. Acad Emerg Med Systematic Reviews (With or without Meta‐analyses) OBJECTIVES: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's field triage guidelines (FTG) are routinely used by emergency medical services personnel for triaging injured patients. The most recent (2011) FTG contains physiologic, anatomic, mechanism, and special consideration steps. Our objective was to systematically review the criteria in the mechanism and special consideration steps that might be predictive of serious injury or need for a trauma center. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the predictive utility of mechanism and special consideration criteria for predicting serious injury. A research librarian searched in Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases for studies published between January 2011 and February 2021. Eligible studies were identified using a priori inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies were excluded if they lacked an outcome for serious injury, such as measures of resource use, injury severity scores, mortality, or composite measures using a combination of outcomes. Given the heterogeneity in populations, measures, and outcomes, results were synthesized qualitatively focusing on positive likelihood ratios (LR+) whenever these could be calculated from presented data or adjusted odds ratios (aOR). RESULTS: We reviewed 2418 abstracts and 315 full‐text publications and identified 42 relevant studies. The factors most predictive of serious injury across multiple studies were death in the same vehicle (LR+ 2.2–7.4), ejection (aOR 3.2–266.2), extrication (LR+ 1.1–6.6), lack of seat belt use (aOR 4.4–11.3), high speeds (aOR 2.0–2.9), concerning crash variables identified by vehicle telemetry systems (LR+ 4.7–22.2), falls from height (LR+ 2.4–5.9), and axial load or diving (aOR 2.5–17.6). Minor or inconsistent predictors of serious injury were vehicle intrusion (LR+ 0.8–7.2), cardiopulmonary or neurologic comorbidities (LR+ 0.8–3.1), older age (LR+ 0.6–6.8), or anticoagulant use (LR+ 1.1–1.8). CONCLUSIONS: Select mechanism and special consideration criteria contribute positively to appropriate field triage of potentially injured patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-22 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9545392/ /pubmed/35319149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.14489 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Academic Emergency Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews (With or without Meta‐analyses)
Lupton, Joshua R.
Davis‐O'Reilly, Cynthia
Jungbauer, Rebecca M.
Newgard, Craig D.
Fallat, Mary E.
Brown, Joshua B.
Mann, N. Clay
Jurkovich, Gregory J.
Bulger, Eileen
Gestring, Mark L.
Lerner, E. Brooke
Chou, Roger
Totten, Annette M.
Mechanism of injury and special considerations as predictive of serious injury: A systematic review
title Mechanism of injury and special considerations as predictive of serious injury: A systematic review
title_full Mechanism of injury and special considerations as predictive of serious injury: A systematic review
title_fullStr Mechanism of injury and special considerations as predictive of serious injury: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Mechanism of injury and special considerations as predictive of serious injury: A systematic review
title_short Mechanism of injury and special considerations as predictive of serious injury: A systematic review
title_sort mechanism of injury and special considerations as predictive of serious injury: a systematic review
topic Systematic Reviews (With or without Meta‐analyses)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9545392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35319149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.14489
work_keys_str_mv AT luptonjoshuar mechanismofinjuryandspecialconsiderationsaspredictiveofseriousinjuryasystematicreview
AT davisoreillycynthia mechanismofinjuryandspecialconsiderationsaspredictiveofseriousinjuryasystematicreview
AT jungbauerrebeccam mechanismofinjuryandspecialconsiderationsaspredictiveofseriousinjuryasystematicreview
AT newgardcraigd mechanismofinjuryandspecialconsiderationsaspredictiveofseriousinjuryasystematicreview
AT fallatmarye mechanismofinjuryandspecialconsiderationsaspredictiveofseriousinjuryasystematicreview
AT brownjoshuab mechanismofinjuryandspecialconsiderationsaspredictiveofseriousinjuryasystematicreview
AT mannnclay mechanismofinjuryandspecialconsiderationsaspredictiveofseriousinjuryasystematicreview
AT jurkovichgregoryj mechanismofinjuryandspecialconsiderationsaspredictiveofseriousinjuryasystematicreview
AT bulgereileen mechanismofinjuryandspecialconsiderationsaspredictiveofseriousinjuryasystematicreview
AT gestringmarkl mechanismofinjuryandspecialconsiderationsaspredictiveofseriousinjuryasystematicreview
AT lernerebrooke mechanismofinjuryandspecialconsiderationsaspredictiveofseriousinjuryasystematicreview
AT chouroger mechanismofinjuryandspecialconsiderationsaspredictiveofseriousinjuryasystematicreview
AT tottenannettem mechanismofinjuryandspecialconsiderationsaspredictiveofseriousinjuryasystematicreview